Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker
{"title":"Glittre日常生活活动测试在下肢义肢使用者中的效度和信度。","authors":"Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of Glittre activities of daily living test in lower-limb prosthetic users.\",\"authors\":\"Özge Çiftçi, Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Levent Eker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of Glittre activities of daily living test in lower-limb prosthetic users.
Background: Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.
Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.
Study design: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.
Results: The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.
Conclusions: The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.
期刊介绍:
Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.