通过非目标分析(NTA)处理医疗器械可提取物和可浸出物分析评价阈值(AET)与定量。

Dennis Jenke, Piet Christiaens, Ted Heise
{"title":"通过非目标分析(NTA)处理医疗器械可提取物和可浸出物分析评价阈值(AET)与定量。","authors":"Dennis Jenke, Piet Christiaens, Ted Heise","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leachables leached from a medical device during its clinical use are important due to the patient health-related effects they may have. Thus, medical devices are profiled for leachables (and/or extractables as probable leachables) by screening extracts or leachates of the medical device for released organic substances via non-targeted analysis (NTA) employing chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographic mass spectral response factors for extractables and leachables vary significantly from compound to compound, complicating the application of assessment strategies such as the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET), which is the concentration threshold at or above which an extractable or leachable must be reported for quantitative toxicological risk assessment. The analytical uncertainty resulting from response variation can make interpretation of the AET difficult, potentially leading to both false positive and false negative outcomes. Furthermore, response factor variation complicates the estimation of leachables' and extractables' concentrations (quantification). This Correspondence discusses best practice recommendations for the calculation and application of the AET and for performing quantification, including a discussion of accuracy versus protectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Jenke, Piet Christiaens, Ted Heise\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leachables leached from a medical device during its clinical use are important due to the patient health-related effects they may have. Thus, medical devices are profiled for leachables (and/or extractables as probable leachables) by screening extracts or leachates of the medical device for released organic substances via non-targeted analysis (NTA) employing chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographic mass spectral response factors for extractables and leachables vary significantly from compound to compound, complicating the application of assessment strategies such as the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET), which is the concentration threshold at or above which an extractable or leachable must be reported for quantitative toxicological risk assessment. The analytical uncertainty resulting from response variation can make interpretation of the AET difficult, potentially leading to both false positive and false negative outcomes. Furthermore, response factor variation complicates the estimation of leachables' and extractables' concentrations (quantification). This Correspondence discusses best practice recommendations for the calculation and application of the AET and for performing quantification, including a discussion of accuracy versus protectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床使用期间从医疗设备中浸出的可浸物很重要,因为它们可能对患者健康产生影响。因此,通过采用色谱方法与质谱检测相结合的非靶向分析(NTA)筛选医疗器械的提取物或浸出液以检测释放的有机物质,从而对医疗器械进行可浸出物(和/或可提取物作为可能的可浸出物)的分析。可萃取物和可浸出物的色谱质谱响应因子因化合物而异,使评估策略的应用复杂化,例如分析评估阈值(AET),这是可萃取物或可浸物必须报告定量毒理学风险评估的浓度阈值。由反应变化引起的分析不确定性可能使AET的解释变得困难,可能导致假阳性和假阴性结果。此外,响应因子的变化使可浸出物和可萃取物浓度的估计(定量)复杂化。本通信讨论了AET的计算和应用以及执行量化的最佳实践建议,包括准确性与保护性的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation.

Leachables leached from a medical device during its clinical use are important due to the patient health-related effects they may have. Thus, medical devices are profiled for leachables (and/or extractables as probable leachables) by screening extracts or leachates of the medical device for released organic substances via non-targeted analysis (NTA) employing chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographic mass spectral response factors for extractables and leachables vary significantly from compound to compound, complicating the application of assessment strategies such as the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET), which is the concentration threshold at or above which an extractable or leachable must be reported for quantitative toxicological risk assessment. The analytical uncertainty resulting from response variation can make interpretation of the AET difficult, potentially leading to both false positive and false negative outcomes. Furthermore, response factor variation complicates the estimation of leachables' and extractables' concentrations (quantification). This Correspondence discusses best practice recommendations for the calculation and application of the AET and for performing quantification, including a discussion of accuracy versus protectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A Risk Assessment and Risk Based Approach Review of Pre-use/Post Sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT). Case Study: Visual Inspection of Topical Ophthalmic Formulations Packaged in Opaque and Semi-Transparent Containers: Working towards alignment with USP<790> Visible Inspection of Injections. Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1