拉丁美洲(LATAM)公共机构中激素受体(HR)阳性/ her2阴性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的一线(1L)治疗决策模式和生存率

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31120581
Guillermo Valencia, Patricia Rioja, Miguel Chirito, Olenka Peralta, Jorge Sánchez, Connie Rabanal, Raúl Mantilla, Zaida Morante, Hugo Fuentes, Carlos Castaneda, Tatiana Vidaurre, Cristian Pacheco, Silvia Neciosup, Henry L Gomez
{"title":"拉丁美洲(LATAM)公共机构中激素受体(HR)阳性/ her2阴性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的一线(1L)治疗决策模式和生存率","authors":"Guillermo Valencia, Patricia Rioja, Miguel Chirito, Olenka Peralta, Jorge Sánchez, Connie Rabanal, Raúl Mantilla, Zaida Morante, Hugo Fuentes, Carlos Castaneda, Tatiana Vidaurre, Cristian Pacheco, Silvia Neciosup, Henry L Gomez","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31120581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced breast cancer is an incurable disease, with a median overall survival of 3 years, including in countries without access problems. Although chemotherapy is reserved in some cases, it is still used in many countries as a first-line therapy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the first-line treatment choices and the factors that influence therapeutic decisions. A retrospective analysis was conducted of hormone receptor (+)/HER2 (-) advanced breast cancer patients classified into three groups according to the first-line and second-line treatment received: endocrine therapy-chemotherapy, endocrine therapy-endocrine therapy and chemotherapy-endocrine therapy. Additionally, we explored the overall survival of sequencing therapy groups. First-line chemotherapy was chosen in 34% of patients. Also, around 60% of our patients met the \"aggressive disease\" criteria from the RIGHT Choice trial, justifying the use of chemotherapy in a population with poor prognosis. Furthermore, de novo and progressive disease were prognostic factors that influenced the use of chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Regarding overall survival, the sequencing treatment groups in this trial saw an increase in survival compared with patients of the MONALEESA trials (endocrine therapy alone arms). No significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were found in the treatment sequencing groups. There was a higher use of chemotherapy as a first-line therapy, with de novo and \"aggressive disease\" criteria being the main factors to influence the decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 12","pages":"7890-7902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Line (1L) Treatment Decision Patterns and Survival of Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Patients in a Latin American (LATAM) Public Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Valencia, Patricia Rioja, Miguel Chirito, Olenka Peralta, Jorge Sánchez, Connie Rabanal, Raúl Mantilla, Zaida Morante, Hugo Fuentes, Carlos Castaneda, Tatiana Vidaurre, Cristian Pacheco, Silvia Neciosup, Henry L Gomez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31120581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advanced breast cancer is an incurable disease, with a median overall survival of 3 years, including in countries without access problems. Although chemotherapy is reserved in some cases, it is still used in many countries as a first-line therapy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the first-line treatment choices and the factors that influence therapeutic decisions. A retrospective analysis was conducted of hormone receptor (+)/HER2 (-) advanced breast cancer patients classified into three groups according to the first-line and second-line treatment received: endocrine therapy-chemotherapy, endocrine therapy-endocrine therapy and chemotherapy-endocrine therapy. Additionally, we explored the overall survival of sequencing therapy groups. First-line chemotherapy was chosen in 34% of patients. Also, around 60% of our patients met the \\\"aggressive disease\\\" criteria from the RIGHT Choice trial, justifying the use of chemotherapy in a population with poor prognosis. Furthermore, de novo and progressive disease were prognostic factors that influenced the use of chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Regarding overall survival, the sequencing treatment groups in this trial saw an increase in survival compared with patients of the MONALEESA trials (endocrine therapy alone arms). No significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were found in the treatment sequencing groups. There was a higher use of chemotherapy as a first-line therapy, with de novo and \\\"aggressive disease\\\" criteria being the main factors to influence the decision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"7890-7902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

晚期乳腺癌是一种无法治愈的疾病,中位总生存期为3年,包括在没有获取问题的国家。虽然在某些情况下保留化疗,但在许多国家仍将其作为一线治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估一线治疗选择和影响治疗决策的因素。回顾性分析激素受体(+)/HER2(-)晚期乳腺癌患者根据接受一线和二线治疗分为三组:内分泌治疗-化疗、内分泌治疗-内分泌治疗和化疗-内分泌治疗。此外,我们探讨了测序治疗组的总生存率。34%的患者选择一线化疗。此外,大约60%的患者符合RIGHT Choice试验的“侵袭性疾病”标准,这证明在预后不良的人群中使用化疗是合理的。此外,新生和疾病进展是影响化疗作为一线治疗的预后因素。关于总生存期,与MONALEESA试验(单独内分泌治疗组)的患者相比,该试验中测序治疗组的患者生存期增加。在治疗顺序组中,无进展生存期或总生存期未发现显著差异。化疗作为一线治疗的使用率较高,新发和“侵袭性疾病”标准是影响决定的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First-Line (1L) Treatment Decision Patterns and Survival of Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Patients in a Latin American (LATAM) Public Institution.

Advanced breast cancer is an incurable disease, with a median overall survival of 3 years, including in countries without access problems. Although chemotherapy is reserved in some cases, it is still used in many countries as a first-line therapy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the first-line treatment choices and the factors that influence therapeutic decisions. A retrospective analysis was conducted of hormone receptor (+)/HER2 (-) advanced breast cancer patients classified into three groups according to the first-line and second-line treatment received: endocrine therapy-chemotherapy, endocrine therapy-endocrine therapy and chemotherapy-endocrine therapy. Additionally, we explored the overall survival of sequencing therapy groups. First-line chemotherapy was chosen in 34% of patients. Also, around 60% of our patients met the "aggressive disease" criteria from the RIGHT Choice trial, justifying the use of chemotherapy in a population with poor prognosis. Furthermore, de novo and progressive disease were prognostic factors that influenced the use of chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Regarding overall survival, the sequencing treatment groups in this trial saw an increase in survival compared with patients of the MONALEESA trials (endocrine therapy alone arms). No significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were found in the treatment sequencing groups. There was a higher use of chemotherapy as a first-line therapy, with de novo and "aggressive disease" criteria being the main factors to influence the decision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
MicroRNA-129-3p Suppresses Tumor Progression and Chemoradioresistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Real-World Experience with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Palliative Setting for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer After CDK4/6 Inhibitors. The PREPARE Study: Acceptability and Feasibility of a Telehealth Trimodal Prehabilitation Program for Women with Endometrial Neoplasia. Advancing Radiobiology: Investigating the Effects of Photon, Proton, and Carbon-Ion Irradiation on PANC-1 Cells in 2D and 3D Tumor Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1