Glittre日常生活活动测试在下肢义肢使用者中的效度和信度。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422
Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker
{"title":"Glittre日常生活活动测试在下肢义肢使用者中的效度和信度。","authors":"Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of Glittre activities of daily living test in lower-limb prosthetic users.\",\"authors\":\"Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能能力评估在确定下肢假肢使用者的活动水平方面起着重要作用。目的:我们的目的是调查格里特日常生活活动(ADL)测试在下肢假肢使用者中的信度和效度。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:研究纳入66名年龄在18岁以上,使用下肢义肢至少6个月,能独立行走至少30米的患者。在构念效度方面,对Glittre ADL测验与2分钟步行测验、计时行走测验和功能到达测验进行相关性检验,并进行Bland-Altman一致性分析。评估内信度通过同一物理治疗师在不同日期进行的两次测试来检验,评估间信度通过另一位物理治疗师在不同日期进行的测试来检验。结果:Glittre ADL检验对分级内(类内相关系数= 0.940,95%置信区间= 0.903 ~ 0.963,测量标准误差= 26.03,最小可检出变化= 72.31)的信度较好,对分级间(类内相关系数= 0.890,95%置信区间= 0.806 ~ 0.936,测量标准误差= 36.80,最小可检出变化= 102.06,p < 0.001)的信度较好。Glittre ADL测试与2 min步行测试呈显著负相关(r = -0.785),与起床时间和步行时间呈显著正相关(r = 0.805),与功能到达测试呈显著负相关(r = -0.266, p < 0.05)。Bland-Altman图显示,效度和信度测量值的一致性为95%。结论:Glittre ADL测试是一种有效可靠的测试方法,可用于评估下肢假体使用者的功能能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of Glittre activities of daily living test in lower-limb prosthetic users.

Background: Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Methods: The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.

Results: The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.

Conclusions: The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1