异质性血压治疗对2型糖尿病认知能力下降的影响:一项随机临床试验的机器学习分析

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/dom.16145
Xuan Zhao, Xiaoli Xu, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Ruizhi Zheng, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Mian Li, Jie Zheng, Min Xu, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu
{"title":"异质性血压治疗对2型糖尿病认知能力下降的影响:一项随机临床试验的机器学习分析","authors":"Xuan Zhao, Xiaoli Xu, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Ruizhi Zheng, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Mian Li, Jie Zheng, Min Xu, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu","doi":"10.1111/dom.16145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients with diabetes who can derive cognitive benefits from intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment using machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) study, 1349 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent BP treatment (intensive treatment targeting a systolic BP <120 mmHg vs. standard treatment targeting <140 mmHg) were included in the machine learning analysis. Seventy-nine variables correlated with diabetes and cognitive function were used to build the causal forest and causal tree models for identifying heterogeneous BP treatment effects on cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses identified four variables including urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR, mg/g), Framingham 10-year cardiovascular risk score (FRS, %), triglycerides (TG, mmol/L) and diabetes duration, that categorized the participants into five subgroups with different risk benefits for cognitive decline from BP treatments. Subgroup 1 (UACR ≥65 mg/g) had an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 15.36% (95% CI, 5.01%-25.46%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73). Subgroup 2 (UACR <65 mg/g, FRS ≥26%, TG <2.3 mmol/L and diabetes duration ≥9 years) had an ARR of 14.74% (95% CI, 4.56%-24.59%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77). No significant benefits were found for other subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes with high UACR, or with low UACR and low TG, but high predicted cardiovascular risk and long diabetes duration were likely to derive cognitive benefits from intensive BP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous blood pressure treatment effects on cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes: A machine learning analysis of a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Zhao, Xiaoli Xu, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Ruizhi Zheng, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Mian Li, Jie Zheng, Min Xu, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients with diabetes who can derive cognitive benefits from intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment using machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) study, 1349 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent BP treatment (intensive treatment targeting a systolic BP <120 mmHg vs. standard treatment targeting <140 mmHg) were included in the machine learning analysis. Seventy-nine variables correlated with diabetes and cognitive function were used to build the causal forest and causal tree models for identifying heterogeneous BP treatment effects on cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses identified four variables including urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR, mg/g), Framingham 10-year cardiovascular risk score (FRS, %), triglycerides (TG, mmol/L) and diabetes duration, that categorized the participants into five subgroups with different risk benefits for cognitive decline from BP treatments. Subgroup 1 (UACR ≥65 mg/g) had an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 15.36% (95% CI, 5.01%-25.46%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73). Subgroup 2 (UACR <65 mg/g, FRS ≥26%, TG <2.3 mmol/L and diabetes duration ≥9 years) had an ARR of 14.74% (95% CI, 4.56%-24.59%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77). No significant benefits were found for other subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes with high UACR, or with low UACR and low TG, but high predicted cardiovascular risk and long diabetes duration were likely to derive cognitive benefits from intensive BP treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在确定糖尿病患者的特征,这些患者可以从使用机器学习方法的强化血压(BP)治疗中获得认知益处。材料和方法:使用来自“控制糖尿病心血管风险的行动”(Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, ACCORD-MIND)研究的数据,1349例2型糖尿病患者接受了血压治疗(针对收缩压的强化治疗)。我们的分析确定了四个变量,包括尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR, mg/g)、Framingham 10年心血管风险评分(FRS, %)、甘油三酯(TG, mmol/L)和糖尿病持续时间,这些变量将参与者分为5个亚组,它们对BP治疗导致的认知能力下降具有不同的风险益处。亚组1 (UACR≥65 mg/g)与标准降压治疗相比,强化降压治疗的绝对风险降低(ARR)为15.36% (95% CI, 5.01%-25.46%)(风险比[HR], 0.36;95% ci, 0.18-0.73)。结论:具有高UACR,或低UACR和低TG,但预测心血管风险高且糖尿病持续时间长的2型糖尿病患者可能从强化BP治疗中获得认知益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneous blood pressure treatment effects on cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes: A machine learning analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Aim: We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients with diabetes who can derive cognitive benefits from intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment using machine learning methods.

Materials and methods: Using data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) study, 1349 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent BP treatment (intensive treatment targeting a systolic BP <120 mmHg vs. standard treatment targeting <140 mmHg) were included in the machine learning analysis. Seventy-nine variables correlated with diabetes and cognitive function were used to build the causal forest and causal tree models for identifying heterogeneous BP treatment effects on cognitive decline.

Results: Our analyses identified four variables including urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR, mg/g), Framingham 10-year cardiovascular risk score (FRS, %), triglycerides (TG, mmol/L) and diabetes duration, that categorized the participants into five subgroups with different risk benefits for cognitive decline from BP treatments. Subgroup 1 (UACR ≥65 mg/g) had an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 15.36% (95% CI, 5.01%-25.46%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73). Subgroup 2 (UACR <65 mg/g, FRS ≥26%, TG <2.3 mmol/L and diabetes duration ≥9 years) had an ARR of 14.74% (95% CI, 4.56%-24.59%) from intensive versus standard BP treatment (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77). No significant benefits were found for other subgroups.

Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes with high UACR, or with low UACR and low TG, but high predicted cardiovascular risk and long diabetes duration were likely to derive cognitive benefits from intensive BP treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events and risk factors: A review and network meta-analysis. Effectiveness of gemigliptin on risk of major adverse kidney events in people with type 2 diabetes: A Korean cohort study. Efficacy of high-intensity interval training in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. How to compare algorithms for automated insulin delivery using different sensors? Identification of growth differentiation factor 15 as an early predictive biomarker for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A nested case-control study of UK Biobank proteomic data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1