“谁有关系?”:照顾具有医疗复杂性的共同儿童群体。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0315
P Galen DiDomizio, Madeleine Johnson, Annie Friedrich
{"title":"“谁有关系?”:照顾具有医疗复杂性的共同儿童群体。","authors":"P Galen DiDomizio, Madeleine Johnson, Annie Friedrich","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Many academic pediatric centers care for children with medical complexity (CMC) through established complex care and palliative care programs. There are little prior data investigating best practices for collaboration between these two subspecialties in caring for CMC. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study is to explore the distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities of pediatric complex care and palliative care teams as identified by providers when caring for a shared population of CMC and their families. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. <b><i>Settings/Subjects:</i></b> Pediatric complex care and palliative care providers (physicians and nurse practitioners) actively caring for CMC at academic medical centers in the Midwestern United States. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Data obtained from semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by two independent reviewers using thematic analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Interviews revealed that both programs operate within a spectrum of clinical roles, thematically organized as complex-leaning, palliative-leaning, or blended. Responses highlighted that clinical roles are more likely defined by relationships established between specific providers and families, instead of by clear boundaries between the two programs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pediatric complex care and palliative care teams provide both distinct and overlapping roles in caring for CMC. This overlap can vary between institutions and individual provider-caregiver dyads. Further studies are needed to explore collaborative practices on shared patients and caregiver perceptions on the benefits and challenges of utilizing both teams concurrently. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> This qualitative study of providers of CMC highlights the overlapping roles and responsibilities between complex care and palliative care teams in caring for a shared population of patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Who Has the Relationship?\\\": Caring for a Shared Population of Children with Medical Complexity.\",\"authors\":\"P Galen DiDomizio, Madeleine Johnson, Annie Friedrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Many academic pediatric centers care for children with medical complexity (CMC) through established complex care and palliative care programs. There are little prior data investigating best practices for collaboration between these two subspecialties in caring for CMC. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study is to explore the distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities of pediatric complex care and palliative care teams as identified by providers when caring for a shared population of CMC and their families. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. <b><i>Settings/Subjects:</i></b> Pediatric complex care and palliative care providers (physicians and nurse practitioners) actively caring for CMC at academic medical centers in the Midwestern United States. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Data obtained from semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by two independent reviewers using thematic analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Interviews revealed that both programs operate within a spectrum of clinical roles, thematically organized as complex-leaning, palliative-leaning, or blended. Responses highlighted that clinical roles are more likely defined by relationships established between specific providers and families, instead of by clear boundaries between the two programs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pediatric complex care and palliative care teams provide both distinct and overlapping roles in caring for CMC. This overlap can vary between institutions and individual provider-caregiver dyads. Further studies are needed to explore collaborative practices on shared patients and caregiver perceptions on the benefits and challenges of utilizing both teams concurrently. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> This qualitative study of providers of CMC highlights the overlapping roles and responsibilities between complex care and palliative care teams in caring for a shared population of patients and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多学术儿科中心通过建立复杂护理和姑息治疗方案来护理患有医学复杂性(CMC)的儿童。很少有先前的数据调查这两个亚专科之间的合作在照顾CMC的最佳做法。目的:本研究的目的是探讨儿科复杂护理和姑息治疗团队在照顾共同的CMC人群及其家庭时,由提供者确定的独特和重叠的角色和责任。设计:半结构化访谈的定性分析。背景/对象:在美国中西部的学术医疗中心,儿科复杂护理和姑息治疗提供者(医生和护士从业人员)积极照顾CMC。测量方法:从半结构化访谈中获得的数据被录音、转录、编码,并由两名独立的评论者使用主题分析进行分析。结果:访谈显示,这两个项目都在临床角色的范围内运作,主题组织为复杂学习、缓和学习或混合学习。回应强调,临床角色更有可能由特定提供者和家庭之间建立的关系来定义,而不是由两个项目之间的明确界限来定义。结论:儿科综合护理和姑息治疗团队在CMC护理中具有不同的作用和重叠的作用。这种重叠在机构和个人的提供者-照顾者二人组之间可能有所不同。需要进一步的研究来探索共享患者和护理人员对同时利用两个团队的好处和挑战的看法的合作实践。关键信息:这项对CMC提供者的定性研究强调了复杂护理和姑息治疗团队在照顾共同的患者和家庭群体时重叠的角色和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Who Has the Relationship?": Caring for a Shared Population of Children with Medical Complexity.

Background: Many academic pediatric centers care for children with medical complexity (CMC) through established complex care and palliative care programs. There are little prior data investigating best practices for collaboration between these two subspecialties in caring for CMC. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities of pediatric complex care and palliative care teams as identified by providers when caring for a shared population of CMC and their families. Design: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. Settings/Subjects: Pediatric complex care and palliative care providers (physicians and nurse practitioners) actively caring for CMC at academic medical centers in the Midwestern United States. Measurements: Data obtained from semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by two independent reviewers using thematic analysis. Results: Interviews revealed that both programs operate within a spectrum of clinical roles, thematically organized as complex-leaning, palliative-leaning, or blended. Responses highlighted that clinical roles are more likely defined by relationships established between specific providers and families, instead of by clear boundaries between the two programs. Conclusions: Pediatric complex care and palliative care teams provide both distinct and overlapping roles in caring for CMC. This overlap can vary between institutions and individual provider-caregiver dyads. Further studies are needed to explore collaborative practices on shared patients and caregiver perceptions on the benefits and challenges of utilizing both teams concurrently. Key Message: This qualitative study of providers of CMC highlights the overlapping roles and responsibilities between complex care and palliative care teams in caring for a shared population of patients and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients. Grief and Bereavement in Pediatric Palliative Care #502. A Systematic Review of Grief Experiences of Children Who Have Lost a Sibling. Pancreatic Enzyme Supplementation for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer #500. Letter to the Editor: Error in Estimating Prevalence of Iatrogenic Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1