Konstantinos Kamposioras, Panagiotis Ntellas, Katerina Dadouli, Eleftherios Christodoulis, Marios Adamou, Daniel Anderson, Anup Shanthappa, Jacqueline Connell, Joseph Williams, Lilly Simpson, Theodora Germetaki, Michael Braun, Jorge Barriuso, Jurjees Hasan, Saifee Mullamitha, Kalena Marti, Mark Saunders, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim
{"title":"结直肠癌患者心理健康的纵向随访:PICO-SM的最终分析。","authors":"Konstantinos Kamposioras, Panagiotis Ntellas, Katerina Dadouli, Eleftherios Christodoulis, Marios Adamou, Daniel Anderson, Anup Shanthappa, Jacqueline Connell, Joseph Williams, Lilly Simpson, Theodora Germetaki, Michael Braun, Jorge Barriuso, Jurjees Hasan, Saifee Mullamitha, Kalena Marti, Mark Saunders, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31120582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PICO-SM was a prospective longitudinal study investigating the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with colorectal cancer treated in a large UK tertiary cancer centre. Here, we present the impact of the third wave of the pandemic (December 2021 to February 2022), when the Omicron variant became prevalent in the UK, and the complete longitudinal comparison across the entire duration of this study. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. In total, n = 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Specifically, in this Omicron-predominant wave, n = 96 patients were studied in detail: the mean age was 64 years, 64% were male, 33% reported poor well-being, 27% anxiety, 11% depressive symptoms, and 3% trauma-related symptoms. The participants who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09-77.85; <i>p</i> = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96-7.44; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had an increased risk of anxiety according to a multivariate analysis. Similarly, independent predictors of poor well-being included concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03-20.56; <i>p</i> = 0.046) or mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38-11.03; <i>p</i> = 0.010). The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These results align with our previously reported findings, emphasising the importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst an ongoing humanitarian emergency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 12","pages":"7903-7913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Follow-Up of the Psychological Well-Being of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of PICO-SM.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Kamposioras, Panagiotis Ntellas, Katerina Dadouli, Eleftherios Christodoulis, Marios Adamou, Daniel Anderson, Anup Shanthappa, Jacqueline Connell, Joseph Williams, Lilly Simpson, Theodora Germetaki, Michael Braun, Jorge Barriuso, Jurjees Hasan, Saifee Mullamitha, Kalena Marti, Mark Saunders, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31120582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PICO-SM was a prospective longitudinal study investigating the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with colorectal cancer treated in a large UK tertiary cancer centre. Here, we present the impact of the third wave of the pandemic (December 2021 to February 2022), when the Omicron variant became prevalent in the UK, and the complete longitudinal comparison across the entire duration of this study. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. In total, n = 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Specifically, in this Omicron-predominant wave, n = 96 patients were studied in detail: the mean age was 64 years, 64% were male, 33% reported poor well-being, 27% anxiety, 11% depressive symptoms, and 3% trauma-related symptoms. The participants who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09-77.85; <i>p</i> = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96-7.44; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had an increased risk of anxiety according to a multivariate analysis. Similarly, independent predictors of poor well-being included concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03-20.56; <i>p</i> = 0.046) or mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38-11.03; <i>p</i> = 0.010). The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These results align with our previously reported findings, emphasising the importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst an ongoing humanitarian emergency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"7903-7913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120582\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
PICO-SM是一项前瞻性纵向研究,旨在调查COVID-19大流行对英国一家大型三级癌症中心治疗的结直肠癌患者的心理影响。在这里,我们介绍了第三波大流行(2021年12月至2022年2月)的影响,当时欧米克隆变异在英国流行,并在整个研究期间进行了完整的纵向比较。患者被邀请完成一份问卷,包括筛选心理测量工具。最终分析共纳入n = 312例患者。具体来说,在这个以omicron为主的波中,详细研究了n = 96例患者:平均年龄为64岁,64%为男性,33%报告幸福感差,27%焦虑,11%抑郁症状,3%创伤相关症状。取消调查的参与者(OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09-77.85;p = 0.041)或认为大流行会影响他们的心理健康(or 3.82, 95% CI 1.96-7.44;多变量分析显示,P < 0.001)焦虑风险增加。同样,健康状况不佳的独立预测因素包括担心大流行会影响他们的癌症治疗(OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03-20.56;p = 0.046)或心理健康(or 3.90, 95% CI 1.38-11.03;P = 0.010)。在第三波COVID-19大流行期间,患者经历的心理困扰,特别是焦虑,仍然很高。这些结果与我们之前报告的结果一致,强调了在持续的人道主义紧急情况下继续进行癌症治疗的重要性。
Longitudinal Follow-Up of the Psychological Well-Being of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of PICO-SM.
PICO-SM was a prospective longitudinal study investigating the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with colorectal cancer treated in a large UK tertiary cancer centre. Here, we present the impact of the third wave of the pandemic (December 2021 to February 2022), when the Omicron variant became prevalent in the UK, and the complete longitudinal comparison across the entire duration of this study. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. In total, n = 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Specifically, in this Omicron-predominant wave, n = 96 patients were studied in detail: the mean age was 64 years, 64% were male, 33% reported poor well-being, 27% anxiety, 11% depressive symptoms, and 3% trauma-related symptoms. The participants who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09-77.85; p = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96-7.44; p < 0.001) had an increased risk of anxiety according to a multivariate analysis. Similarly, independent predictors of poor well-being included concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03-20.56; p = 0.046) or mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38-11.03; p = 0.010). The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These results align with our previously reported findings, emphasising the importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst an ongoing humanitarian emergency.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.