单眼视力丧失儿童的护目镜:依从性和趋势。

Tal Yahalomi, Daphna Mezad-Koursh, Amir Sternfeld, Miriam Ehrenberg, Anat Bachar Zipori, Gad Dotan
{"title":"单眼视力丧失儿童的护目镜:依从性和趋势。","authors":"Tal Yahalomi, Daphna Mezad-Koursh, Amir Sternfeld, Miriam Ehrenberg, Anat Bachar Zipori, Gad Dotan","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Safety glasses are an important measure to prevent blindness, especially in one- eyed patients. However, patient compliance with eye protection is often limited. Unlike previous studies that described protective eyewear wearing in anophthalmic patients, this study analyzed their usage in functionally one-eyed children, having a significantly reduced visual acuity in one eye, determining common obstacles to their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey-based study analyzing protective eyewear usage in children with one eye vision loss (mean logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity ≤ 0.7).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 83 functionally one-eyed children (44 males), who received a recommendation to wear safety glasses. Ninety-nine percent of their caregivers were aware of this recommendation; however, 31% of them did not know the glasses' true purpose. Regarding actual usage, only 29 (35%) children wore safety glasses at least 90% of the day, 26 (31%) children wore them part-time (10-90% of the day) and 28 (34%) wore them rarely or never at all (< 10% of the day). Compliance was higher when glasses provided optical correction. Reasons provided for non-compliance included: discomfort, appearance, cost and vision reduction. Many respondents recollected incidents in which the glasses prevented an eye injury, and less commonly an eye injury occurring while the child was not wearing eye protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compliance with safety glasses in functionally one-eyed children is limited. Emphasizing that numerous gaps and barriers need to be bridged to improve eyewear protection in these children to prevent trauma in the better-seeing eye with its devastating lifestyle effect.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>WHAT IS KNOWN : Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports. Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends.\",\"authors\":\"Tal Yahalomi, Daphna Mezad-Koursh, Amir Sternfeld, Miriam Ehrenberg, Anat Bachar Zipori, Gad Dotan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Safety glasses are an important measure to prevent blindness, especially in one- eyed patients. However, patient compliance with eye protection is often limited. Unlike previous studies that described protective eyewear wearing in anophthalmic patients, this study analyzed their usage in functionally one-eyed children, having a significantly reduced visual acuity in one eye, determining common obstacles to their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey-based study analyzing protective eyewear usage in children with one eye vision loss (mean logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity ≤ 0.7).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 83 functionally one-eyed children (44 males), who received a recommendation to wear safety glasses. Ninety-nine percent of their caregivers were aware of this recommendation; however, 31% of them did not know the glasses' true purpose. Regarding actual usage, only 29 (35%) children wore safety glasses at least 90% of the day, 26 (31%) children wore them part-time (10-90% of the day) and 28 (34%) wore them rarely or never at all (< 10% of the day). Compliance was higher when glasses provided optical correction. Reasons provided for non-compliance included: discomfort, appearance, cost and vision reduction. Many respondents recollected incidents in which the glasses prevented an eye injury, and less commonly an eye injury occurring while the child was not wearing eye protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compliance with safety glasses in functionally one-eyed children is limited. Emphasizing that numerous gaps and barriers need to be bridged to improve eyewear protection in these children to prevent trauma in the better-seeing eye with its devastating lifestyle effect.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>WHAT IS KNOWN : Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports. Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:安全眼镜是预防失明的重要措施,特别是对单眼患者。然而,患者遵守护眼措施的情况往往有限。与以往描述无眼患者佩戴防护眼镜的研究不同,本研究分析了其在单眼视力明显下降的独眼儿童中的使用情况,确定了其使用的常见障碍。方法:通过调查分析单眼视力丧失(最小分辨角平均对数≤0.7)儿童的护目镜使用情况。结果:本研究纳入83名独眼儿童(44名男性),建议他们佩戴安全眼镜。99%的护理人员知道这一建议;然而,31%的人不知道眼镜的真正用途。在实际使用方面,只有29名(35%)儿童每天至少90%佩戴安全眼镜,26名(31%)儿童偶尔佩戴(每天10-90%),28名(34%)儿童很少佩戴或从不佩戴(结论:独眼儿童佩戴安全眼镜的依从性有限。强调需要弥合许多差距和障碍,以改善这些儿童的眼镜保护,以防止视力较好的眼睛受到创伤,其破坏性的生活方式影响。关键信息:已知情况:无眼患者通常不戴防护眼镜,这是防止他们仅存的一只眼睛受到创伤所必需的。最新发现:单眼视力下降的非无眼儿童使用防护眼镜的次数甚至更少,即使在做运动时也是如此。不戴安全眼镜的常见原因包括:不舒服,不喜欢戴眼镜的自我形象,以及晶状体导致的视力下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends.

Purpose: Safety glasses are an important measure to prevent blindness, especially in one- eyed patients. However, patient compliance with eye protection is often limited. Unlike previous studies that described protective eyewear wearing in anophthalmic patients, this study analyzed their usage in functionally one-eyed children, having a significantly reduced visual acuity in one eye, determining common obstacles to their use.

Methods: A survey-based study analyzing protective eyewear usage in children with one eye vision loss (mean logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity ≤ 0.7).

Results: This study included 83 functionally one-eyed children (44 males), who received a recommendation to wear safety glasses. Ninety-nine percent of their caregivers were aware of this recommendation; however, 31% of them did not know the glasses' true purpose. Regarding actual usage, only 29 (35%) children wore safety glasses at least 90% of the day, 26 (31%) children wore them part-time (10-90% of the day) and 28 (34%) wore them rarely or never at all (< 10% of the day). Compliance was higher when glasses provided optical correction. Reasons provided for non-compliance included: discomfort, appearance, cost and vision reduction. Many respondents recollected incidents in which the glasses prevented an eye injury, and less commonly an eye injury occurring while the child was not wearing eye protection.

Conclusions: Compliance with safety glasses in functionally one-eyed children is limited. Emphasizing that numerous gaps and barriers need to be bridged to improve eyewear protection in these children to prevent trauma in the better-seeing eye with its devastating lifestyle effect.

Key messages: WHAT IS KNOWN : Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.

What is new: Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports. Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Reexamine the link between retinal layer thickness and cognitive function after correction of axial length: the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye. Reply on comments on the paper "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". The rAAV2-ND1 gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Adverse Events Associated with Devices for Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Performed with Implants as Reported to the FDA MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1