日本调查委员会分类的C型股骨头坏死的x线与磁共振成像差异。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x
Keiji Otaka, Yusuke Osawa, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroto Funahashi, Shiro Imagama
{"title":"日本调查委员会分类的C型股骨头坏死的x线与磁共振成像差异。","authors":"Keiji Otaka, Yusuke Osawa, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroto Funahashi, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is based on the necrotic area relative to the weight-bearing surface on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs or central coronal MRI. Discrepancies exist between these methods, potentially related to the AP necrosis area. This study evaluated these discrepancies and the extent of AP necrotic lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 139 patients (188 hips) with nontraumatic ONFH, JIC type C1 or C2 on radiography, and collapse < 3 mm. Cases with and without discrepancies between radiography and MRI were designated as discrepancy and consistent groups, respectively. We assessed the proportion of patients in the discrepancy group and survival rates in both groups, with femoral head collapse > 3 mm as the endpoint. The cutoff value for AP necrotic regions on lateral radiographs identifying discrepancies was calculated using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discrepancy group comprised 28 hips (14.9%) vs. 160 hips in the consistent group. Five-year survival rates were 73.3% vs. 31.9% (P < 0.01), and AP necrotic region extent was 61.2 vs. 73.8 mm (P < 0.001) in discrepancy vs. consistent groups. The cutoff value for necrotic region extent revealing discrepancies was 66.9% (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 82.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AP necrotic regions < 66.9% were more likely to show discrepancies between radiography and MRI in type classification. This study can help improve accuracy in assessing ONFH severity and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancy between radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in Japanese Investigation Committee classification type C osteonecrosis of the femoral head.\",\"authors\":\"Keiji Otaka, Yusuke Osawa, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroto Funahashi, Shiro Imagama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is based on the necrotic area relative to the weight-bearing surface on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs or central coronal MRI. Discrepancies exist between these methods, potentially related to the AP necrosis area. This study evaluated these discrepancies and the extent of AP necrotic lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 139 patients (188 hips) with nontraumatic ONFH, JIC type C1 or C2 on radiography, and collapse < 3 mm. Cases with and without discrepancies between radiography and MRI were designated as discrepancy and consistent groups, respectively. We assessed the proportion of patients in the discrepancy group and survival rates in both groups, with femoral head collapse > 3 mm as the endpoint. The cutoff value for AP necrotic regions on lateral radiographs identifying discrepancies was calculated using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discrepancy group comprised 28 hips (14.9%) vs. 160 hips in the consistent group. Five-year survival rates were 73.3% vs. 31.9% (P < 0.01), and AP necrotic region extent was 61.2 vs. 73.8 mm (P < 0.001) in discrepancy vs. consistent groups. The cutoff value for necrotic region extent revealing discrepancies was 66.9% (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 82.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AP necrotic regions < 66.9% were more likely to show discrepancies between radiography and MRI in type classification. This study can help improve accuracy in assessing ONFH severity and prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"391-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:日本调查委员会(JIC)对股骨头骨坏死(ONFH)的分类是基于正位(AP) x线片或中央冠状位MRI上相对于负重面的坏死区域。这些方法之间存在差异,可能与AP坏死区域有关。本研究评估了这些差异和AP坏死病变的程度。方法:我们回顾性分析了139例(188髋)非外伤性ONFH, JIC型C1或C2 x线片,以塌陷3mm为终点。通过ROC曲线分析计算侧位片上AP坏死区域识别差异的临界值。结果:差异组有28髋(14.9%),而一致组有160髋。5年生存率分别为73.3%和31.9% (P)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discrepancy between radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in Japanese Investigation Committee classification type C osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Purpose: The Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is based on the necrotic area relative to the weight-bearing surface on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs or central coronal MRI. Discrepancies exist between these methods, potentially related to the AP necrosis area. This study evaluated these discrepancies and the extent of AP necrotic lesions.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 139 patients (188 hips) with nontraumatic ONFH, JIC type C1 or C2 on radiography, and collapse < 3 mm. Cases with and without discrepancies between radiography and MRI were designated as discrepancy and consistent groups, respectively. We assessed the proportion of patients in the discrepancy group and survival rates in both groups, with femoral head collapse > 3 mm as the endpoint. The cutoff value for AP necrotic regions on lateral radiographs identifying discrepancies was calculated using ROC curve analysis.

Results: The discrepancy group comprised 28 hips (14.9%) vs. 160 hips in the consistent group. Five-year survival rates were 73.3% vs. 31.9% (P < 0.01), and AP necrotic region extent was 61.2 vs. 73.8 mm (P < 0.001) in discrepancy vs. consistent groups. The cutoff value for necrotic region extent revealing discrepancies was 66.9% (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 82.4%).

Conclusion: Patients with AP necrotic regions < 66.9% were more likely to show discrepancies between radiography and MRI in type classification. This study can help improve accuracy in assessing ONFH severity and prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Fatty infiltration of periarticular muscles in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The role of nerve transfers in chronic nerve compression syndromes. Advantages in orthopaedic implant infection diagnostics by additional analysis of explants. Arthroscopic management of knee synovial chondromatosis: a systematic review of outcomes and recurrence. Immediate weight-bearing after tibial plateau fractures internal fixation results in better clinical outcomes with similar radiological outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1