孕妇参与临床研究的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法的系统综述。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12663
Yicheng Gao, Zijin Yu, Xinyu Zeng, Yixuan Guo, Zikun Liu, Xinyi Yan, Tiantian Guo, Chuanya Yan, Zhihan Liu, Yutong Fei
{"title":"孕妇参与临床研究的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法的系统综述。","authors":"Yicheng Gao,&nbsp;Zijin Yu,&nbsp;Xinyu Zeng,&nbsp;Yixuan Guo,&nbsp;Zikun Liu,&nbsp;Xinyi Yan,&nbsp;Tiantian Guo,&nbsp;Chuanya Yan,&nbsp;Zhihan Liu,&nbsp;Yutong Fei","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Pregnant women had a large demand for diagnosis and treatment, but the clinical research was not sufficient, and there were many barriers for pregnant women to participate in clinical research. This study aimed to systematically identify these barriers and facilitators, map them with Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) to inform the development of interventions promoting pregnant women's involvement in clinical research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a mixed-methods systematic review. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and related references were searched. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies exploring barriers and facilitators to pregnant women's participation in clinical trials were included. The barriers and facilitators were extracted, after transforming the quantitative data into qualitative data, all qualitative data were used to thematic synthesis. The identified barriers and facilitators were mapped into TDF and BCTs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 103 studies (66 qualitative, 24 quantitative, and 13 mixed-methods) were included. Three main themes were formed: personal factors, environmental factors and research characteristics, with identified barriers and facilitators within each theme. “Knowledge,” “Environmental Context and Resources,” and “Beliefs about Consequences” were the main domains where barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women and researchers were mapped in TDF. Additionally, the barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women also mapped on “Social Influences” and “Goals.” “Instruction on how to perform a behavior,” “restructuring the physical environment,” “salience of consequences,” “social support (unspecified),” “goal setting (outcome)” were the main BCTs identified based on barriers and facilitators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The barriers and facilitators to clinical research participation identified in this study involved three main themes of personal, environmental, and research characteristics, which mainly mapped to five TDF domains. Based on these barriers and facilitators, 23 BCTs were identified. Future research should focus on developing behavior change interventions, assessing their efficacy and implementability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"17 4","pages":"782-794"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Yicheng Gao,&nbsp;Zijin Yu,&nbsp;Xinyu Zeng,&nbsp;Yixuan Guo,&nbsp;Zikun Liu,&nbsp;Xinyi Yan,&nbsp;Tiantian Guo,&nbsp;Chuanya Yan,&nbsp;Zhihan Liu,&nbsp;Yutong Fei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jebm.12663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pregnant women had a large demand for diagnosis and treatment, but the clinical research was not sufficient, and there were many barriers for pregnant women to participate in clinical research. This study aimed to systematically identify these barriers and facilitators, map them with Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) to inform the development of interventions promoting pregnant women's involvement in clinical research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a mixed-methods systematic review. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and related references were searched. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies exploring barriers and facilitators to pregnant women's participation in clinical trials were included. The barriers and facilitators were extracted, after transforming the quantitative data into qualitative data, all qualitative data were used to thematic synthesis. The identified barriers and facilitators were mapped into TDF and BCTs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 103 studies (66 qualitative, 24 quantitative, and 13 mixed-methods) were included. Three main themes were formed: personal factors, environmental factors and research characteristics, with identified barriers and facilitators within each theme. “Knowledge,” “Environmental Context and Resources,” and “Beliefs about Consequences” were the main domains where barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women and researchers were mapped in TDF. Additionally, the barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women also mapped on “Social Influences” and “Goals.” “Instruction on how to perform a behavior,” “restructuring the physical environment,” “salience of consequences,” “social support (unspecified),” “goal setting (outcome)” were the main BCTs identified based on barriers and facilitators.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The barriers and facilitators to clinical research participation identified in this study involved three main themes of personal, environmental, and research characteristics, which mainly mapped to five TDF domains. Based on these barriers and facilitators, 23 BCTs were identified. Future research should focus on developing behavior change interventions, assessing their efficacy and implementability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"782-794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12663\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:孕妇诊疗需求大,但临床研究不足,孕妇参与临床研究存在诸多障碍。本研究旨在系统地识别这些障碍和促进因素,并将其与理论领域框架(TDF)和行为改变技术(bct)相结合,为促进孕妇参与临床研究的干预措施的制定提供信息。方法:采用混合方法进行系统评价。检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、APA PsycInfo、CINAHL、中国知识基础设施、万方、中国技术期刊VIP库、中国生物医学文献库及相关文献。包括定性、定量和混合方法研究,探讨孕妇参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素。提取障碍和促进因素,将定量数据转化为定性数据后,将所有定性数据用于专题综合。确定的障碍和促进因素被映射到TDF和bct中。结果:共纳入103项研究,其中定性方法66项,定量方法24项,混合方法13项。形成了三个主要主题:个人因素、环境因素和研究特征,并在每个主题中确定了障碍和促进因素。“知识”、“环境背景和资源”和“关于后果的信念”是孕妇和研究人员在TDF中确定障碍和促进因素的主要领域。此外,孕妇确定的障碍和促进因素也反映在“社会影响”和“目标”上。“如何执行行为的指导”、“重建物理环境”、“后果的突出性”、“社会支持(未指明)”、“目标设定(结果)”是基于障碍和促进因素确定的主要btc。结论:本研究确定的临床研究参与的障碍和促进因素涉及个人、环境和研究特征三个主要主题,主要映射到五个TDF域。基于这些障碍和促进因素,确定了23个btc。未来的研究应侧重于制定行为改变干预措施,评估其有效性和可实施性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and Facilitators to the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

Objectives

Pregnant women had a large demand for diagnosis and treatment, but the clinical research was not sufficient, and there were many barriers for pregnant women to participate in clinical research. This study aimed to systematically identify these barriers and facilitators, map them with Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) to inform the development of interventions promoting pregnant women's involvement in clinical research.

Methods

This was a mixed-methods systematic review. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and related references were searched. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies exploring barriers and facilitators to pregnant women's participation in clinical trials were included. The barriers and facilitators were extracted, after transforming the quantitative data into qualitative data, all qualitative data were used to thematic synthesis. The identified barriers and facilitators were mapped into TDF and BCTs.

Results

A total of 103 studies (66 qualitative, 24 quantitative, and 13 mixed-methods) were included. Three main themes were formed: personal factors, environmental factors and research characteristics, with identified barriers and facilitators within each theme. “Knowledge,” “Environmental Context and Resources,” and “Beliefs about Consequences” were the main domains where barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women and researchers were mapped in TDF. Additionally, the barriers and facilitators identified by pregnant women also mapped on “Social Influences” and “Goals.” “Instruction on how to perform a behavior,” “restructuring the physical environment,” “salience of consequences,” “social support (unspecified),” “goal setting (outcome)” were the main BCTs identified based on barriers and facilitators.

Conclusions

The barriers and facilitators to clinical research participation identified in this study involved three main themes of personal, environmental, and research characteristics, which mainly mapped to five TDF domains. Based on these barriers and facilitators, 23 BCTs were identified. Future research should focus on developing behavior change interventions, assessing their efficacy and implementability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Extraversion and the Brain: A Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies on Positive Affect. Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Topical NSAIDs in the Treatment of Sports Injuries. Issue Information Barriers and Facilitators to the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1