Seockhoon Chung, Jiyoung Kim, Dongin Lee, Junseok Ahn, Young Rong Bang, Esther F Afolalu, Seong-Soo Choi, Nicole K Y Tang
{"title":"韩文慢性疼痛患者睡眠疼痛相关信念与态度量表的验证","authors":"Seockhoon Chung, Jiyoung Kim, Dongin Lee, Junseok Ahn, Young Rong Bang, Esther F Afolalu, Seong-Soo Choi, Nicole K Y Tang","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale among patients with chronic pain. Furthermore, we investigated whether pan-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediate the relationship between sleep severity and pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 100 participants with chronic pain were recruited using an anonymous online survey. Their demographic data and responses to pain severity rating scales, comprising the translated Korean version of the PBAS; Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS-16); Metacognition Questionnaire-Insomnia-6 (MCQI-6); and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Korean version of the PBAS scale has two-factor structure. The PBAS was a reliable scale which can measure pain-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep among patients with chronic pain. It showed strong convergent validity with pain severity (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>p</i> < .001), DBAS-16 (<i>r</i> = 0.65, <i>p</i> < .001), MCQI-6 (<i>r</i> = 0.56, <i>p</i> < .001), and ISI (<i>r</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001) scores. Mediation analysis indicated that pain severity directly influenced insomnia severity, with PBAS, DBAS-16, and MCQI-6 scores partially mediating this association. Conversely, insomnia severity was associated with pain severity, with the PBAS score alone mediating this relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Korean PBAS is a reliable and valid rating scale which measures pain-specific, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs among patients with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Korean Version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale Among Patients with Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Seockhoon Chung, Jiyoung Kim, Dongin Lee, Junseok Ahn, Young Rong Bang, Esther F Afolalu, Seong-Soo Choi, Nicole K Y Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale among patients with chronic pain. Furthermore, we investigated whether pan-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediate the relationship between sleep severity and pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 100 participants with chronic pain were recruited using an anonymous online survey. Their demographic data and responses to pain severity rating scales, comprising the translated Korean version of the PBAS; Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS-16); Metacognition Questionnaire-Insomnia-6 (MCQI-6); and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Korean version of the PBAS scale has two-factor structure. The PBAS was a reliable scale which can measure pain-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep among patients with chronic pain. It showed strong convergent validity with pain severity (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>p</i> < .001), DBAS-16 (<i>r</i> = 0.65, <i>p</i> < .001), MCQI-6 (<i>r</i> = 0.56, <i>p</i> < .001), and ISI (<i>r</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001) scores. Mediation analysis indicated that pain severity directly influenced insomnia severity, with PBAS, DBAS-16, and MCQI-6 scores partially mediating this association. Conversely, insomnia severity was associated with pain severity, with the PBAS score alone mediating this relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Korean PBAS is a reliable and valid rating scale which measures pain-specific, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs among patients with chronic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Korean Version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale Among Patients with Chronic Pain.
Objectives: We assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale among patients with chronic pain. Furthermore, we investigated whether pan-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediate the relationship between sleep severity and pain.
Methods: Overall, 100 participants with chronic pain were recruited using an anonymous online survey. Their demographic data and responses to pain severity rating scales, comprising the translated Korean version of the PBAS; Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS-16); Metacognition Questionnaire-Insomnia-6 (MCQI-6); and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were collected.
Results: The Korean version of the PBAS scale has two-factor structure. The PBAS was a reliable scale which can measure pain-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep among patients with chronic pain. It showed strong convergent validity with pain severity (r = 0.61, p < .001), DBAS-16 (r = 0.65, p < .001), MCQI-6 (r = 0.56, p < .001), and ISI (r = 0.68, p < .001) scores. Mediation analysis indicated that pain severity directly influenced insomnia severity, with PBAS, DBAS-16, and MCQI-6 scores partially mediating this association. Conversely, insomnia severity was associated with pain severity, with the PBAS score alone mediating this relationship.
Conclusions: The Korean PBAS is a reliable and valid rating scale which measures pain-specific, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs among patients with chronic pain.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.