Narat Srivali, Federica De Giacomi, Teng Moua, Jay H Ryu
{"title":"皮质类固醇治疗间质性肺疾病急性加重:系统综述","authors":"Narat Srivali, Federica De Giacomi, Teng Moua, Jay H Ryu","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) often results in death and poses significant challenges in clinical management. While corticosteroids are frequently employed, the optimal regimen and their clinical efficacy remain uncertain. To address this knowledge gap, we undertook a systematic review to evaluate the impact of steroid therapy on clinical outcomes in patients experiencing AE-ILD. Method Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, identifying 12 454 articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 447 articles were selected for full-text review. Ultimately, nine studies met inclusion criteria, comparing high-dose corticosteroids with low-dose or non-steroidal interventions in treating AE-ILD. Key outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality, as well as AE recurrence. Results Analysis of nine studies (total n=18 509) revealed differential treatment effects based on the ILD subtype. In non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ILD, high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>1.0 mg/kg prednisolone) demonstrated improved survival (adjusted HR 0.221, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.480, p<0.001) and reduced 90-day mortality. Early tapering of high-dose corticosteroids (>10% reduction within 2 weeks) reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99). Higher cumulative doses in the first 30 days (5185±2414 mg/month vs 3133±1990 mg/month) were associated with lower recurrence rates (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.90, p=0.02). In IPF patients, however, high-dose therapy showed inconsistent benefits, with some studies reporting increased mortality risk (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.107, p<0.001). Conclusion This review emphasises the potential benefits of individualised treatment approaches for AE-ILD but highlights the need for caution in making definitive recommendations. Although high-dose corticosteroids may show promise, particularly in non-IPF cases, the current evidence is inconsistent, and the lack of robust supporting literature makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further research through randomised controlled trials is necessary to refine and optimise therapeutic strategies for AE-ILD. Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticosteroid therapy for treating acute exacerbation of interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Narat Srivali, Federica De Giacomi, Teng Moua, Jay H Ryu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2024-222636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) often results in death and poses significant challenges in clinical management. While corticosteroids are frequently employed, the optimal regimen and their clinical efficacy remain uncertain. To address this knowledge gap, we undertook a systematic review to evaluate the impact of steroid therapy on clinical outcomes in patients experiencing AE-ILD. Method Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, identifying 12 454 articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 447 articles were selected for full-text review. Ultimately, nine studies met inclusion criteria, comparing high-dose corticosteroids with low-dose or non-steroidal interventions in treating AE-ILD. Key outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality, as well as AE recurrence. Results Analysis of nine studies (total n=18 509) revealed differential treatment effects based on the ILD subtype. In non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ILD, high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>1.0 mg/kg prednisolone) demonstrated improved survival (adjusted HR 0.221, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.480, p<0.001) and reduced 90-day mortality. Early tapering of high-dose corticosteroids (>10% reduction within 2 weeks) reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99). Higher cumulative doses in the first 30 days (5185±2414 mg/month vs 3133±1990 mg/month) were associated with lower recurrence rates (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.90, p=0.02). In IPF patients, however, high-dose therapy showed inconsistent benefits, with some studies reporting increased mortality risk (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.107, p<0.001). Conclusion This review emphasises the potential benefits of individualised treatment approaches for AE-ILD but highlights the need for caution in making definitive recommendations. Although high-dose corticosteroids may show promise, particularly in non-IPF cases, the current evidence is inconsistent, and the lack of robust supporting literature makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further research through randomised controlled trials is necessary to refine and optimise therapeutic strategies for AE-ILD. Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thorax\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222636\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肺间质性疾病(AE-ILD)急性加重常导致死亡,给临床治疗带来重大挑战。虽然经常使用皮质类固醇,但最佳方案及其临床疗效仍不确定。为了解决这一知识差距,我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估类固醇治疗对AE-ILD患者临床结果的影响。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们系统地检索了多个数据库,确定了12454篇文章。在剔除重复、筛选标题和摘要后,我们选择了447篇文章进行全文审查。最终,9项研究符合纳入标准,比较了高剂量皮质类固醇与低剂量或非类固醇干预治疗AE-ILD的效果。主要结局包括住院和长期死亡率,以及AE复发。结果9项研究(总n= 18509)的分析揭示了基于ILD亚型的不同治疗效果。在非特发性肺纤维化(IPF) ILD中,高剂量皮质类固醇治疗(bbb1.0 mg/kg泼尼松龙)可改善生存率(调整后危险度0.221,95% CI 0.102至0.480,2周内降低10%)降低住院死亡率(调整后危险度0.37,95% CI 0.14至0.99)。前30天较高的累积剂量(5185±2414 mg/月vs 3133±1990 mg/月)与较低的复发率相关(调整后危险度0.61,95% CI 0.41 ~ 0.90, p=0.02)。然而,在IPF患者中,高剂量治疗显示出不一致的益处,一些研究报告死亡风险增加(OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044至1.107,p<0.001)。结论:本综述强调了AE-ILD个体化治疗方法的潜在益处,但也强调了在提出明确建议时需要谨慎。尽管大剂量皮质类固醇可能显示出希望,特别是在非ipf病例中,但目前的证据并不一致,而且缺乏有力的支持文献,因此很难得出确切的结论。有必要通过随机对照试验进行进一步研究,以完善和优化AE-ILD的治疗策略。数据共享不适用,因为没有为本研究生成和/或分析数据集。
Corticosteroid therapy for treating acute exacerbation of interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review
Introduction Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) often results in death and poses significant challenges in clinical management. While corticosteroids are frequently employed, the optimal regimen and their clinical efficacy remain uncertain. To address this knowledge gap, we undertook a systematic review to evaluate the impact of steroid therapy on clinical outcomes in patients experiencing AE-ILD. Method Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, identifying 12 454 articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 447 articles were selected for full-text review. Ultimately, nine studies met inclusion criteria, comparing high-dose corticosteroids with low-dose or non-steroidal interventions in treating AE-ILD. Key outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality, as well as AE recurrence. Results Analysis of nine studies (total n=18 509) revealed differential treatment effects based on the ILD subtype. In non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ILD, high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>1.0 mg/kg prednisolone) demonstrated improved survival (adjusted HR 0.221, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.480, p<0.001) and reduced 90-day mortality. Early tapering of high-dose corticosteroids (>10% reduction within 2 weeks) reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99). Higher cumulative doses in the first 30 days (5185±2414 mg/month vs 3133±1990 mg/month) were associated with lower recurrence rates (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.90, p=0.02). In IPF patients, however, high-dose therapy showed inconsistent benefits, with some studies reporting increased mortality risk (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.107, p<0.001). Conclusion This review emphasises the potential benefits of individualised treatment approaches for AE-ILD but highlights the need for caution in making definitive recommendations. Although high-dose corticosteroids may show promise, particularly in non-IPF cases, the current evidence is inconsistent, and the lack of robust supporting literature makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further research through randomised controlled trials is necessary to refine and optimise therapeutic strategies for AE-ILD. Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.