各州对基于药物的clia豁免检测的吸收差异:法律法规的影响。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1177/87551225241306678
Alex J Adams, Donald G Klepser, Michael E Klepser
{"title":"各州对基于药物的clia豁免检测的吸收差异:法律法规的影响。","authors":"Alex J Adams, Donald G Klepser, Michael E Klepser","doi":"10.1177/87551225241306678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Community pharmacies have grown to be an increasingly important provider of CLIA-waived tests, just second to physician offices as the venue with the most waivers. Yet, individual variation is still observed across states with respect to the percentage of pharmacies holding a CLIA-waiver, with a reported range of 10.7% in Massachusetts to 87.9% in Delaware. <b>Objective:</b> To identify how state laws can either impede or enhance access to POCT services by pharmacies by comparing the percentage of pharmacies in each state holding a CLIA-waiver to the legal model for POCT services in each state. <b>Methods:</b> Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLIA Laboratory Search website reported on December 4, 2023, were used to determine the number of pharmacies holding CLIA-waivers in each state. This was then divided by the number of community pharmacies in each state, as reported in the 2023 National Community Pharmacy Association Digest, and then compared with 2 public reports on pharmacy CLIA laws. <b>Results:</b> States categorized as allowing pharmacists to independently perform CLIA-waived tests in public reports actually had a lower percentage of pharmacies with a CLIA-waiver (49.60%) than those categorized as <i>not</i> allowing CLIA-waived tests (60.19%). As many as 10 241 pharmacies hold a CLIA-waiver in states that did not affirmatively report that pharmacists ordering lab tests was allowed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The paradoxical finding is likely a result of the underreporting of pharmacist CLIA-waived testing authority given the complexity of pharmacy law relative to other professions. Simplifying pharmacy law through adoption of a \"standard of care\" regulatory approach may enhance patient access to POCT services moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225241306678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations.\",\"authors\":\"Alex J Adams, Donald G Klepser, Michael E Klepser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225241306678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Community pharmacies have grown to be an increasingly important provider of CLIA-waived tests, just second to physician offices as the venue with the most waivers. Yet, individual variation is still observed across states with respect to the percentage of pharmacies holding a CLIA-waiver, with a reported range of 10.7% in Massachusetts to 87.9% in Delaware. <b>Objective:</b> To identify how state laws can either impede or enhance access to POCT services by pharmacies by comparing the percentage of pharmacies in each state holding a CLIA-waiver to the legal model for POCT services in each state. <b>Methods:</b> Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLIA Laboratory Search website reported on December 4, 2023, were used to determine the number of pharmacies holding CLIA-waivers in each state. This was then divided by the number of community pharmacies in each state, as reported in the 2023 National Community Pharmacy Association Digest, and then compared with 2 public reports on pharmacy CLIA laws. <b>Results:</b> States categorized as allowing pharmacists to independently perform CLIA-waived tests in public reports actually had a lower percentage of pharmacies with a CLIA-waiver (49.60%) than those categorized as <i>not</i> allowing CLIA-waived tests (60.19%). As many as 10 241 pharmacies hold a CLIA-waiver in states that did not affirmatively report that pharmacists ordering lab tests was allowed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The paradoxical finding is likely a result of the underreporting of pharmacist CLIA-waived testing authority given the complexity of pharmacy law relative to other professions. Simplifying pharmacy law through adoption of a \\\"standard of care\\\" regulatory approach may enhance patient access to POCT services moving forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87551225241306678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241306678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241306678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社区药房已成为越来越重要的clia豁免测试提供者,仅次于医生办公室,是豁免最多的场所。然而,在持有clia豁免的药店百分比方面,各州之间仍然存在个体差异,据报道,马萨诸塞州的比例为10.7%,特拉华州为87.9%。目的:通过比较每个州持有clia豁免的药店百分比与每个州POCT服务的法律模式,确定州法律如何阻碍或加强药房获得POCT服务。方法:使用2023年12月4日美国疾病控制和预防中心CLIA实验室搜索网站上的数据来确定每个州持有CLIA豁免的药店数量。然后将这些数据除以2023年《全国社区药房协会文摘》(National community Pharmacy Association Digest)中报告的每个州社区药房的数量,然后与两份关于药房CLIA法律的公开报告进行比较。结果:在公开报告中被归类为允许药剂师独立执行clia豁免测试的州,实际上具有clia豁免的药店比例(49.60%)低于不允许clia豁免测试的药店比例(60.19%)。在没有明确报告允许药剂师订购实验室测试的州,多达10241家药店持有clia豁免。结论:这一矛盾的发现很可能是由于相对于其他专业而言,药学法律的复杂性使药剂师少报了美国药检协会放弃的检测权限。通过采用“护理标准”管理方法来简化药房法,可能会提高患者获得POCT服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations.

Background: Community pharmacies have grown to be an increasingly important provider of CLIA-waived tests, just second to physician offices as the venue with the most waivers. Yet, individual variation is still observed across states with respect to the percentage of pharmacies holding a CLIA-waiver, with a reported range of 10.7% in Massachusetts to 87.9% in Delaware. Objective: To identify how state laws can either impede or enhance access to POCT services by pharmacies by comparing the percentage of pharmacies in each state holding a CLIA-waiver to the legal model for POCT services in each state. Methods: Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLIA Laboratory Search website reported on December 4, 2023, were used to determine the number of pharmacies holding CLIA-waivers in each state. This was then divided by the number of community pharmacies in each state, as reported in the 2023 National Community Pharmacy Association Digest, and then compared with 2 public reports on pharmacy CLIA laws. Results: States categorized as allowing pharmacists to independently perform CLIA-waived tests in public reports actually had a lower percentage of pharmacies with a CLIA-waiver (49.60%) than those categorized as not allowing CLIA-waived tests (60.19%). As many as 10 241 pharmacies hold a CLIA-waiver in states that did not affirmatively report that pharmacists ordering lab tests was allowed. Conclusion: The paradoxical finding is likely a result of the underreporting of pharmacist CLIA-waived testing authority given the complexity of pharmacy law relative to other professions. Simplifying pharmacy law through adoption of a "standard of care" regulatory approach may enhance patient access to POCT services moving forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Persistence After Switching From Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 to Adalimumab Biosimilar GP2017 in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations. Risk of Tendon Injury in Patients Treated With Fluoroquinolone (FQ) Vs Non-Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Impact of Nonmedical Switches From Reference Infliximab to Biosimilars on Disease Control Within a Rheumatology Practice. Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Continuation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Late-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1