检测羟氯喹视网膜病变的新型视网膜电图设备:诊断准确性和可行性研究的研究方案。

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898
Chan Ning Lee, Hatem A Wafa, George Murphy, James Galloway, Omar A Mahroo, Timothy L Jackson
{"title":"检测羟氯喹视网膜病变的新型视网膜电图设备:诊断准确性和可行性研究的研究方案。","authors":"Chan Ning Lee, Hatem A Wafa, George Murphy, James Galloway, Omar A Mahroo, Timothy L Jackson","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Annual screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy is recommended, and electroretinography (ERG) is considered a gold-standard test, but there are screening shortfalls and standard ERG is burdensome and has limited availability. Newer, portable ERG devices using skin-based electrodes may increase screening capacity but need validation. This study aims to determine initial device accuracies and feasibility of further research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Prospective diagnostic device accuracy and feasibility study comparing novel ERG devices to standard screening tests. Three groups of 35 participants on HCQ, categorised by HCQ retinopathy (definite, possible and no retinopathy), and 35 healthy control participants, recruited by consecutive sampling, will have full field and multifocal ERG index tests, delivered using skin-contact electrodes by two devices-RETEval full-field and UTAS multifocal ERG, both manufactured by LKC Technologies (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA), compared with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence reference tests graded by two masked, independent retinal specialists. Eligible HCQ participants will either have diagnosed HCQ retinopathy or be eligible for screening per UK guidelines. Healthy control participants will have no prior HCQ exposure and be of similar age and sex to HCQ participants. Primary outcome is device-specific sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes include the effect of dilation on device outputs, analysis of discriminatory waveforms, device acceptability and recruitment rate. Safety outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events and device events.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Cambridge East ethics committee gave a favourable opinion (24/EE/0011, 23/02/2024). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed ophthalmology journal.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel electroretinography devices to detect hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Chan Ning Lee, Hatem A Wafa, George Murphy, James Galloway, Omar A Mahroo, Timothy L Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Annual screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy is recommended, and electroretinography (ERG) is considered a gold-standard test, but there are screening shortfalls and standard ERG is burdensome and has limited availability. Newer, portable ERG devices using skin-based electrodes may increase screening capacity but need validation. This study aims to determine initial device accuracies and feasibility of further research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Prospective diagnostic device accuracy and feasibility study comparing novel ERG devices to standard screening tests. Three groups of 35 participants on HCQ, categorised by HCQ retinopathy (definite, possible and no retinopathy), and 35 healthy control participants, recruited by consecutive sampling, will have full field and multifocal ERG index tests, delivered using skin-contact electrodes by two devices-RETEval full-field and UTAS multifocal ERG, both manufactured by LKC Technologies (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA), compared with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence reference tests graded by two masked, independent retinal specialists. Eligible HCQ participants will either have diagnosed HCQ retinopathy or be eligible for screening per UK guidelines. Healthy control participants will have no prior HCQ exposure and be of similar age and sex to HCQ participants. Primary outcome is device-specific sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes include the effect of dilation on device outputs, analysis of discriminatory waveforms, device acceptability and recruitment rate. Safety outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events and device events.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Cambridge East ethics committee gave a favourable opinion (24/EE/0011, 23/02/2024). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed ophthalmology journal.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推荐每年对羟氯喹(HCQ)视网膜病变进行筛查,视网膜电图(ERG)被认为是一种金标准测试,但筛查存在不足,标准ERG负担沉重,可用性有限。使用皮肤电极的新型便携式ERG设备可能会增加筛查能力,但需要验证。本研究旨在确定初始装置的精度和进一步研究的可行性。方法与分析:前瞻性诊断设备的准确性和可行性研究,将新型ERG设备与标准筛选试验进行比较。三组35名HCQ参与者,根据HCQ视网膜病变(明确、可能和无视网膜病变)和35名健康对照参与者,通过连续抽样招募,将进行全视野和多焦点ERG指数测试,使用皮肤接触电极,由LKC Technologies (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA)生产的reteval全视野和UTAS多焦点ERG设备进行测试。与光谱域光学相干断层扫描和由两位蒙面独立视网膜专家分级的自体荧光参考测试进行比较。符合条件的HCQ参与者要么被诊断为HCQ视网膜病变,要么符合英国指南的筛查条件。健康对照者将没有HCQ暴露史,年龄和性别与HCQ参与者相似。主要结果是器械特异性的敏感性和特异性。次要结果包括膨胀对设备输出的影响,区分波形的分析,设备的可接受性和招募率。安全性结果包括不良和严重不良事件以及器械事件。伦理和传播:剑桥东部伦理委员会给出了有利的意见(24/EE/ 0011,2024年2月23日)。研究结果将发表在同行评议的眼科杂志上。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel electroretinography devices to detect hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.

Introduction: Annual screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy is recommended, and electroretinography (ERG) is considered a gold-standard test, but there are screening shortfalls and standard ERG is burdensome and has limited availability. Newer, portable ERG devices using skin-based electrodes may increase screening capacity but need validation. This study aims to determine initial device accuracies and feasibility of further research.

Methods and analysis: Prospective diagnostic device accuracy and feasibility study comparing novel ERG devices to standard screening tests. Three groups of 35 participants on HCQ, categorised by HCQ retinopathy (definite, possible and no retinopathy), and 35 healthy control participants, recruited by consecutive sampling, will have full field and multifocal ERG index tests, delivered using skin-contact electrodes by two devices-RETEval full-field and UTAS multifocal ERG, both manufactured by LKC Technologies (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA), compared with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence reference tests graded by two masked, independent retinal specialists. Eligible HCQ participants will either have diagnosed HCQ retinopathy or be eligible for screening per UK guidelines. Healthy control participants will have no prior HCQ exposure and be of similar age and sex to HCQ participants. Primary outcome is device-specific sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes include the effect of dilation on device outputs, analysis of discriminatory waveforms, device acceptability and recruitment rate. Safety outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events and device events.

Ethics and dissemination: Cambridge East ethics committee gave a favourable opinion (24/EE/0011, 23/02/2024). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed ophthalmology journal.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Willingness to donate eyes and associated factors among adults in Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods approach. Association of arterial stiffness and eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of ethnicity and other sociodemographic factors on attendance at ophthalmology appointments following referral from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme: a retrospective cohort study. Comparative evaluation of funduscopy, PCR and serology in the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis at ECWA Eye Hospital, Kano. Deep learning-based anterior segment identification and parameter assessment of primary angle closure disease in ultrasound biomicroscopy images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1