邻里剥夺与妊娠期糖尿病的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1177/10105395241305671
Arathi P Rao, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Lakshmi Thangavelu, Rangaswamy Roopashree, Pawan Sharma, Madan Lal, Amit Barwl, Garbham Venkata Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Sanjit Sah, Kumud Pant, Prakasini Satapathy
{"title":"邻里剥夺与妊娠期糖尿病的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Arathi P Rao, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Lakshmi Thangavelu, Rangaswamy Roopashree, Pawan Sharma, Madan Lal, Amit Barwl, Garbham Venkata Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Sanjit Sah, Kumud Pant, Prakasini Satapathy","doi":"10.1177/10105395241305671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major global health concern, affecting maternal and child health. Although genetic predispositions and individual medical histories are well-recognized risk factors, emerging research suggests a significant impact of external factors like neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the association between neighborhood deprivation and GDM incidence. We searched multiple databases up to January 10, 2024, for studies linking neighborhood deprivation with GDM. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined criteria, with the Nested Knowledge software assisting in screening and data extraction. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a random-effects model computed the pooled relative risk (RR) using R software, version 4.3. The review included six studies varying significantly in design, sample sizes, and deprivation assessment methods. The meta-analysis combined data from five studies totaling 15 827 participants from the least deprived and 18 147 from the most deprived neighborhoods, yielding an RR of 0.909 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.566, 1.461], <i>P</i> = .607), indicating a non-significant lower risk of GDM in more deprived groups. A substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 70%) was observed, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. This analysis suggests that living in a deprived neighborhood does not significantly alter GDM risk, underscoring the necessity for further research to refine public health strategies and interventions. The variability in neighborhood deprivation definitions and potential unaccounted confounding factors highlight the need for comprehensive studies, especially from low-income and middle-income countries, to elucidate the intricate links between socioeconomic factors and GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"10105395241305671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Neighborhood Deprivation and Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arathi P Rao, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Lakshmi Thangavelu, Rangaswamy Roopashree, Pawan Sharma, Madan Lal, Amit Barwl, Garbham Venkata Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Sanjit Sah, Kumud Pant, Prakasini Satapathy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10105395241305671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major global health concern, affecting maternal and child health. Although genetic predispositions and individual medical histories are well-recognized risk factors, emerging research suggests a significant impact of external factors like neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the association between neighborhood deprivation and GDM incidence. We searched multiple databases up to January 10, 2024, for studies linking neighborhood deprivation with GDM. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined criteria, with the Nested Knowledge software assisting in screening and data extraction. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a random-effects model computed the pooled relative risk (RR) using R software, version 4.3. The review included six studies varying significantly in design, sample sizes, and deprivation assessment methods. The meta-analysis combined data from five studies totaling 15 827 participants from the least deprived and 18 147 from the most deprived neighborhoods, yielding an RR of 0.909 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.566, 1.461], <i>P</i> = .607), indicating a non-significant lower risk of GDM in more deprived groups. A substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 70%) was observed, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. This analysis suggests that living in a deprived neighborhood does not significantly alter GDM risk, underscoring the necessity for further research to refine public health strategies and interventions. The variability in neighborhood deprivation definitions and potential unaccounted confounding factors highlight the need for comprehensive studies, especially from low-income and middle-income countries, to elucidate the intricate links between socioeconomic factors and GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10105395241305671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241305671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241305671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一个主要的全球健康问题,影响孕产妇和儿童健康。虽然遗传倾向和个人病史是公认的风险因素,但新兴研究表明,邻里社会经济特征等外部因素也会产生重大影响。本研究系统回顾和荟萃分析了邻里剥夺与GDM发病率之间的关系。截至2024年1月10日,我们检索了多个数据库,寻找邻里剥夺与GDM之间的关系。根据预定义的标准选择符合条件的研究,并使用嵌套知识软件协助筛选和数据提取。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,随机效应模型使用R软件4.3版计算综合相对风险(RR)。该综述包括6项在设计、样本量和剥夺评估方法上有显著差异的研究。荟萃分析结合了5项研究的数据,共15 827名来自最贫困社区的参与者和18 147名来自最贫困社区的参与者,RR为0.909(95%可信区间[CI] = [0.566, 1.461], P = 0.607),表明较贫困群体的GDM风险不显著降低。观察到大量异质性(I2 = 70%),敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。这一分析表明,生活在贫困社区并没有显著改变GDM的风险,强调了进一步研究以完善公共卫生策略和干预措施的必要性。邻里剥夺定义的可变性和潜在的未解释的混杂因素突出表明,需要进行全面的研究,特别是来自低收入和中等收入国家的研究,以阐明社会经济因素与GDM之间的复杂联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Neighborhood Deprivation and Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major global health concern, affecting maternal and child health. Although genetic predispositions and individual medical histories are well-recognized risk factors, emerging research suggests a significant impact of external factors like neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the association between neighborhood deprivation and GDM incidence. We searched multiple databases up to January 10, 2024, for studies linking neighborhood deprivation with GDM. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined criteria, with the Nested Knowledge software assisting in screening and data extraction. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a random-effects model computed the pooled relative risk (RR) using R software, version 4.3. The review included six studies varying significantly in design, sample sizes, and deprivation assessment methods. The meta-analysis combined data from five studies totaling 15 827 participants from the least deprived and 18 147 from the most deprived neighborhoods, yielding an RR of 0.909 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.566, 1.461], P = .607), indicating a non-significant lower risk of GDM in more deprived groups. A substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 70%) was observed, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. This analysis suggests that living in a deprived neighborhood does not significantly alter GDM risk, underscoring the necessity for further research to refine public health strategies and interventions. The variability in neighborhood deprivation definitions and potential unaccounted confounding factors highlight the need for comprehensive studies, especially from low-income and middle-income countries, to elucidate the intricate links between socioeconomic factors and GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health (APJPH) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that focuses on health issues in the Asia-Pacific Region. APJPH publishes original articles on public health related issues, including implications for practical applications to professional education and services for public health and primary health care that are of concern and relevance to the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of Cancer in the Fiji Islands: 2010 to 2018. Assessment of Commercial Baby Food Quality and Promotion in Malaysia for Policy Development. Association Between the Community Gatherings Places and the Kihon Checklist Score: JAGES Longitudinal Study. Child Amputees in Gaza: A Humanitarian Crisis Demanding Action. Association Between Body Mass Index and Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in University Students From Seven Regions of China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1