Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly
{"title":"干扰素γ释放试验在癌症患者结核诊断中的应用。","authors":"Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly","doi":"10.1111/tid.14428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Interferon-γ Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Patients With Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Utility of Interferon-γ Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Patients With Cancer.
Background: Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.
Results: A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).
Conclusions: T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.