人工智能能提高患者教育材料的可读性吗?一个系统的回顾和叙述综合。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1111/imj.16607
Mohamed Nasra, Rimsha Jaffri, Davor Pavlin-Premrl, Hong Kuan Kok, Ali Khabaza, Christen Barras, Lee-Anne Slater, Anousha Yazdabadi, Justin Moore, Jeremy Russell, Paul Smith, Ronil V. Chandra, Mark Brooks, Ashu Jhamb, Winston Chong, Julian Maingard, Hamed Asadi
{"title":"人工智能能提高患者教育材料的可读性吗?一个系统的回顾和叙述综合。","authors":"Mohamed Nasra,&nbsp;Rimsha Jaffri,&nbsp;Davor Pavlin-Premrl,&nbsp;Hong Kuan Kok,&nbsp;Ali Khabaza,&nbsp;Christen Barras,&nbsp;Lee-Anne Slater,&nbsp;Anousha Yazdabadi,&nbsp;Justin Moore,&nbsp;Jeremy Russell,&nbsp;Paul Smith,&nbsp;Ronil V. Chandra,&nbsp;Mark Brooks,&nbsp;Ashu Jhamb,&nbsp;Winston Chong,&nbsp;Julian Maingard,&nbsp;Hamed Asadi","doi":"10.1111/imj.16607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Enhancing patient comprehension of their health is crucial in improving health outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in distilling medical information into a conversational, legible format can potentially enhance health literacy. This review aims to examine the accuracy, reliability, comprehensiveness and readability of medical patient education materials (PEMs) simplified by AI models. A systematic review was conducted searching for articles assessing outcomes of use of AI in simplifying PEMs. Inclusion criteria are as follows: publication between January 2019 and June 2023, various modalities of AI, English language, AI use in PEMs and including physicians and/or patients. An inductive thematic approach was utilised to code for unifying topics which were qualitatively analysed. Twenty studies were included, and seven themes were identified (reproducibility, accessibility and ease of use, emotional support and user satisfaction, readability, data security, accuracy and reliability and comprehensiveness). AI effectively simplified PEMs, with reproducibility rates up to 90.7% in specific domains. User satisfaction exceeded 85% in AI-generated materials. AI models showed promising readability improvements, with ChatGPT achieving 100% post-simplification readability scores. AI's performance in accuracy and reliability was mixed, with occasional lack of comprehensiveness and inaccuracies, particularly when addressing complex medical topics. AI models accurately simplified basic tasks but lacked soft skills and personalisation. These limitations can be addressed with higher-calibre models combined with prompt engineering. In conclusion, the literature reveals a scope for AI to enhance patient health literacy through medical PEMs. Further refinement is needed to improve AI's accuracy and reliability, especially when simplifying complex medical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"20-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16607","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can artificial intelligence improve patient educational material readability? A systematic review and narrative synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Nasra,&nbsp;Rimsha Jaffri,&nbsp;Davor Pavlin-Premrl,&nbsp;Hong Kuan Kok,&nbsp;Ali Khabaza,&nbsp;Christen Barras,&nbsp;Lee-Anne Slater,&nbsp;Anousha Yazdabadi,&nbsp;Justin Moore,&nbsp;Jeremy Russell,&nbsp;Paul Smith,&nbsp;Ronil V. Chandra,&nbsp;Mark Brooks,&nbsp;Ashu Jhamb,&nbsp;Winston Chong,&nbsp;Julian Maingard,&nbsp;Hamed Asadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.16607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Enhancing patient comprehension of their health is crucial in improving health outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in distilling medical information into a conversational, legible format can potentially enhance health literacy. This review aims to examine the accuracy, reliability, comprehensiveness and readability of medical patient education materials (PEMs) simplified by AI models. A systematic review was conducted searching for articles assessing outcomes of use of AI in simplifying PEMs. Inclusion criteria are as follows: publication between January 2019 and June 2023, various modalities of AI, English language, AI use in PEMs and including physicians and/or patients. An inductive thematic approach was utilised to code for unifying topics which were qualitatively analysed. Twenty studies were included, and seven themes were identified (reproducibility, accessibility and ease of use, emotional support and user satisfaction, readability, data security, accuracy and reliability and comprehensiveness). AI effectively simplified PEMs, with reproducibility rates up to 90.7% in specific domains. User satisfaction exceeded 85% in AI-generated materials. AI models showed promising readability improvements, with ChatGPT achieving 100% post-simplification readability scores. AI's performance in accuracy and reliability was mixed, with occasional lack of comprehensiveness and inaccuracies, particularly when addressing complex medical topics. AI models accurately simplified basic tasks but lacked soft skills and personalisation. These limitations can be addressed with higher-calibre models combined with prompt engineering. In conclusion, the literature reveals a scope for AI to enhance patient health literacy through medical PEMs. Further refinement is needed to improve AI's accuracy and reliability, especially when simplifying complex medical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"20-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16607\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强患者对自身健康状况的了解对于改善健康结果至关重要。将人工智能(AI)整合到将医疗信息提炼成可对话、易读的格式中,可以潜在地提高健康素养。本综述旨在检验人工智能模型简化的医疗患者教育材料(PEMs)的准确性、可靠性、全面性和可读性。我们进行了一项系统综述,检索了评估人工智能在简化PEMs中的应用结果的文章。纳入标准如下:2019年1月至2023年6月之间的出版物,人工智能的各种模式,英语语言,人工智能在PEMs(包括医生和/或患者)中的使用。采用归纳主题方法对统一主题进行编码,并对主题进行定性分析。纳入了20项研究,确定了7个主题(可重复性、可及性和易用性、情感支持和用户满意度、可读性、数据安全性、准确性和可靠性以及全面性)。人工智能有效地简化了PEMs,在特定领域的重现率高达90.7%。人工智能生成材料的用户满意度超过85%。人工智能模型显示出有希望的可读性改进,ChatGPT在简化后的可读性得分达到100%。人工智能在准确性和可靠性方面的表现好坏参半,偶尔会缺乏全面性和不准确性,特别是在处理复杂的医学主题时。人工智能模型准确地简化了基本任务,但缺乏软技能和个性化。这些限制可以通过高质量的模型和及时的工程来解决。总之,文献揭示了人工智能通过医学PEMs提高患者健康素养的范围。需要进一步改进以提高人工智能的准确性和可靠性,特别是在简化复杂的医疗信息时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can artificial intelligence improve patient educational material readability? A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Enhancing patient comprehension of their health is crucial in improving health outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in distilling medical information into a conversational, legible format can potentially enhance health literacy. This review aims to examine the accuracy, reliability, comprehensiveness and readability of medical patient education materials (PEMs) simplified by AI models. A systematic review was conducted searching for articles assessing outcomes of use of AI in simplifying PEMs. Inclusion criteria are as follows: publication between January 2019 and June 2023, various modalities of AI, English language, AI use in PEMs and including physicians and/or patients. An inductive thematic approach was utilised to code for unifying topics which were qualitatively analysed. Twenty studies were included, and seven themes were identified (reproducibility, accessibility and ease of use, emotional support and user satisfaction, readability, data security, accuracy and reliability and comprehensiveness). AI effectively simplified PEMs, with reproducibility rates up to 90.7% in specific domains. User satisfaction exceeded 85% in AI-generated materials. AI models showed promising readability improvements, with ChatGPT achieving 100% post-simplification readability scores. AI's performance in accuracy and reliability was mixed, with occasional lack of comprehensiveness and inaccuracies, particularly when addressing complex medical topics. AI models accurately simplified basic tasks but lacked soft skills and personalisation. These limitations can be addressed with higher-calibre models combined with prompt engineering. In conclusion, the literature reveals a scope for AI to enhance patient health literacy through medical PEMs. Further refinement is needed to improve AI's accuracy and reliability, especially when simplifying complex medical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
'Many heads are better than one': a paradigm shift towards a multidisciplinary infective endocarditis management approach. A new era in myeloma: the advent of chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells and bispecific antibodies. Non-invasive ventilation in cystic fibrosis: the Australian experience over the past 24 years. Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors among Aboriginal people with type 2 diabetes in remote Northern Territory: 2012 to 2020. Better off alone? Artificial intelligence can demonstrate superior performance without clinician input.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1