医师助理导师培训计划的范围检讨:课程与设计。

Erin S Schoenfuss
{"title":"医师助理导师培训计划的范围检讨:课程与设计。","authors":"Erin S Schoenfuss","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preceptors are crucial in the education of physician assistant (PA) students, yet many lack formal preceptor training. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the curriculum and design of existing preceptor training programs for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was developed following the methodologic framework provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search included a review of the electronic databases CINAHL and MEDLINE, a Web search, and an examination of article references. The search encompassed empirical, peer-reviewed studies written in English and published between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1106 sources identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria, representing 31 preceptor training programs. Eighty-four percent of these programs were based in the United States. Fifty curricular topics were identified and organized into 10 domains. Feedback and teaching were addressed in 97% of the programs. Sixteen programs used an online format, which increased each year compared with other formats. Lectures were the most common teaching method. Program length varied. The majority of participants and article authors were physicians, with only 5 programs including PA participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The curricula and design of preceptor training programs varied but were generally well received by participants. There was limited involvement of PAs in both participation and authorship of preceptor training research. This review underscores the benefits of preceptor training while highlighting the need for increased PA engagement in both training and program development.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review of Preceptor Training Programs for Physician Assistants: Curriculum and Design.\",\"authors\":\"Erin S Schoenfuss\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preceptors are crucial in the education of physician assistant (PA) students, yet many lack formal preceptor training. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the curriculum and design of existing preceptor training programs for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was developed following the methodologic framework provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search included a review of the electronic databases CINAHL and MEDLINE, a Web search, and an examination of article references. The search encompassed empirical, peer-reviewed studies written in English and published between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1106 sources identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria, representing 31 preceptor training programs. Eighty-four percent of these programs were based in the United States. Fifty curricular topics were identified and organized into 10 domains. Feedback and teaching were addressed in 97% of the programs. Sixteen programs used an online format, which increased each year compared with other formats. Lectures were the most common teaching method. Program length varied. The majority of participants and article authors were physicians, with only 5 programs including PA participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The curricula and design of preceptor training programs varied but were generally well received by participants. There was limited involvement of PAs in both participation and authorship of preceptor training research. This review underscores the benefits of preceptor training while highlighting the need for increased PA engagement in both training and program development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:辅导员在医师助理(PA)学生的教育中至关重要,但许多人缺乏正式的辅导员培训。本综述的目的是描述现有医师助理、执业护士和内科医生的培训课程和设计。方法:根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所提供的方法学框架,进行范围审查。文献检索包括对电子数据库CINAHL和MEDLINE的回顾、网络检索和文章参考文献的检查。该研究涵盖了2019年1月1日至2024年5月1日期间用英语撰写的经验性同行评议研究。结果:在确定的1106个来源中,32个符合资格标准,代表31个导师培训项目。这些项目中有84%位于美国。确定了50个课程主题并将其组织为10个领域。反馈和教学在97%的项目中得到了解决。16个项目采用了在线形式,与其他形式相比,在线形式每年都在增加。讲课是最常用的教学方法。节目长度各不相同。大多数参与者和文章作者是医生,只有5个项目包括PA参与者。讨论:导师培训项目的课程和设计各不相同,但参与者普遍接受。在导师培训研究的参与和撰写方面,专业人员的参与有限。这篇综述强调了培训导师的好处,同时也强调了在培训和项目开发中增加私人助理参与的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Scoping Review of Preceptor Training Programs for Physician Assistants: Curriculum and Design.

Introduction: Preceptors are crucial in the education of physician assistant (PA) students, yet many lack formal preceptor training. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the curriculum and design of existing preceptor training programs for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.

Methods: This scoping review was developed following the methodologic framework provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search included a review of the electronic databases CINAHL and MEDLINE, a Web search, and an examination of article references. The search encompassed empirical, peer-reviewed studies written in English and published between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024.

Results: Out of 1106 sources identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria, representing 31 preceptor training programs. Eighty-four percent of these programs were based in the United States. Fifty curricular topics were identified and organized into 10 domains. Feedback and teaching were addressed in 97% of the programs. Sixteen programs used an online format, which increased each year compared with other formats. Lectures were the most common teaching method. Program length varied. The majority of participants and article authors were physicians, with only 5 programs including PA participants.

Discussion: The curricula and design of preceptor training programs varied but were generally well received by participants. There was limited involvement of PAs in both participation and authorship of preceptor training research. This review underscores the benefits of preceptor training while highlighting the need for increased PA engagement in both training and program development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
International Physician Assistant Exchange: Facilitating Kinship in Education and Patient Care. Bridging the Gap: Implementing an Adjunct Faculty as a Remediation Specialist in a Physician Assistant/Associate Program. Fragments of Community: Physician Assistant Student Perspectives on Experience of Community With Faculty. Introducing Medical Educators to Interpersonal Theory: Its Application to Emotional Intelligence. Reimagining Physician Assistant Education: Championing Cognitive Diversity to Promote Inclusivity, Neurodiversity Awareness, and a Sense of Belonging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1