OAB的临床特点及药物治疗现状:理想与现实。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x
Kazuna Tsubouchi, Hisatomi Arima, Taiki Emoto, Hiroshi Nakazawa, Takahiro Kitano, Masashi Mikami, Chikao Aoyagi, Hiroshi Matsuzaki, Kosuke Tominaga, Naotaka Gunge, Takeshi Miyazaki, Yu Okabe, Nobuyuki Nakamura, Yuichiro Fukuhara, Masahiro Tachibana, Chizuru Nakagawa, Fumihiro Yamazaki, Nobuhiro Haga
{"title":"OAB的临床特点及药物治疗现状:理想与现实。","authors":"Kazuna Tsubouchi,&nbsp;Hisatomi Arima,&nbsp;Taiki Emoto,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nakazawa,&nbsp;Takahiro Kitano,&nbsp;Masashi Mikami,&nbsp;Chikao Aoyagi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Kosuke Tominaga,&nbsp;Naotaka Gunge,&nbsp;Takeshi Miyazaki,&nbsp;Yu Okabe,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuichiro Fukuhara,&nbsp;Masahiro Tachibana,&nbsp;Chizuru Nakagawa,&nbsp;Fumihiro Yamazaki,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Haga","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The present study aimed to investigate the prescribing patterns of anticholinergics (anti-AChR) or β3-adrenergic agonists (β<sub>3</sub>A) in the pharmacotherapy of overactive bladder (OAB) and to evaluate the differences in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) between the two types of drugs using a large-scale medical claims database.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study was conducted using the JMDC claims database between May 2015 and April 2023. Patient characteristics, prescription and treatment patterns of anti-AChR and β<sub>3</sub>A, and the incidence of AEs have been described.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 70,936 patients were analyzed [mean age, 53.6 (standard deviation: 12.3) years]. Among women (48.5%; 34,439), 21.4% initially received anti-AChR and 27.2% received β<sub>3</sub>A; among men (51.5%; 36,497), 17.1% initially received anti-AChR and 34.3% received β<sub>3</sub>A. Most patients (79.6%; women, 83.5%; men, 75.8%) visited clinics. About 10% of patients had a treatment change: 5.6% switched the drug type (change from anti-AChR to β<sub>3</sub>A or vice versa), and 4.0% had an add-on of another drug type. The incidence rate of treatment change per 100 patient-years was higher with β<sub>3</sub>A in both women (12.39) and men (13.65). In the multivariable analysis, initial prescription with anti-AChR compared with β<sub>3</sub>A did not show any association with the risk of AEs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This large-scale database study revealed that treatment for OAB is often initiated with β<sub>3</sub>A and prescribed mainly at clinics. Changes or additions to initial prescriptions were as low as about 5%, indicating that raising awareness among physicians treating OAB is particularly important to improve the quality of life of patients with OAB. Our study also showed that the incidence of AEs was not associated with the initially prescribed drug type. Continued exploration is warranted to further clarify the risk of AEs with each prescription.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 2","pages":"1094 - 1107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Features and Current Pharmacotherapy of OAB in Practice: Ideal and Reality\",\"authors\":\"Kazuna Tsubouchi,&nbsp;Hisatomi Arima,&nbsp;Taiki Emoto,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nakazawa,&nbsp;Takahiro Kitano,&nbsp;Masashi Mikami,&nbsp;Chikao Aoyagi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Kosuke Tominaga,&nbsp;Naotaka Gunge,&nbsp;Takeshi Miyazaki,&nbsp;Yu Okabe,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuichiro Fukuhara,&nbsp;Masahiro Tachibana,&nbsp;Chizuru Nakagawa,&nbsp;Fumihiro Yamazaki,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Haga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The present study aimed to investigate the prescribing patterns of anticholinergics (anti-AChR) or β3-adrenergic agonists (β<sub>3</sub>A) in the pharmacotherapy of overactive bladder (OAB) and to evaluate the differences in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) between the two types of drugs using a large-scale medical claims database.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study was conducted using the JMDC claims database between May 2015 and April 2023. Patient characteristics, prescription and treatment patterns of anti-AChR and β<sub>3</sub>A, and the incidence of AEs have been described.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 70,936 patients were analyzed [mean age, 53.6 (standard deviation: 12.3) years]. Among women (48.5%; 34,439), 21.4% initially received anti-AChR and 27.2% received β<sub>3</sub>A; among men (51.5%; 36,497), 17.1% initially received anti-AChR and 34.3% received β<sub>3</sub>A. Most patients (79.6%; women, 83.5%; men, 75.8%) visited clinics. About 10% of patients had a treatment change: 5.6% switched the drug type (change from anti-AChR to β<sub>3</sub>A or vice versa), and 4.0% had an add-on of another drug type. The incidence rate of treatment change per 100 patient-years was higher with β<sub>3</sub>A in both women (12.39) and men (13.65). In the multivariable analysis, initial prescription with anti-AChR compared with β<sub>3</sub>A did not show any association with the risk of AEs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This large-scale database study revealed that treatment for OAB is often initiated with β<sub>3</sub>A and prescribed mainly at clinics. Changes or additions to initial prescriptions were as low as about 5%, indicating that raising awareness among physicians treating OAB is particularly important to improve the quality of life of patients with OAB. Our study also showed that the incidence of AEs was not associated with the initially prescribed drug type. Continued exploration is warranted to further clarify the risk of AEs with each prescription.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"1094 - 1107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03070-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在探讨抗胆碱能药物(anti-AChR)或β3-肾上腺素能激动剂(β3A)在药物治疗膀胱过动症(OAB)中的处方模式,并利用大型医疗索赔数据库评估两种药物不良事件(ae)频率的差异。方法:本队列研究于2015年5月至2023年4月期间使用JMDC索赔数据库进行。本文描述了抗achr和β3A的患者特征、处方和治疗模式以及ae的发生率。结果:总共分析了70,936例患者[平均年龄53.6岁(标准差:12.3)岁]。女性占48.5%;34,439), 21.4%最初接受抗achr治疗,27.2%接受β3A治疗;男性占51.5%;36,497), 17.1%最初接受抗achr治疗,34.3%接受β3A治疗。多数患者(79.6%;女性,83.5%;男性(75.8%)去过诊所。大约10%的患者改变了治疗方法:5.6%的患者改变了药物类型(从抗achr改为β3A或反之亦然),4.0%的患者增加了另一种药物类型。女性(12.39)和男性(13.65)的β3A治疗改变发生率均高于男性(12.39)。在多变量分析中,与β3A相比,初始处方抗achr与ae的风险没有任何关联。结论:这项大规模的数据库研究表明,OAB的治疗通常以β3A开始,主要在诊所开处方。改变或增加初始处方的比例低至约5%,表明提高治疗OAB的医生的认识对改善OAB患者的生活质量尤为重要。我们的研究还表明,不良反应的发生率与最初处方的药物类型无关。需要继续研究以进一步明确每种处方的不良反应风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Features and Current Pharmacotherapy of OAB in Practice: Ideal and Reality

Introduction

The present study aimed to investigate the prescribing patterns of anticholinergics (anti-AChR) or β3-adrenergic agonists (β3A) in the pharmacotherapy of overactive bladder (OAB) and to evaluate the differences in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) between the two types of drugs using a large-scale medical claims database.

Methods

This cohort study was conducted using the JMDC claims database between May 2015 and April 2023. Patient characteristics, prescription and treatment patterns of anti-AChR and β3A, and the incidence of AEs have been described.

Results

Overall, 70,936 patients were analyzed [mean age, 53.6 (standard deviation: 12.3) years]. Among women (48.5%; 34,439), 21.4% initially received anti-AChR and 27.2% received β3A; among men (51.5%; 36,497), 17.1% initially received anti-AChR and 34.3% received β3A. Most patients (79.6%; women, 83.5%; men, 75.8%) visited clinics. About 10% of patients had a treatment change: 5.6% switched the drug type (change from anti-AChR to β3A or vice versa), and 4.0% had an add-on of another drug type. The incidence rate of treatment change per 100 patient-years was higher with β3A in both women (12.39) and men (13.65). In the multivariable analysis, initial prescription with anti-AChR compared with β3A did not show any association with the risk of AEs.

Conclusion

This large-scale database study revealed that treatment for OAB is often initiated with β3A and prescribed mainly at clinics. Changes or additions to initial prescriptions were as low as about 5%, indicating that raising awareness among physicians treating OAB is particularly important to improve the quality of life of patients with OAB. Our study also showed that the incidence of AEs was not associated with the initially prescribed drug type. Continued exploration is warranted to further clarify the risk of AEs with each prescription.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Onset and Long-Term Maintenance of Optimal Itch Response in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: Post Hoc Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials. LymphoTEC: a Retrospective Real-World Study on Lymphocyte Reconstitution After Lymphopenia in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Dimethyl Fumarate in France. Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD): Back to the Future. Real-world Outcomes Following Biologic Initiation in US Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Motor Function and Safety of Nusinersen and Risdiplam in Asian Patients with Types 2-4 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1