{"title":"一个可视化癌症相关突变如何影响趋化因子受体CCR3结构可塑性的计算机框架。","authors":"Evan J van Aalst, Benjamin J Wylie","doi":"10.1002/pro.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>G protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors in humans. Somatic mutations in GPCRs are implicated in cancer progression and metastasis, but mechanisms are poorly understood. Emerging evidence implicates perturbation of intra-receptor activation pathway motifs whereby extracellular signals are transmitted intracellularly. Recently, sufficiently sensitive methodology was described to calculate structural strain as a function of missense mutations in AlphaFold-predicted model structures, which was extensively validated on experimental and predicted structural datasets. When paired with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, these tools provide a facile approach to screen mutations in silico. We applied this framework to calculate the structural and dynamic effects of cancer-associated mutations in the chemokine receptor CCR3, a Class A GPCR involved in cancer and autoimmune disorders. Residue-residue contact scoring refined effective strain results, highlighting significant remodeling of inter- and intra-motif contacts along the highly conserved GPCR activation pathway network. We then integrated AlphaFold-derived predicted Local Distance Difference Test scores with per-residue Root Mean Square Fluctuations and activation pathway Contact Analysis (CONAN) from coarse grain MD simulations to identify statistically significant changes in receptor dynamics upon mutation. Finally, analysis of negative control mutants suggests false positive results in AlphaFold pipelines should be considered but can be mitigated with stricter control of statistical analysis. Our results indicate selected mutants influence structural plasticity of CCR3 related to ligand interaction, activation, and G protein coupling, using a framework that could be applicable to a wide range of biochemically relevant protein targets following further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in silico framework to visualize how cancer-associated mutations influence structural plasticity of the chemokine receptor CCR3.\",\"authors\":\"Evan J van Aalst, Benjamin J Wylie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pro.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>G protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors in humans. Somatic mutations in GPCRs are implicated in cancer progression and metastasis, but mechanisms are poorly understood. Emerging evidence implicates perturbation of intra-receptor activation pathway motifs whereby extracellular signals are transmitted intracellularly. Recently, sufficiently sensitive methodology was described to calculate structural strain as a function of missense mutations in AlphaFold-predicted model structures, which was extensively validated on experimental and predicted structural datasets. When paired with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, these tools provide a facile approach to screen mutations in silico. We applied this framework to calculate the structural and dynamic effects of cancer-associated mutations in the chemokine receptor CCR3, a Class A GPCR involved in cancer and autoimmune disorders. Residue-residue contact scoring refined effective strain results, highlighting significant remodeling of inter- and intra-motif contacts along the highly conserved GPCR activation pathway network. We then integrated AlphaFold-derived predicted Local Distance Difference Test scores with per-residue Root Mean Square Fluctuations and activation pathway Contact Analysis (CONAN) from coarse grain MD simulations to identify statistically significant changes in receptor dynamics upon mutation. Finally, analysis of negative control mutants suggests false positive results in AlphaFold pipelines should be considered but can be mitigated with stricter control of statistical analysis. Our results indicate selected mutants influence structural plasticity of CCR3 related to ligand interaction, activation, and G protein coupling, using a framework that could be applicable to a wide range of biochemically relevant protein targets following further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protein Science\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"e70013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protein Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An in silico framework to visualize how cancer-associated mutations influence structural plasticity of the chemokine receptor CCR3.
G protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors in humans. Somatic mutations in GPCRs are implicated in cancer progression and metastasis, but mechanisms are poorly understood. Emerging evidence implicates perturbation of intra-receptor activation pathway motifs whereby extracellular signals are transmitted intracellularly. Recently, sufficiently sensitive methodology was described to calculate structural strain as a function of missense mutations in AlphaFold-predicted model structures, which was extensively validated on experimental and predicted structural datasets. When paired with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, these tools provide a facile approach to screen mutations in silico. We applied this framework to calculate the structural and dynamic effects of cancer-associated mutations in the chemokine receptor CCR3, a Class A GPCR involved in cancer and autoimmune disorders. Residue-residue contact scoring refined effective strain results, highlighting significant remodeling of inter- and intra-motif contacts along the highly conserved GPCR activation pathway network. We then integrated AlphaFold-derived predicted Local Distance Difference Test scores with per-residue Root Mean Square Fluctuations and activation pathway Contact Analysis (CONAN) from coarse grain MD simulations to identify statistically significant changes in receptor dynamics upon mutation. Finally, analysis of negative control mutants suggests false positive results in AlphaFold pipelines should be considered but can be mitigated with stricter control of statistical analysis. Our results indicate selected mutants influence structural plasticity of CCR3 related to ligand interaction, activation, and G protein coupling, using a framework that could be applicable to a wide range of biochemically relevant protein targets following further validation.
期刊介绍:
Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution.
Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics.
The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication.
Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).