Mohammed Alkhaldi, Bhavana Akilan, Maha Hoteit, Mohamed Elhadidy, Suzanne Morrison
{"title":"2023-2024年期间在加沙实现人权、全民健康覆盖和可持续发展目标的情况不理想。","authors":"Mohammed Alkhaldi, Bhavana Akilan, Maha Hoteit, Mohamed Elhadidy, Suzanne Morrison","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S488944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Israel military occupation, ongoing for over 75 years, has profoundly impacted the health and well-being of Palestinians. Despite longstanding calls for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and sustainable development, the response of global health systems and organizations to crises such as the recent large-scale military assault on Gaza in October 2023 has been inadequate. There is a critical need to examine why these global health approaches have failed and how they can be restructured to address the unique challenges in Gaza effectively. This analysis aims to analyze the shortcomings of global health strategies in the context of the Gaza crisis during 2023-2024, evaluate their alignment with UHC and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and propose actionable solutions to enhance their relevance and effectiveness in conflict-affected settings. The ongoing military assault has rendered Gaza uninhabitable, exacerbating mass human loss, destruction, health insecurity, and widespread social inequities. The crisis has highlighted the erosion of health systems and the inability to meet basic population needs. Global health strategies, as currently implemented, fail to address the specific challenges of Gaza, including ensuring human rights for health, achieving UHC, and advancing SDGs. These failures are rooted in a lack of context-specific adaptation, inadequate accountability, and unresponsive global health diplomacy. The analysis concludes that global health entities and organizations have been largely ineffective in responding to the Gaza crisis, resulting in significant inequities and failures in life-saving actions. To address these challenges, there is an urgent need to tackle the factors behind the ineffective role of these organizations and suboptimal attainment of global goals. This role of global health should be redefined. Reforming the existing global health architecture and shaping well-representative alliances by involving influential actors from the Global South is a priority. These alliances should prioritize accountability, advocacy, and diplomacy while developing innovative and context-specific approaches to safeguard human rights, achieve UHC, and promote sustainable development in Palestine.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3207-3216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal Attainment of Global Goals of Human Rights, Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development Goals in Gaza During 2023-2024.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Alkhaldi, Bhavana Akilan, Maha Hoteit, Mohamed Elhadidy, Suzanne Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S488944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Israel military occupation, ongoing for over 75 years, has profoundly impacted the health and well-being of Palestinians. Despite longstanding calls for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and sustainable development, the response of global health systems and organizations to crises such as the recent large-scale military assault on Gaza in October 2023 has been inadequate. There is a critical need to examine why these global health approaches have failed and how they can be restructured to address the unique challenges in Gaza effectively. This analysis aims to analyze the shortcomings of global health strategies in the context of the Gaza crisis during 2023-2024, evaluate their alignment with UHC and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and propose actionable solutions to enhance their relevance and effectiveness in conflict-affected settings. The ongoing military assault has rendered Gaza uninhabitable, exacerbating mass human loss, destruction, health insecurity, and widespread social inequities. The crisis has highlighted the erosion of health systems and the inability to meet basic population needs. Global health strategies, as currently implemented, fail to address the specific challenges of Gaza, including ensuring human rights for health, achieving UHC, and advancing SDGs. These failures are rooted in a lack of context-specific adaptation, inadequate accountability, and unresponsive global health diplomacy. The analysis concludes that global health entities and organizations have been largely ineffective in responding to the Gaza crisis, resulting in significant inequities and failures in life-saving actions. To address these challenges, there is an urgent need to tackle the factors behind the ineffective role of these organizations and suboptimal attainment of global goals. This role of global health should be redefined. Reforming the existing global health architecture and shaping well-representative alliances by involving influential actors from the Global South is a priority. These alliances should prioritize accountability, advocacy, and diplomacy while developing innovative and context-specific approaches to safeguard human rights, achieve UHC, and promote sustainable development in Palestine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3207-3216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S488944\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S488944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Suboptimal Attainment of Global Goals of Human Rights, Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development Goals in Gaza During 2023-2024.
The Israel military occupation, ongoing for over 75 years, has profoundly impacted the health and well-being of Palestinians. Despite longstanding calls for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and sustainable development, the response of global health systems and organizations to crises such as the recent large-scale military assault on Gaza in October 2023 has been inadequate. There is a critical need to examine why these global health approaches have failed and how they can be restructured to address the unique challenges in Gaza effectively. This analysis aims to analyze the shortcomings of global health strategies in the context of the Gaza crisis during 2023-2024, evaluate their alignment with UHC and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and propose actionable solutions to enhance their relevance and effectiveness in conflict-affected settings. The ongoing military assault has rendered Gaza uninhabitable, exacerbating mass human loss, destruction, health insecurity, and widespread social inequities. The crisis has highlighted the erosion of health systems and the inability to meet basic population needs. Global health strategies, as currently implemented, fail to address the specific challenges of Gaza, including ensuring human rights for health, achieving UHC, and advancing SDGs. These failures are rooted in a lack of context-specific adaptation, inadequate accountability, and unresponsive global health diplomacy. The analysis concludes that global health entities and organizations have been largely ineffective in responding to the Gaza crisis, resulting in significant inequities and failures in life-saving actions. To address these challenges, there is an urgent need to tackle the factors behind the ineffective role of these organizations and suboptimal attainment of global goals. This role of global health should be redefined. Reforming the existing global health architecture and shaping well-representative alliances by involving influential actors from the Global South is a priority. These alliances should prioritize accountability, advocacy, and diplomacy while developing innovative and context-specific approaches to safeguard human rights, achieve UHC, and promote sustainable development in Palestine.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.