大环内酯类抗生素在医院治疗社区获得性肺炎中的应用

Jia Wei, A Sarah Walker, David W Eyre
{"title":"大环内酯类抗生素在医院治疗社区获得性肺炎中的应用","authors":"Jia Wei, A Sarah Walker, David W Eyre","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Current guidelines recommend combining a macrolide with a β-lactam antibiotic for the empirical treatment of moderate-to-high severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however macrolide use is associated with potential adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Methods We analysed electronic health data from 8,872 adults in Oxfordshire, UK, hospitalised with CAP between 01-January-2016 and 19-March-2024, who received either amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav as initial treatment. We examined the effects of adjunctive macrolides on 30-day all-cause mortality, time to hospital discharge, and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, using inverse probability treatment weighting to address confounding by baseline severity. Subgroup analyses by severity and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed were performed. Results There was no evidence of an association between the use of additional macrolides and 30-day mortality, with marginal odds ratios of 1.05 (95%CI 0.75-1.47) for amoxicillin with vs. without macrolide, and 1.12 (0.93-1.34) for co-amoxiclav with vs. without macrolide. No evidence of difference was found in time to discharge from additional macrolides to amoxicillin (restricted mean days lost +1.76 [-1.66,+5.19]), or co-amoxiclav (+0.44 [-1.63,+2.51]). There was also no evidence that macrolide use was associated with SOFA score decreases. Results were consistent across stratified analyses by pneumonia severity, and remained broadly similar in sensitivity analyses with missing data imputed. Conclusions At a population level, the addition of macrolides was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for CAP patients. The potential advantages of combining macrolides with a β-lactam antibiotic in CAP treatment should be balanced against the risks of adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of macrolide antibiotics for hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"Jia Wei, A Sarah Walker, David W Eyre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiae639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Current guidelines recommend combining a macrolide with a β-lactam antibiotic for the empirical treatment of moderate-to-high severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however macrolide use is associated with potential adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Methods We analysed electronic health data from 8,872 adults in Oxfordshire, UK, hospitalised with CAP between 01-January-2016 and 19-March-2024, who received either amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav as initial treatment. We examined the effects of adjunctive macrolides on 30-day all-cause mortality, time to hospital discharge, and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, using inverse probability treatment weighting to address confounding by baseline severity. Subgroup analyses by severity and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed were performed. Results There was no evidence of an association between the use of additional macrolides and 30-day mortality, with marginal odds ratios of 1.05 (95%CI 0.75-1.47) for amoxicillin with vs. without macrolide, and 1.12 (0.93-1.34) for co-amoxiclav with vs. without macrolide. No evidence of difference was found in time to discharge from additional macrolides to amoxicillin (restricted mean days lost +1.76 [-1.66,+5.19]), or co-amoxiclav (+0.44 [-1.63,+2.51]). There was also no evidence that macrolide use was associated with SOFA score decreases. Results were consistent across stratified analyses by pneumonia severity, and remained broadly similar in sensitivity analyses with missing data imputed. Conclusions At a population level, the addition of macrolides was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for CAP patients. The potential advantages of combining macrolides with a β-lactam antibiotic in CAP treatment should be balanced against the risks of adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的指南推荐将大环内酯类药物与β-内酰胺类抗生素联合用于中重度至重度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的经导性治疗;然而,大环内酯类药物的使用与潜在的不良事件和抗菌素耐药性有关。方法我们分析了2016年1月1日至2024年3月19日期间英国牛津郡8872名因CAP住院的成年人的电子健康数据,这些成年人接受阿莫西林或联合阿莫昔拉夫作为初始治疗。我们检查了辅助大环内酯类药物对30天全因死亡率、出院时间和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分变化的影响,使用逆概率治疗加权来解决基线严重程度的混淆问题。采用纳入缺失协变量的严重性和敏感性分析进行亚组分析。结果:没有证据表明额外使用大环内酯类药物与30天死亡率之间存在关联,阿莫西林与不使用大环内酯类药物的边际比值比为1.05 (95%CI 0.75-1.47),联合阿莫西林与不使用大环内酯类药物的边际比值比为1.12(0.93-1.34)。从大环内酯类药物到阿莫西林(限制平均损失天数+1.76[-1.66,+5.19])或联合阿莫西林(+0.44[-1.63,+2.51])的出院时间没有差异。也没有证据表明大环内酯类药物的使用与SOFA评分降低有关。结果在肺炎严重程度的分层分析中是一致的,在输入缺失数据的敏感性分析中也大致相似。在人群水平上,大环内酯类药物的加入与CAP患者临床结果的改善无关。大环内酯类药物联合β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗CAP的潜在优势应与不良反应和抗菌素耐药性风险相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addition of macrolide antibiotics for hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
Background Current guidelines recommend combining a macrolide with a β-lactam antibiotic for the empirical treatment of moderate-to-high severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however macrolide use is associated with potential adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Methods We analysed electronic health data from 8,872 adults in Oxfordshire, UK, hospitalised with CAP between 01-January-2016 and 19-March-2024, who received either amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav as initial treatment. We examined the effects of adjunctive macrolides on 30-day all-cause mortality, time to hospital discharge, and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, using inverse probability treatment weighting to address confounding by baseline severity. Subgroup analyses by severity and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed were performed. Results There was no evidence of an association between the use of additional macrolides and 30-day mortality, with marginal odds ratios of 1.05 (95%CI 0.75-1.47) for amoxicillin with vs. without macrolide, and 1.12 (0.93-1.34) for co-amoxiclav with vs. without macrolide. No evidence of difference was found in time to discharge from additional macrolides to amoxicillin (restricted mean days lost +1.76 [-1.66,+5.19]), or co-amoxiclav (+0.44 [-1.63,+2.51]). There was also no evidence that macrolide use was associated with SOFA score decreases. Results were consistent across stratified analyses by pneumonia severity, and remained broadly similar in sensitivity analyses with missing data imputed. Conclusions At a population level, the addition of macrolides was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for CAP patients. The potential advantages of combining macrolides with a β-lactam antibiotic in CAP treatment should be balanced against the risks of adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of attaining an aggressive PK/PD target with continuous infusion beta-lactams on the clinical efficacy of targeted therapy of early post-transplant Gram-negative infections in critically ill OLT recipients. An interim analysis of a 3-year prospective, observational, study Antibody-Based Antigen Delivery to Dendritic Cells as a Vaccination Strategy Against Ebola Virus Disease The Current and Future Burden of Long COVID in the United States (U.S.) Looking Forward: The Journal of Infectious Diseases in 2025. Interleukin-6 is significantly increased in severe pneumonia after allo-HSCT and might induce lung injury via IL-6/sIL-6R/JAK1/STAT3 pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1