Anna E Cyrek, Dietrich Koch, Arkadius Pacha, Sonia Radunz
{"title":"脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病伴慢性肢体缺血的有效性：小队列研究。","authors":"Anna E Cyrek, Dietrich Koch, Arkadius Pacha, Sonia Radunz","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a faster progression of PAD and a fourfold increased risk of CLTI compared to patients without DM. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculation, relieve ischemic pain and reduce the number of amputations in patients with PAD. This is a retrospective small cohort analysis of patients with diabetes and the long-term treatment effect of spinal cord stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As the main outcome of the study, we evaluated the survival and amputation of 13 diabetic patients with chronic lower-limb ischemia who were not eligible for surgical or interventional therapy. Secondary outcomes included ankle-brachial index (ABI), ischemic pain intensity, quality of life, use of analgesic medications and skin wound outcomes analyzed during long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2010 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent SCS implantation in our vascular center. At 1-year follow-up, the limb salvage rate was 92.3% (12 of 13 patients), and limb ulcers healed in 75% of patients (6/8). No patient died during the one-year follow-up. A total of 4 of patients (31%) experienced major amputation during long-term follow-up, all of them were Fontaine stage IV. Pain intensity and quality of life improved significantly at 6-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ABI measurements were unaffected by SCS treatment. There were no complications related to the procedure or device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCS is a promising treatment option for diabetic patients unsuitable for endovascular or surgical revascularization. The method improves limb survival in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia, provides significant pain control, and improves patients' quality of life. However, more studies are needed to clarify the indications for SCS and clarify its effects on the vascular system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1451622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: small cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna E Cyrek, Dietrich Koch, Arkadius Pacha, Sonia Radunz\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a faster progression of PAD and a fourfold increased risk of CLTI compared to patients without DM. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculation, relieve ischemic pain and reduce the number of amputations in patients with PAD. This is a retrospective small cohort analysis of patients with diabetes and the long-term treatment effect of spinal cord stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As the main outcome of the study, we evaluated the survival and amputation of 13 diabetic patients with chronic lower-limb ischemia who were not eligible for surgical or interventional therapy. Secondary outcomes included ankle-brachial index (ABI), ischemic pain intensity, quality of life, use of analgesic medications and skin wound outcomes analyzed during long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2010 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent SCS implantation in our vascular center. At 1-year follow-up, the limb salvage rate was 92.3% (12 of 13 patients), and limb ulcers healed in 75% of patients (6/8). No patient died during the one-year follow-up. A total of 4 of patients (31%) experienced major amputation during long-term follow-up, all of them were Fontaine stage IV. Pain intensity and quality of life improved significantly at 6-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ABI measurements were unaffected by SCS treatment. There were no complications related to the procedure or device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCS is a promising treatment option for diabetic patients unsuitable for endovascular or surgical revascularization. The method improves limb survival in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia, provides significant pain control, and improves patients' quality of life. However, more studies are needed to clarify the indications for SCS and clarify its effects on the vascular system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1451622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663922/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: small cohort study.
Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a faster progression of PAD and a fourfold increased risk of CLTI compared to patients without DM. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculation, relieve ischemic pain and reduce the number of amputations in patients with PAD. This is a retrospective small cohort analysis of patients with diabetes and the long-term treatment effect of spinal cord stimulation.
Methods: As the main outcome of the study, we evaluated the survival and amputation of 13 diabetic patients with chronic lower-limb ischemia who were not eligible for surgical or interventional therapy. Secondary outcomes included ankle-brachial index (ABI), ischemic pain intensity, quality of life, use of analgesic medications and skin wound outcomes analyzed during long-term follow-up.
Results: Between January 2010 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent SCS implantation in our vascular center. At 1-year follow-up, the limb salvage rate was 92.3% (12 of 13 patients), and limb ulcers healed in 75% of patients (6/8). No patient died during the one-year follow-up. A total of 4 of patients (31%) experienced major amputation during long-term follow-up, all of them were Fontaine stage IV. Pain intensity and quality of life improved significantly at 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). ABI measurements were unaffected by SCS treatment. There were no complications related to the procedure or device.
Conclusions: SCS is a promising treatment option for diabetic patients unsuitable for endovascular or surgical revascularization. The method improves limb survival in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia, provides significant pain control, and improves patients' quality of life. However, more studies are needed to clarify the indications for SCS and clarify its effects on the vascular system.
期刊介绍：
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
