学习型卫生系统对青少年法律和社区精神卫生系统间跨系统协作的影响:II型混合有效性-实施试验

Lauren O'Reilly, Dayu Sun, Katherine Schwartz, Logan Gillenwater, Allyson Dir, Patrick Monahan, Gregory A Aarons, Lisa Saldana, Zachary Adams, Tamika Zapolski, Leslie Hulvershorn, Matthew C Aalsma
{"title":"学习型卫生系统对青少年法律和社区精神卫生系统间跨系统协作的影响:II型混合有效性-实施试验","authors":"Lauren O'Reilly, Dayu Sun, Katherine Schwartz, Logan Gillenwater, Allyson Dir, Patrick Monahan, Gregory A Aarons, Lisa Saldana, Zachary Adams, Tamika Zapolski, Leslie Hulvershorn, Matthew C Aalsma","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00686-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth involved in the legal system have disproportionately higher rates of problematic substance use than non-involved youth. Identifying and connecting legal-involved youth to substance use intervention is critical and relies on the connection between legal and behavioral health agencies, which may be facilitated by learning health systems (LHS). We analyzed the impact of an LHS intervention on youth legal and behavioral health personnel ratings of their cross-system collaboration. We also examined organizational climate toward evidence-based practice (EBP) over and above the LHS intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from a type II hybrid effectiveness trial implementing an LHS intervention with youth legal and community mental health centers (CMHCs) in eight Indiana counties. Using a stepped wedge design, counties were randomly assigned to one of three cohorts and stepped in at nine-month intervals. Counties were in the treatment phase for 18 months, after which they were in the maintenance phase. Youth legal system and CMHC personnel completed five waves of data collection (n=307 total respondents, ranging from 108-178 per wave). Cross-system collaboration was measured via the Cultural Exchange Inventory, organizational EBP climate via the Implementation Climate Scale and Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale, and intervention via a dummy-coded indicator variable. We conducted linear mixed models to examine: 1) the treatment indicator, and 2) the treatment indicator and organizational EBP climate variables on cross-system collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment indicator was not significantly associated with cross-system collaboration. When including the organizational EBP climate variables, the treatment indicator significantly predicted cross-system collaboration. Compared to the control phase, treatment (B=0.41, standard error [SE]=0.20) and maintenance (B=0.60, SE=0.29) phases were associated with greater cross-system collaboration output.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis may have been underpowered to detect an effect; third variables may have explained variance in cross-system collaboration, and, thus, the inclusion of important covariates may have reduced residual errors and increased the estimation precision. The LHS intervention may have affected cross-system collaboration perception and offers a promising avenue of research to determine how systems work together to improve legal-involved-youth substance use outcomes. Future research is needed to replicate results among a larger sample and examine youth-level outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04499079. Registered 30 July 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04499079 .</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of learning health systems on cross-system collaboration between youth legal and community mental health systems: a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren O'Reilly, Dayu Sun, Katherine Schwartz, Logan Gillenwater, Allyson Dir, Patrick Monahan, Gregory A Aarons, Lisa Saldana, Zachary Adams, Tamika Zapolski, Leslie Hulvershorn, Matthew C Aalsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-024-00686-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth involved in the legal system have disproportionately higher rates of problematic substance use than non-involved youth. Identifying and connecting legal-involved youth to substance use intervention is critical and relies on the connection between legal and behavioral health agencies, which may be facilitated by learning health systems (LHS). We analyzed the impact of an LHS intervention on youth legal and behavioral health personnel ratings of their cross-system collaboration. We also examined organizational climate toward evidence-based practice (EBP) over and above the LHS intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from a type II hybrid effectiveness trial implementing an LHS intervention with youth legal and community mental health centers (CMHCs) in eight Indiana counties. Using a stepped wedge design, counties were randomly assigned to one of three cohorts and stepped in at nine-month intervals. Counties were in the treatment phase for 18 months, after which they were in the maintenance phase. Youth legal system and CMHC personnel completed five waves of data collection (n=307 total respondents, ranging from 108-178 per wave). Cross-system collaboration was measured via the Cultural Exchange Inventory, organizational EBP climate via the Implementation Climate Scale and Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale, and intervention via a dummy-coded indicator variable. We conducted linear mixed models to examine: 1) the treatment indicator, and 2) the treatment indicator and organizational EBP climate variables on cross-system collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment indicator was not significantly associated with cross-system collaboration. When including the organizational EBP climate variables, the treatment indicator significantly predicted cross-system collaboration. Compared to the control phase, treatment (B=0.41, standard error [SE]=0.20) and maintenance (B=0.60, SE=0.29) phases were associated with greater cross-system collaboration output.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis may have been underpowered to detect an effect; third variables may have explained variance in cross-system collaboration, and, thus, the inclusion of important covariates may have reduced residual errors and increased the estimation precision. The LHS intervention may have affected cross-system collaboration perception and offers a promising avenue of research to determine how systems work together to improve legal-involved-youth substance use outcomes. Future research is needed to replicate results among a larger sample and examine youth-level outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04499079. Registered 30 July 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04499079 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00686-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00686-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:参与法律体系的青少年比没有参与的青少年有不成比例的高问题物质使用率。识别涉事青少年并将其与药物使用干预联系起来至关重要,这依赖于法律和行为健康机构之间的联系,这可以通过学习健康系统(LHS)来促进。我们分析了LHS干预对青少年法律和行为健康人员跨系统合作评分的影响。我们还检查了LHS干预之外的循证实践(EBP)的组织氛围。方法:数据来源于印第安纳州8个县的青少年法律和社区精神卫生中心(CMHCs)实施LHS干预的II型混合效果试验。采用阶梯式楔形设计,各县被随机分配到三个队列中的一个,每隔9个月介入一次。各县处于18个月的治疗阶段,之后进入维护阶段。青少年法律系统和CMHC工作人员完成了五波数据收集(n=307名调查对象,每波108-178名)。通过文化交流量表测量跨系统协作,通过实施气候量表和实施公民行为量表测量组织EBP氛围,通过虚拟编码指标变量测量干预。本文采用线性混合模型考察了处理指标和组织EBP气候变量对跨系统协作的影响。结果:治疗指标与跨系统协作无显著相关。当包含组织EBP气候变量时,处理指标显著预测跨系统协作。与控制阶段相比,处理阶段(B=0.41,标准误差[SE]=0.20)和维护阶段(B=0.60, SE=0.29)与更大的跨系统协作输出相关。结论:该分析可能不足以检测影响;第三个变量可能解释了跨系统协作中的方差,因此,包含重要的协变量可能减少了残差并提高了估计精度。LHS的干预可能影响了跨系统协作的感知,并提供了一个有前途的研究途径,以确定系统如何协同工作,以改善涉及法律的青少年物质使用结果。未来的研究需要在更大的样本中复制结果,并检查青年水平的结果。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov识别码:NCT04499079。注册于2020年7月30日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04499079。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of learning health systems on cross-system collaboration between youth legal and community mental health systems: a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Background: Youth involved in the legal system have disproportionately higher rates of problematic substance use than non-involved youth. Identifying and connecting legal-involved youth to substance use intervention is critical and relies on the connection between legal and behavioral health agencies, which may be facilitated by learning health systems (LHS). We analyzed the impact of an LHS intervention on youth legal and behavioral health personnel ratings of their cross-system collaboration. We also examined organizational climate toward evidence-based practice (EBP) over and above the LHS intervention.

Methods: Data were derived from a type II hybrid effectiveness trial implementing an LHS intervention with youth legal and community mental health centers (CMHCs) in eight Indiana counties. Using a stepped wedge design, counties were randomly assigned to one of three cohorts and stepped in at nine-month intervals. Counties were in the treatment phase for 18 months, after which they were in the maintenance phase. Youth legal system and CMHC personnel completed five waves of data collection (n=307 total respondents, ranging from 108-178 per wave). Cross-system collaboration was measured via the Cultural Exchange Inventory, organizational EBP climate via the Implementation Climate Scale and Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale, and intervention via a dummy-coded indicator variable. We conducted linear mixed models to examine: 1) the treatment indicator, and 2) the treatment indicator and organizational EBP climate variables on cross-system collaboration.

Results: The treatment indicator was not significantly associated with cross-system collaboration. When including the organizational EBP climate variables, the treatment indicator significantly predicted cross-system collaboration. Compared to the control phase, treatment (B=0.41, standard error [SE]=0.20) and maintenance (B=0.60, SE=0.29) phases were associated with greater cross-system collaboration output.

Conclusions: The analysis may have been underpowered to detect an effect; third variables may have explained variance in cross-system collaboration, and, thus, the inclusion of important covariates may have reduced residual errors and increased the estimation precision. The LHS intervention may have affected cross-system collaboration perception and offers a promising avenue of research to determine how systems work together to improve legal-involved-youth substance use outcomes. Future research is needed to replicate results among a larger sample and examine youth-level outcomes.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04499079. Registered 30 July 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04499079 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing evidence-based cardiovascular disease prevention programming in rural African American communities: a community-engaged concept mapping study. Designing an intervention to improve cognitive evaluations in primary care. Use of implementation logic models in the Quadruple Aim QUERI: conceptualization and evolution. Scaling up of parenting support to prevent violence against children in Tanzania: insights from policymakers and service providers. Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of a patient safety bundle for pregnancy-related severe hypertension in 3 North Carolina outpatient clinics: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1