固定式全踝关节置换术与活动式全踝关节置换术相比,翻修风险更低:荷兰1246例患者的登记评估。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004
Marije C Vink, Liza N van Steenbergen, Bas de Hartog, Wierd P Zijlstra, Tom M van Raaij, Rinne M Peters
{"title":"固定式全踝关节置换术与活动式全踝关节置换术相比,翻修风险更低:荷兰1246例患者的登记评估。","authors":"Marije C Vink, Liza N van Steenbergen, Bas de Hartog, Wierd P Zijlstra, Tom M van Raaij, Rinne M Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been developed as treatment for disabling tibiotalar osteoarthritis. TAAs are divided into mobile- and fixed-bearings. The aim was to determine the incidence and trends of fixed- and mobile bearings over time and investigate the association of bearing type and risk of revision after primary TAA in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) (2014-2023), we analyzed trends in use of bearing type, reasons for revision and implant survival (n = 1246).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fixed bearings were more often used than mobile bearings (67 % versus 33 %). Revision risk at 3, 5 and 7 years was respectively 2.8 %, 3.3 %, and 5.4 % for fixed bearings, versus 6.5 %, 10.4 %, and 11.3 % for mobile bearings. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.5 (95 %CI 1.4-4.4) for mobile bearings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fixed bearings were associated with a lower revision risk than mobile bearings in total ankle arthroplasties based on Dutch registry data.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower risk of revision in fixed-bearing compared to mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasties: A register based evaluation of 1246 patients in the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Marije C Vink, Liza N van Steenbergen, Bas de Hartog, Wierd P Zijlstra, Tom M van Raaij, Rinne M Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been developed as treatment for disabling tibiotalar osteoarthritis. TAAs are divided into mobile- and fixed-bearings. The aim was to determine the incidence and trends of fixed- and mobile bearings over time and investigate the association of bearing type and risk of revision after primary TAA in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) (2014-2023), we analyzed trends in use of bearing type, reasons for revision and implant survival (n = 1246).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fixed bearings were more often used than mobile bearings (67 % versus 33 %). Revision risk at 3, 5 and 7 years was respectively 2.8 %, 3.3 %, and 5.4 % for fixed bearings, versus 6.5 %, 10.4 %, and 11.3 % for mobile bearings. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.5 (95 %CI 1.4-4.4) for mobile bearings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fixed bearings were associated with a lower revision risk than mobile bearings in total ankle arthroplasties based on Dutch registry data.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全踝关节置换术(TAA)已发展成为治疗致残性胫跖骨关节炎。taa分为移动和固定轴承。目的是确定固定和移动轴承的发病率和趋势随着时间的推移,并调查轴承类型与荷兰原发性TAA后翻修风险的关系。方法:使用荷兰关节置换术登记(LROI)(2014-2023)的数据,我们分析了使用轴承类型、翻修原因和种植体存活的趋势( = 1246)。结果:固定轴承比移动轴承更常使用(67 %对33 %)。固定轴承3年、5年和7年的修正风险分别为2.8 %、3.3 %和5.4 %,而移动轴承的修正风险分别为6.5 %、10.4 %和11.3 %。移动轴承调整后的风险比为2.5(95 %CI 1.4-4.4)。结论:根据荷兰注册数据,在全踝关节置换术中,固定轴承的翻修风险低于活动轴承。证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower risk of revision in fixed-bearing compared to mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasties: A register based evaluation of 1246 patients in the Netherlands.

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been developed as treatment for disabling tibiotalar osteoarthritis. TAAs are divided into mobile- and fixed-bearings. The aim was to determine the incidence and trends of fixed- and mobile bearings over time and investigate the association of bearing type and risk of revision after primary TAA in the Netherlands.

Methods: Using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) (2014-2023), we analyzed trends in use of bearing type, reasons for revision and implant survival (n = 1246).

Results: Fixed bearings were more often used than mobile bearings (67 % versus 33 %). Revision risk at 3, 5 and 7 years was respectively 2.8 %, 3.3 %, and 5.4 % for fixed bearings, versus 6.5 %, 10.4 %, and 11.3 % for mobile bearings. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.5 (95 %CI 1.4-4.4) for mobile bearings.

Conclusion: Fixed bearings were associated with a lower revision risk than mobile bearings in total ankle arthroplasties based on Dutch registry data.

Level of evidence: II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Defining normative side-to-side differences in the distal tibiofibular joint of healthy individuals using weight-bearing CT 3D image analysis. Outcome measures after foot and ankle surgery: A Systematic Review. Assessing the medial distal tibial angle based on a long ankle view radiograph - Reliability of and differences between three approaches. Minimally invasive surgical techniques compared to an extensile lateral approach in the management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis plus peripheral blood concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions of the ankle as part of a complex surgical approach - 7-year follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1