男性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的准确性和结果:叙述回顾和专家意见。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31120557
Calogero Cipolla, Vittorio Gebbia, Eleonora D'Agati, Martina Greco, Chiara Mesi, Giuseppa Scandurra, Daniela Sambataro, Maria Rosaria Valerio
{"title":"男性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的准确性和结果:叙述回顾和专家意见。","authors":"Calogero Cipolla, Vittorio Gebbia, Eleonora D'Agati, Martina Greco, Chiara Mesi, Giuseppa Scandurra, Daniela Sambataro, Maria Rosaria Valerio","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31120557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in breast cancer, offering reduced morbidity and comparable accuracy. However, the application of SLNB in MBC remains underexplored, with limited male-specific data and treatment protocols often extrapolated from female breast cancer studies. Available evidence suggests that SLNB in men demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, with low false-negative rates and a high sentinel lymph node identification rate. Despite this, there is ongoing debate about its long-term impact on clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with sentinel node metastasis, where ALND may still provide superior survival outcomes in some cases. Predictive tools are being developed to identify better patients who may benefit from SLNB alone, potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures. As the role of SLNB continues to evolve in MBC management, further prospective research is needed to refine its application and assess its long-term oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 12","pages":"7566-7574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Male with Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion.\",\"authors\":\"Calogero Cipolla, Vittorio Gebbia, Eleonora D'Agati, Martina Greco, Chiara Mesi, Giuseppa Scandurra, Daniela Sambataro, Maria Rosaria Valerio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31120557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in breast cancer, offering reduced morbidity and comparable accuracy. However, the application of SLNB in MBC remains underexplored, with limited male-specific data and treatment protocols often extrapolated from female breast cancer studies. Available evidence suggests that SLNB in men demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, with low false-negative rates and a high sentinel lymph node identification rate. Despite this, there is ongoing debate about its long-term impact on clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with sentinel node metastasis, where ALND may still provide superior survival outcomes in some cases. Predictive tools are being developed to identify better patients who may benefit from SLNB alone, potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures. As the role of SLNB continues to evolve in MBC management, further prospective research is needed to refine its application and assess its long-term oncologic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"7566-7574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

男性乳腺癌(MBC)是一种罕见的疾病,占所有乳腺癌病例的不到1%。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)已成为一种侵入性较低的替代腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的乳腺癌腋窝分期方法,具有降低发病率和相当的准确性。然而,SLNB在MBC中的应用仍未得到充分探索,男性特异性数据有限,治疗方案通常从女性乳腺癌研究中推断出来。现有证据表明,男性SLNB的诊断准确性高,假阴性率低,前哨淋巴结识别率高。尽管如此,关于其对临床结果的长期影响仍存在争议,特别是对于前哨淋巴结转移的患者,在某些情况下,ALND仍可能提供更好的生存结果。目前正在开发预测工具,以识别可能仅从SLNB中获益的更好的患者,从而潜在地减少对更多侵入性手术的需求。随着SLNB在MBC治疗中的作用不断发展,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来完善其应用并评估其长期肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Male with Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion.

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in breast cancer, offering reduced morbidity and comparable accuracy. However, the application of SLNB in MBC remains underexplored, with limited male-specific data and treatment protocols often extrapolated from female breast cancer studies. Available evidence suggests that SLNB in men demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, with low false-negative rates and a high sentinel lymph node identification rate. Despite this, there is ongoing debate about its long-term impact on clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with sentinel node metastasis, where ALND may still provide superior survival outcomes in some cases. Predictive tools are being developed to identify better patients who may benefit from SLNB alone, potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures. As the role of SLNB continues to evolve in MBC management, further prospective research is needed to refine its application and assess its long-term oncologic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
MicroRNA-129-3p Suppresses Tumor Progression and Chemoradioresistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Real-World Experience with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Palliative Setting for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer After CDK4/6 Inhibitors. The PREPARE Study: Acceptability and Feasibility of a Telehealth Trimodal Prehabilitation Program for Women with Endometrial Neoplasia. Advancing Radiobiology: Investigating the Effects of Photon, Proton, and Carbon-Ion Irradiation on PANC-1 Cells in 2D and 3D Tumor Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1