推还是拉?基于动态演化博弈方法的整车厂碳减排策略研究

IF 13.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108137
Chuan Zhao , Yutong Yin , Kun Wang , Xuying Ma
{"title":"推还是拉?基于动态演化博弈方法的整车厂碳减排策略研究","authors":"Chuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yutong Yin ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Xuying Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), serving as the paramount constituents of the manufacturing industry, have emerged as the focus of global economic competition. However, due to their cross-border operations associated with high carbon emissions, the OEMs' carbon reducing is constrained by both their foreign clients and local governments. This study utilizes a tripartite evolutionary game model to examine the complex interactions among OEMs, foreign clients, and the local government regarding the carbon pricing, technology sharing and the accountability mechanism. Evolution process, stability (instability) points, dynamic government policies, as well as carbon trading in different scenarios are also studied. The results show that precise government penalties push OEMs to actively reduce carbon emissions. Insufficient assistance or incentives will pull OEMs towards a negative carbon reduction. The push effect of foreign clients' assistance on OEMs carbon reducing surpasses that of the local government incentives when the carbon price rises. The technology sharing and accountability mechanism present a bidirectional effect that enables both OEMs and foreign clients achieve a win-win outcome in carbon reduction. This study examines the economic trade-off of carbon reduction in the OEM industry, especially under the push-pull pressures exerted by local government and foreign clients from both static and dynamic evolutionary perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108137"},"PeriodicalIF":13.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Push or pull? Identifying the OEMs' carbon reduction strategies based on the dynamic evolutionary game approach\",\"authors\":\"Chuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yutong Yin ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Xuying Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), serving as the paramount constituents of the manufacturing industry, have emerged as the focus of global economic competition. However, due to their cross-border operations associated with high carbon emissions, the OEMs' carbon reducing is constrained by both their foreign clients and local governments. This study utilizes a tripartite evolutionary game model to examine the complex interactions among OEMs, foreign clients, and the local government regarding the carbon pricing, technology sharing and the accountability mechanism. Evolution process, stability (instability) points, dynamic government policies, as well as carbon trading in different scenarios are also studied. The results show that precise government penalties push OEMs to actively reduce carbon emissions. Insufficient assistance or incentives will pull OEMs towards a negative carbon reduction. The push effect of foreign clients' assistance on OEMs carbon reducing surpasses that of the local government incentives when the carbon price rises. The technology sharing and accountability mechanism present a bidirectional effect that enables both OEMs and foreign clients achieve a win-win outcome in carbon reduction. This study examines the economic trade-off of carbon reduction in the OEM industry, especially under the push-pull pressures exerted by local government and foreign clients from both static and dynamic evolutionary perspectives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008466\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原始设备制造商(oem)作为制造业的重要组成部分,已经成为全球经济竞争的焦点。然而,由于整车企业的跨境经营与高碳排放相关,其碳减排受到了国外客户和当地政府的双重制约。本文运用三方演化博弈模型,考察了oem、国外客户和地方政府在碳定价、技术共享和问责机制等方面的复杂互动关系。本文还研究了不同情景下碳交易的演化过程、稳定(不稳定)点、政府动态政策以及碳交易。结果表明,精准的政府处罚措施将推动整车厂积极减少碳排放。援助或激励措施的不足将使原始设备制造商走向负碳减排。当碳价上升时,国外客户援助对整车厂碳减排的推动作用超过了地方政府激励的推动作用。技术共享和问责机制呈现双向效应,使oem和国外客户在碳减排方面实现双赢。本文从静态和动态演化的角度考察了OEM行业碳减排的经济权衡,特别是在地方政府和外国客户施加推拉压力的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Push or pull? Identifying the OEMs' carbon reduction strategies based on the dynamic evolutionary game approach
The Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), serving as the paramount constituents of the manufacturing industry, have emerged as the focus of global economic competition. However, due to their cross-border operations associated with high carbon emissions, the OEMs' carbon reducing is constrained by both their foreign clients and local governments. This study utilizes a tripartite evolutionary game model to examine the complex interactions among OEMs, foreign clients, and the local government regarding the carbon pricing, technology sharing and the accountability mechanism. Evolution process, stability (instability) points, dynamic government policies, as well as carbon trading in different scenarios are also studied. The results show that precise government penalties push OEMs to actively reduce carbon emissions. Insufficient assistance or incentives will pull OEMs towards a negative carbon reduction. The push effect of foreign clients' assistance on OEMs carbon reducing surpasses that of the local government incentives when the carbon price rises. The technology sharing and accountability mechanism present a bidirectional effect that enables both OEMs and foreign clients achieve a win-win outcome in carbon reduction. This study examines the economic trade-off of carbon reduction in the OEM industry, especially under the push-pull pressures exerted by local government and foreign clients from both static and dynamic evolutionary perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Commonality in systemic risk from green and conventional energy The role of managerial risk preferences on effectiveness of wind subsidies Energy markets reforms and renewable energy in Africa: Do public–private partnership matter? The effect of pricing instruments on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Australia Carbon neutrality through industry 4.0: A decision-making approach for sustainable energy efficient logistics operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1