点亮那个机器人!针对Android恶意软件检测中应用混淆的静态分析特性有效性研究

IF 7.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of Network and Computer Applications Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104094
Borja Molina-Coronado, Antonio Ruggia, Usue Mori, Alessio Merlo, Alexander Mendiburu, Jose Miguel-Alonso
{"title":"点亮那个机器人!针对Android恶意软件检测中应用混淆的静态分析特性有效性研究","authors":"Borja Molina-Coronado, Antonio Ruggia, Usue Mori, Alessio Merlo, Alexander Mendiburu, Jose Miguel-Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malware authors have seen obfuscation as the mean to bypass malware detectors based on static analysis features. For Android, several studies have confirmed that many anti-malware products are easily evaded with simple program transformations. As opposed to these works, ML detection proposals for Android leveraging static analysis features have also been proposed as obfuscation-resilient. Therefore, it needs to be determined to what extent the use of a specific obfuscation strategy or tool poses a risk for the validity of ML Android malware detectors based on static analysis features. To shed some light in this regard, in this article we assess the impact of specific obfuscation techniques on common features extracted using static analysis and determine whether the changes are significant enough to undermine the effectiveness of ML malware detectors that rely on these features. The experimental results suggest that obfuscation techniques affect all static analysis features to varying degrees across different tools. However, certain features retain their validity for ML malware detection even in the presence of obfuscation. Based on these findings, we propose a ML malware detector for Android that is robust against obfuscation and outperforms current state-of-the-art detectors.","PeriodicalId":54784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Network and Computer Applications","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Light up that Droid! On the effectiveness of static analysis features against app obfuscation for Android malware detection\",\"authors\":\"Borja Molina-Coronado, Antonio Ruggia, Usue Mori, Alessio Merlo, Alexander Mendiburu, Jose Miguel-Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Malware authors have seen obfuscation as the mean to bypass malware detectors based on static analysis features. For Android, several studies have confirmed that many anti-malware products are easily evaded with simple program transformations. As opposed to these works, ML detection proposals for Android leveraging static analysis features have also been proposed as obfuscation-resilient. Therefore, it needs to be determined to what extent the use of a specific obfuscation strategy or tool poses a risk for the validity of ML Android malware detectors based on static analysis features. To shed some light in this regard, in this article we assess the impact of specific obfuscation techniques on common features extracted using static analysis and determine whether the changes are significant enough to undermine the effectiveness of ML malware detectors that rely on these features. The experimental results suggest that obfuscation techniques affect all static analysis features to varying degrees across different tools. However, certain features retain their validity for ML malware detection even in the presence of obfuscation. Based on these findings, we propose a ML malware detector for Android that is robust against obfuscation and outperforms current state-of-the-art detectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Network and Computer Applications\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Network and Computer Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Network and Computer Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶意软件作者将混淆视为绕过基于静态分析功能的恶意软件检测器的手段。对于Android,一些研究已经证实,许多反恶意软件产品很容易通过简单的程序转换来规避。与这些工作相反,利用静态分析特性的Android机器学习检测建议也被提议为具有混淆弹性。因此,需要确定特定混淆策略或工具的使用在多大程度上对基于静态分析功能的ML Android恶意软件检测器的有效性构成风险。为了阐明这一点,在本文中,我们评估了特定混淆技术对使用静态分析提取的常见特征的影响,并确定这些变化是否足以破坏依赖于这些特征的ML恶意软件检测器的有效性。实验结果表明,混淆技术在不同的工具中对所有静态分析特征的影响程度不同。然而,即使在存在混淆的情况下,某些功能仍然可以有效地检测ML恶意软件。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种针对Android的机器学习恶意软件检测器,它具有抗混淆的鲁棒性,并且优于当前最先进的检测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Light up that Droid! On the effectiveness of static analysis features against app obfuscation for Android malware detection
Malware authors have seen obfuscation as the mean to bypass malware detectors based on static analysis features. For Android, several studies have confirmed that many anti-malware products are easily evaded with simple program transformations. As opposed to these works, ML detection proposals for Android leveraging static analysis features have also been proposed as obfuscation-resilient. Therefore, it needs to be determined to what extent the use of a specific obfuscation strategy or tool poses a risk for the validity of ML Android malware detectors based on static analysis features. To shed some light in this regard, in this article we assess the impact of specific obfuscation techniques on common features extracted using static analysis and determine whether the changes are significant enough to undermine the effectiveness of ML malware detectors that rely on these features. The experimental results suggest that obfuscation techniques affect all static analysis features to varying degrees across different tools. However, certain features retain their validity for ML malware detection even in the presence of obfuscation. Based on these findings, we propose a ML malware detector for Android that is robust against obfuscation and outperforms current state-of-the-art detectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Journal of Network and Computer Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
142
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Network and Computer Applications welcomes research contributions, surveys, and notes in all areas relating to computer networks and applications thereof. Sample topics include new design techniques, interesting or novel applications, components or standards; computer networks with tools such as WWW; emerging standards for internet protocols; Wireless networks; Mobile Computing; emerging computing models such as cloud computing, grid computing; applications of networked systems for remote collaboration and telemedicine, etc. The journal is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, Engineering Index, Web of Science, Science Citation Index Expanded and INSPEC.
期刊最新文献
ALB-TP: Adaptive Load Balancing based on Traffic Prediction using GRU-Attention for Software-Defined DCNs On and off the manifold: Generation and Detection of adversarial attacks in IIoT networks Light up that Droid! On the effectiveness of static analysis features against app obfuscation for Android malware detection Clusters in chaos: A deep unsupervised learning paradigm for network anomaly detection Consensus hybrid ensemble machine learning for intrusion detection with explainable AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1