退变性腰椎管狭窄A - D级患者行侧腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123601
Ke Sun, Guangwen Zhou, Zhiye Jiang, Longjian Wang, Guanjie Wei, Honggang Wang
{"title":"退变性腰椎管狭窄A - D级患者行侧腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效。","authors":"Ke Sun, Guangwen Zhou, Zhiye Jiang, Longjian Wang, Guanjie Wei, Honggang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was to evaluate the initial efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), encompassing a spectrum of stenosis severity from minor to extreme cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of 43 patients with DLSS, involving 55 surgical segments, who underwent LLIF. Clinical efficacy and radiographic parameters were recorded during the perioperative period and at the final follow-up. Pursuant to the Schizas' classification criteria, the 55 surgical segments were categorized into 2 groups: the Schizas grade A or B group and the C or D group. Simultaneously, the 43 patients were divided into 2 groups: the minor-moderate stenosis (MM) group and the severe-extreme stenosis (SE) group. Comparative analyses were subsequently conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients successfully underwent the LLIF procedure, without the need for additional posterior decompression surgery. Both 16 MM and 27 SE group patients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical efficacy scores compared to their preoperative baselines (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the MM group and the SE group in postoperative clinical metrics (P > 0.05). Both 23 Schizas grade A or B and 32 C or D group segments exhibited significant postoperative improvements in radiographic parameter values (P < 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under certain indications, patients with varying degrees of DLSS, ranging from mild to extreme, can achieve favorable outcomes through LLIF, and preoperative imaging revealing severe or extreme stenosis does not automatically disqualify patients from undergoing indirect decompression surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Efficacy After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Classified as Schizas Grade A to D.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Sun, Guangwen Zhou, Zhiye Jiang, Longjian Wang, Guanjie Wei, Honggang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was to evaluate the initial efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), encompassing a spectrum of stenosis severity from minor to extreme cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of 43 patients with DLSS, involving 55 surgical segments, who underwent LLIF. Clinical efficacy and radiographic parameters were recorded during the perioperative period and at the final follow-up. Pursuant to the Schizas' classification criteria, the 55 surgical segments were categorized into 2 groups: the Schizas grade A or B group and the C or D group. Simultaneously, the 43 patients were divided into 2 groups: the minor-moderate stenosis (MM) group and the severe-extreme stenosis (SE) group. Comparative analyses were subsequently conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients successfully underwent the LLIF procedure, without the need for additional posterior decompression surgery. Both 16 MM and 27 SE group patients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical efficacy scores compared to their preoperative baselines (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the MM group and the SE group in postoperative clinical metrics (P > 0.05). Both 23 Schizas grade A or B and 32 C or D group segments exhibited significant postoperative improvements in radiographic parameter values (P < 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under certain indications, patients with varying degrees of DLSS, ranging from mild to extreme, can achieve favorable outcomes through LLIF, and preoperative imaging revealing severe or extreme stenosis does not automatically disqualify patients from undergoing indirect decompression surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123601\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄(DLSS)的初步疗效,包括从轻微到极端的狭窄严重程度。方法:回顾性分析43例DLSS患者行LLIF治疗的结果,涉及55个手术节段。在围手术期和最后随访时记录临床疗效和影像学参数。根据Schizas分级标准,将55个手术节段分为Schizas A级或B级(AB)组和C级或D级(CD)组。同时将43例患者分为轻度-中度狭窄(MM)组和重度-极端狭窄(SE)组。随后进行了比较分析。结果:所有患者均成功完成了LLIF手术,无需额外的后路减压手术。16例MM组和27例SE组患者的临床疗效评分与术前基线相比均有显著改善(P0.05)。AB组23节段和CD组32节段术后影像学参数值均有明显改善(P0.05)。结论:在一定的适应症下,不同程度的DLSS(从轻度到重度)患者均可通过LLIF获得良好的预后,术前影像学显示严重或重度狭窄并不意味着患者不适合进行间接减压手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Initial Efficacy After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Classified as Schizas Grade A to D.

Objective: This study was to evaluate the initial efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), encompassing a spectrum of stenosis severity from minor to extreme cases.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of 43 patients with DLSS, involving 55 surgical segments, who underwent LLIF. Clinical efficacy and radiographic parameters were recorded during the perioperative period and at the final follow-up. Pursuant to the Schizas' classification criteria, the 55 surgical segments were categorized into 2 groups: the Schizas grade A or B group and the C or D group. Simultaneously, the 43 patients were divided into 2 groups: the minor-moderate stenosis (MM) group and the severe-extreme stenosis (SE) group. Comparative analyses were subsequently conducted.

Results: All patients successfully underwent the LLIF procedure, without the need for additional posterior decompression surgery. Both 16 MM and 27 SE group patients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical efficacy scores compared to their preoperative baselines (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the MM group and the SE group in postoperative clinical metrics (P > 0.05). Both 23 Schizas grade A or B and 32 C or D group segments exhibited significant postoperative improvements in radiographic parameter values (P < 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Under certain indications, patients with varying degrees of DLSS, ranging from mild to extreme, can achieve favorable outcomes through LLIF, and preoperative imaging revealing severe or extreme stenosis does not automatically disqualify patients from undergoing indirect decompression surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Hemorrhagic Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation: Microelectrode Recording versus Macrostimulation-Does the Technique Matter? Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Model for Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Interventional Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms. Reduced Vertebral Hounsfield Unit Values in the Bridging Group of Ossification-Related Segments in Patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine. The Role of Neuropsychology in the Management of Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Literature Review. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Intersection of Care: Navigating Patient-Hospital Relationships in Neurosurgery".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1