血液学指标作为类风湿关节炎预后工具的评价。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY BMC Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1186/s41927-024-00444-0
Maryam Masoumi, Maryam Bozorgi, Zahra Nourmohammadi, Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Aref Shariati, Jafar Karami
{"title":"血液学指标作为类风湿关节炎预后工具的评价。","authors":"Maryam Masoumi, Maryam Bozorgi, Zahra Nourmohammadi, Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Aref Shariati, Jafar Karami","doi":"10.1186/s41927-024-00444-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing inflammation is central to the management of RA. However, commonly used markers such as CRP and ESR, along with the DAS-28 score, have shown limitations. Hematologic indices, such as platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), show potential as reliable indicators of inflammation in RA. This study evaluates these markers across different RA activity levels to identify effective biomarkers for distinguishing active RA from remission.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>305 RA patients were enrolled in our study, diagnosed by ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria, and divided into four groups according to the DAS28-ESR score. 8 ml of blood were taken for a CBC test and serological tests such as rheumatoid factor (RF), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed as potential markers of inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of RA patients was 51.7 years and a disease duration of 56.7 months. Significant differences in tender and swollen joints were observed between RA groups. Laboratory findings revealed higher CRP and ESR in active RA patients, while hemoglobin, hematocrit, and lymphocyte counts were higher in remission group. ROC analysis showed ESR, CRP, NLR, and PLR as potential markers for distinguishing active from remission RA, with ESR demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy. LMR could not differentiate between active and inactive forms of RA disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NLR and PLR markers were significantly correlated with traditional inflammatory markers like CRP and ESR. These novel markers could be useful tools for evaluating RA activity, offering a cost-effective alternative to imaging techniques. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"8 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of hematological markers as prognostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Masoumi, Maryam Bozorgi, Zahra Nourmohammadi, Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Aref Shariati, Jafar Karami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41927-024-00444-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing inflammation is central to the management of RA. However, commonly used markers such as CRP and ESR, along with the DAS-28 score, have shown limitations. Hematologic indices, such as platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), show potential as reliable indicators of inflammation in RA. This study evaluates these markers across different RA activity levels to identify effective biomarkers for distinguishing active RA from remission.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>305 RA patients were enrolled in our study, diagnosed by ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria, and divided into four groups according to the DAS28-ESR score. 8 ml of blood were taken for a CBC test and serological tests such as rheumatoid factor (RF), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed as potential markers of inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of RA patients was 51.7 years and a disease duration of 56.7 months. Significant differences in tender and swollen joints were observed between RA groups. Laboratory findings revealed higher CRP and ESR in active RA patients, while hemoglobin, hematocrit, and lymphocyte counts were higher in remission group. ROC analysis showed ESR, CRP, NLR, and PLR as potential markers for distinguishing active from remission RA, with ESR demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy. LMR could not differentiate between active and inactive forms of RA disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NLR and PLR markers were significantly correlated with traditional inflammatory markers like CRP and ESR. These novel markers could be useful tools for evaluating RA activity, offering a cost-effective alternative to imaging techniques. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00444-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00444-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减轻炎症是治疗类风湿性关节炎的核心。然而,常用的标志物,如CRP和ESR,以及DAS-28评分,已经显示出局限性。血液学指标,如血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR)和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR),显示出作为RA炎症可靠指标的潜力。本研究评估了不同RA活动水平的这些标记物,以确定区分活动期RA和缓解期RA的有效生物标志物。材料和方法:我们的研究纳入305例RA患者,按照ACR/EULAR 2010标准诊断,根据DAS28-ESR评分分为四组。取血8ml进行CBC检测和血清学检测,如类风湿因子(RF)、抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(anti-CCP)、抗核抗体(ANA)、c反应蛋白(CRP)。将血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR)和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)作为炎症的潜在标志物进行评估。结果:RA患者平均年龄51.7岁,病程56.7个月。类风湿关节炎组间关节压痛和肿胀有显著差异。实验室结果显示活动期RA患者的CRP和ESR较高,而缓解组的血红蛋白、红细胞压积和淋巴细胞计数较高。ROC分析显示ESR、CRP、NLR和PLR是区分活动性RA和缓解性RA的潜在标志物,其中ESR的诊断准确性最高。LMR不能区分活动性和非活动性RA疾病。结论:NLR、PLR标志物与CRP、ESR等传统炎症标志物有显著相关性。这些新的标记物可能是评估RA活性的有用工具,提供了一种具有成本效益的替代成像技术。需要进一步的研究来证实它们的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of hematological markers as prognostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: Reducing inflammation is central to the management of RA. However, commonly used markers such as CRP and ESR, along with the DAS-28 score, have shown limitations. Hematologic indices, such as platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), show potential as reliable indicators of inflammation in RA. This study evaluates these markers across different RA activity levels to identify effective biomarkers for distinguishing active RA from remission.

Materials and methods: 305 RA patients were enrolled in our study, diagnosed by ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria, and divided into four groups according to the DAS28-ESR score. 8 ml of blood were taken for a CBC test and serological tests such as rheumatoid factor (RF), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed as potential markers of inflammation.

Results: The mean age of RA patients was 51.7 years and a disease duration of 56.7 months. Significant differences in tender and swollen joints were observed between RA groups. Laboratory findings revealed higher CRP and ESR in active RA patients, while hemoglobin, hematocrit, and lymphocyte counts were higher in remission group. ROC analysis showed ESR, CRP, NLR, and PLR as potential markers for distinguishing active from remission RA, with ESR demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy. LMR could not differentiate between active and inactive forms of RA disease.

Conclusion: The NLR and PLR markers were significantly correlated with traditional inflammatory markers like CRP and ESR. These novel markers could be useful tools for evaluating RA activity, offering a cost-effective alternative to imaging techniques. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A rare intersection: squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil and the anti-TIF1 syndrome masquerade. Altered medial temporal lobe subregion volumes in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Efficacy and safety of avacopan in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. Use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and risk of multiple myeloma in US Veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Correction: Benefits of a Juvenile Arthritis Support Program (JASP-1) for children recently diagnosed with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and their parents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1