Lucía Aragone, Mariana Toffolo Pasquini, Raul Croceri, Pablo Medina, Daniel Pirchi
{"title":"腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中自夹持补片手术时间、术后疼痛及复发的比较研究。","authors":"Lucía Aragone, Mariana Toffolo Pasquini, Raul Croceri, Pablo Medina, Daniel Pirchi","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), fixation means for meshes (FMMs) are commonly used to reduce hernia recurrence risk. Their use may result in post-operative pain (PP) and may even increase surgical time (ST). Recently, self-gripping meshes (SGMs) have been developed, which leave aside fixation devices; they could potentially reduce PP and even decrease ST. Our primary outcome was to compare ST, PP and recurrence rates in LIHR using SGM versus FMM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A comparative retrospective study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent LIHR with transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach from January to December 2022 in a high-volume centre were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of mesh used in surgery (SGM vs. FMM). Demographic variables, hernia type and size, mesh type and size, ST, PP, recurrence and other morbidities were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 411 LIHRs were performed during the period, of which 283 were included in the study. Of these, 234 patients were repaired with FMM and 49 with SGM. ST had a statistically significant reduction in the SGM group (P = 0.0004) with a mean time of 58.9 min (±13.6), compared to 68.1 min (±18.9) for the FMM group. A trend towards lower PP in the SGM group was noted (P = 0.08). No recurrences were found in the SGM group with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range: 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGMs have proven to be a safe, efficient and fast for LIHR in our series. They are a feasible alternative for LIHR, reducing ST and potentially reducing PP. Prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm this trend, along with a longer follow-up period to determine potential advantages in terms of recurrences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study about surgical time, post-operative pain and recurrence.\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Aragone, Mariana Toffolo Pasquini, Raul Croceri, Pablo Medina, Daniel Pirchi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), fixation means for meshes (FMMs) are commonly used to reduce hernia recurrence risk. Their use may result in post-operative pain (PP) and may even increase surgical time (ST). Recently, self-gripping meshes (SGMs) have been developed, which leave aside fixation devices; they could potentially reduce PP and even decrease ST. Our primary outcome was to compare ST, PP and recurrence rates in LIHR using SGM versus FMM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A comparative retrospective study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent LIHR with transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach from January to December 2022 in a high-volume centre were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of mesh used in surgery (SGM vs. FMM). Demographic variables, hernia type and size, mesh type and size, ST, PP, recurrence and other morbidities were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 411 LIHRs were performed during the period, of which 283 were included in the study. Of these, 234 patients were repaired with FMM and 49 with SGM. ST had a statistically significant reduction in the SGM group (P = 0.0004) with a mean time of 58.9 min (±13.6), compared to 68.1 min (±18.9) for the FMM group. A trend towards lower PP in the SGM group was noted (P = 0.08). No recurrences were found in the SGM group with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range: 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGMs have proven to be a safe, efficient and fast for LIHR in our series. They are a feasible alternative for LIHR, reducing ST and potentially reducing PP. Prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm this trend, along with a longer follow-up period to determine potential advantages in terms of recurrences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)中,常用补片固定手段(fmm)来降低疝复发风险。它们的使用可能导致术后疼痛(PP),甚至可能增加手术时间(ST)。最近,自夹持网格(SGMs)被开发出来,它不需要固定装置;我们的主要结果是比较SGM和FMM在LIHR中的ST、PP和复发率。患者与方法:采用前瞻性病例登记的比较回顾性研究。对2022年1月至12月在大容量中心接受经腹腹膜前入路LIHR的所有患者进行分析。根据手术中使用的补片类型将患者分为两组(SGM vs. FMM)。比较两组人口统计学变量、疝类型和大小、补片类型和大小、ST、PP、复发率等发病率。结果:期间共进行了411例lihr,其中283例纳入本研究。其中,234例患者采用FMM修复,49例采用SGM修复。SGM组ST降低具有统计学意义(P = 0.0004),平均时间为58.9 min(±13.6),而FMM组为68.1 min(±18.9)。SGM组有降低PP的趋势(P = 0.08)。在中位随访18个月(四分位数间隔:3)的SGM组中未发现复发。结论:在我们的研究中,SGM已被证明是一种安全、有效和快速的治疗LIHR的方法。它们是LIHR的可行替代方案,可以减少ST和潜在的PP。需要前瞻性随机试验来证实这一趋势,同时需要更长的随访时间来确定复发方面的潜在优势。
Self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study about surgical time, post-operative pain and recurrence.
Introduction: In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), fixation means for meshes (FMMs) are commonly used to reduce hernia recurrence risk. Their use may result in post-operative pain (PP) and may even increase surgical time (ST). Recently, self-gripping meshes (SGMs) have been developed, which leave aside fixation devices; they could potentially reduce PP and even decrease ST. Our primary outcome was to compare ST, PP and recurrence rates in LIHR using SGM versus FMM.
Patients and methods: A comparative retrospective study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent LIHR with transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach from January to December 2022 in a high-volume centre were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of mesh used in surgery (SGM vs. FMM). Demographic variables, hernia type and size, mesh type and size, ST, PP, recurrence and other morbidities were compared between the groups.
Results: A total of 411 LIHRs were performed during the period, of which 283 were included in the study. Of these, 234 patients were repaired with FMM and 49 with SGM. ST had a statistically significant reduction in the SGM group (P = 0.0004) with a mean time of 58.9 min (±13.6), compared to 68.1 min (±18.9) for the FMM group. A trend towards lower PP in the SGM group was noted (P = 0.08). No recurrences were found in the SGM group with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range: 3).
Conclusions: SGMs have proven to be a safe, efficient and fast for LIHR in our series. They are a feasible alternative for LIHR, reducing ST and potentially reducing PP. Prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm this trend, along with a longer follow-up period to determine potential advantages in terms of recurrences.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.