ICD-10在儿科急诊科遇到的自杀意念和行动代码的准确性

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003328
Rena Xu, Louisa Bode, Alon Geva, Kenneth D Mandl, Andrew J McMurry
{"title":"ICD-10在儿科急诊科遇到的自杀意念和行动代码的准确性","authors":"Rena Xu, Louisa Bode, Alon Geva, Kenneth D Mandl, Andrew J McMurry","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>According to the ideation-to-action framework of suicidality, suicidal ideation and suicidal action arise via distinct trajectories. Studying suicidality under this framework requires accurate identification of both ideation and action. We sought to assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for suicidal ideation and action in emergency department encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accuracy of ICD-10-CM coding for suicidality was assessed through chart review of clinical notes for 205 emergency department encounters among patients 6-18 years old at a large academic pediatric hospital between June 1, 2016 and June 1, 2022. Physician notes were reviewed for documentation of past or present suicidal ideation, suicidal action, or both. The study cohort consisted of 103 randomly selected \"cases,\" or encounters assigned at least 1 ICD-10-CM code for suicidality, and 102 propensity-matched \"noncases\" lacking ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Against a gold standard chart review, the positive predictive value for ICD-10-CM suicidality codes was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.5%-89.3%), and the negative predictive value was 76.2% (95% CI: 73.2%-79.2%). Nearly half of encounters involving suicidality were not captured by ICD-10-CM coding (sensitivity = 53.4%; 95% CI: 49.9%-56.9%). Sensitivity was higher for ideation-present (82.4%, 95% CI: 77.7%-87.1%) than for action-present (33.7%, 95% CI: 27.9%-39.5%) or action-past (20.4%, 95% CI: 15.5%-25.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many cases of suicidality may be missed by relying on only ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes is high for suicidal ideation but low for action. To scale the ideation-to-action model for use in large populations, better data sources are needed to identify cases of suicidal action.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of ICD-10 Codes for Suicidal Ideation and Action in Pediatric Emergency Department Encounters.\",\"authors\":\"Rena Xu, Louisa Bode, Alon Geva, Kenneth D Mandl, Andrew J McMurry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>According to the ideation-to-action framework of suicidality, suicidal ideation and suicidal action arise via distinct trajectories. Studying suicidality under this framework requires accurate identification of both ideation and action. We sought to assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for suicidal ideation and action in emergency department encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accuracy of ICD-10-CM coding for suicidality was assessed through chart review of clinical notes for 205 emergency department encounters among patients 6-18 years old at a large academic pediatric hospital between June 1, 2016 and June 1, 2022. Physician notes were reviewed for documentation of past or present suicidal ideation, suicidal action, or both. The study cohort consisted of 103 randomly selected \\\"cases,\\\" or encounters assigned at least 1 ICD-10-CM code for suicidality, and 102 propensity-matched \\\"noncases\\\" lacking ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Against a gold standard chart review, the positive predictive value for ICD-10-CM suicidality codes was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.5%-89.3%), and the negative predictive value was 76.2% (95% CI: 73.2%-79.2%). Nearly half of encounters involving suicidality were not captured by ICD-10-CM coding (sensitivity = 53.4%; 95% CI: 49.9%-56.9%). Sensitivity was higher for ideation-present (82.4%, 95% CI: 77.7%-87.1%) than for action-present (33.7%, 95% CI: 27.9%-39.5%) or action-past (20.4%, 95% CI: 15.5%-25.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many cases of suicidality may be missed by relying on only ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes is high for suicidal ideation but low for action. To scale the ideation-to-action model for use in large populations, better data sources are needed to identify cases of suicidal action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据自杀的观念到行动框架,自杀观念和自杀行为是通过不同的轨迹产生的。在这一框架下研究自杀需要准确地识别意念和行为。我们试图评估《国际疾病分类第十版临床修改》(ICD-10-CM)代码在自杀意念和急诊科遭遇行为方面的准确性。方法:通过对某大型学术儿科医院2016年6月1日至2022年6月1日205例6-18岁急诊科就诊患者的临床记录进行图表回顾,评估ICD-10-CM编码自杀倾向的准确性。回顾医生的记录,以确定过去或现在的自杀意念、自杀行为或两者兼而有之。研究队列包括103个随机选择的“病例”,或至少分配一个ICD-10-CM自杀代码的遭遇,以及102个倾向匹配的缺乏ICD-10-CM代码的“非病例”。采用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值评估ICD-10-CM编码的准确性。结果:对照金标准图回顾,ICD-10-CM自杀代码阳性预测值为86.9%(95%置信区间[CI]: 84.5% ~ 89.3%),阴性预测值为76.2% (95% CI: 73.2% ~ 79.2%)。近一半涉及自杀的遭遇未被ICD-10-CM编码捕获(灵敏度= 53.4%;95% ci: 49.9%-56.9%)。意念存在的敏感性(82.4%,95% CI: 77.7%-87.1%)高于行动存在的敏感性(33.7%,95% CI: 27.9%-39.5%)或过去的敏感性(20.4%,95% CI: 15.5%-25.3%)。结论:仅依靠ICD-10-CM编码可能会遗漏许多自杀病例。ICD-10-CM编码对自杀意念的准确率较高,但对行动的准确率较低。为了扩大概念到行动模式在大量人群中的应用,需要更好的数据来源来确定自杀行为的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of ICD-10 Codes for Suicidal Ideation and Action in Pediatric Emergency Department Encounters.

Objectives: According to the ideation-to-action framework of suicidality, suicidal ideation and suicidal action arise via distinct trajectories. Studying suicidality under this framework requires accurate identification of both ideation and action. We sought to assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for suicidal ideation and action in emergency department encounters.

Methods: Accuracy of ICD-10-CM coding for suicidality was assessed through chart review of clinical notes for 205 emergency department encounters among patients 6-18 years old at a large academic pediatric hospital between June 1, 2016 and June 1, 2022. Physician notes were reviewed for documentation of past or present suicidal ideation, suicidal action, or both. The study cohort consisted of 103 randomly selected "cases," or encounters assigned at least 1 ICD-10-CM code for suicidality, and 102 propensity-matched "noncases" lacking ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results: Against a gold standard chart review, the positive predictive value for ICD-10-CM suicidality codes was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.5%-89.3%), and the negative predictive value was 76.2% (95% CI: 73.2%-79.2%). Nearly half of encounters involving suicidality were not captured by ICD-10-CM coding (sensitivity = 53.4%; 95% CI: 49.9%-56.9%). Sensitivity was higher for ideation-present (82.4%, 95% CI: 77.7%-87.1%) than for action-present (33.7%, 95% CI: 27.9%-39.5%) or action-past (20.4%, 95% CI: 15.5%-25.3%).

Conclusions: Many cases of suicidality may be missed by relying on only ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes is high for suicidal ideation but low for action. To scale the ideation-to-action model for use in large populations, better data sources are needed to identify cases of suicidal action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Point-of-Care Ultrasound of a Pediatric Mediastinal Mass: A Case Report. Does Virtual Interviewing Provide the Information for a Satisfactory Rank Decision?: A Perspective From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Interviews. Pharmacotherapy for Agitation Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Procedural Entrustment Alignment Between Pediatric Residents and Their Preceptors in the Pediatric Emergency Department. A National Survey of Caregiver Needs and Experiences When Attending the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1