心肌梗死后心脏控制的计算机模型应用于计算机患者队列。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1113/JP287596
Michelle M Gee, Abraham M Lenhoff, James S Schwaber, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli
{"title":"心肌梗死后心脏控制的计算机模型应用于计算机患者队列。","authors":"Michelle M Gee, Abraham M Lenhoff, James S Schwaber, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli","doi":"10.1113/JP287596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loss of cardiac physiological function following myocardial infarction (MI) is accompanied by neural adaptations in the baroreflex that are compensatory in the short term, but then become associated with long-term disease progression. One marker of these adaptations is decreased baroreflex sensitivity, a strong predictor of post-MI mortality. The relative contributions of cardiac remodelling and neural adaptation in the sensory, central brainstem and peripheral ganglionic loci to baroreflex sensitivity changes remain underexplored. We used a computational model-based approach that accounts for the short-term dynamics of closed-loop human cardiac control to integrate disparate experimental studies on neural adaptation following MI into a unified quantitative framework. We developed an ensemble of 59 distinct model parameterizations that account for the clinically observed heterogeneity of cardiac control in healthy individuals. We simulated an in silico cohort of 35,400 patients with MI, corresponding to six scenarios of one or more loci of neural adaptation coupled with cardiac remodelling. We evaluated the range of MI-induced shifts in arterial pressure, heart rate and baroreflex curve responses. Our results show that adaptation in any single neural locus coupled with cardiac remodelling is sufficient to account for the MI-induced haemodynamic and autonomic changes observed experimentally. Of the adaptation pathways, we found that individuals with central or peripheral vagal efferent adaptation and preserved baroreceptor gain could maintain high baroreflex sensitivity after ischaemic injury. These results suggest that there are a multitude of adaptive pathways for tuning the baroreflex circuit to shift cardiac control physiology, potentially explaining patient heterogeneity post-MI. KEY POINTS: Baroreflex sensitivity is a strong indicator of post-myocardial ischaemia survival and is variable among individuals. We fine-tuned a computational model ensemble based on physiological observations to develop an in silico patient cohort consistent with the range of baroreflex responses observed experimentally. Simulation and analysis of the in silico cohort show that individuals with a functional afferent pathway and the ability to adapt along the vagal efferent pathway can maintain baroreflex sensitivity post-cardiac ischaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational modelling of cardiac control following myocardial infarction using an in silico patient cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle M Gee, Abraham M Lenhoff, James S Schwaber, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP287596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Loss of cardiac physiological function following myocardial infarction (MI) is accompanied by neural adaptations in the baroreflex that are compensatory in the short term, but then become associated with long-term disease progression. One marker of these adaptations is decreased baroreflex sensitivity, a strong predictor of post-MI mortality. The relative contributions of cardiac remodelling and neural adaptation in the sensory, central brainstem and peripheral ganglionic loci to baroreflex sensitivity changes remain underexplored. We used a computational model-based approach that accounts for the short-term dynamics of closed-loop human cardiac control to integrate disparate experimental studies on neural adaptation following MI into a unified quantitative framework. We developed an ensemble of 59 distinct model parameterizations that account for the clinically observed heterogeneity of cardiac control in healthy individuals. We simulated an in silico cohort of 35,400 patients with MI, corresponding to six scenarios of one or more loci of neural adaptation coupled with cardiac remodelling. We evaluated the range of MI-induced shifts in arterial pressure, heart rate and baroreflex curve responses. Our results show that adaptation in any single neural locus coupled with cardiac remodelling is sufficient to account for the MI-induced haemodynamic and autonomic changes observed experimentally. Of the adaptation pathways, we found that individuals with central or peripheral vagal efferent adaptation and preserved baroreceptor gain could maintain high baroreflex sensitivity after ischaemic injury. These results suggest that there are a multitude of adaptive pathways for tuning the baroreflex circuit to shift cardiac control physiology, potentially explaining patient heterogeneity post-MI. KEY POINTS: Baroreflex sensitivity is a strong indicator of post-myocardial ischaemia survival and is variable among individuals. We fine-tuned a computational model ensemble based on physiological observations to develop an in silico patient cohort consistent with the range of baroreflex responses observed experimentally. Simulation and analysis of the in silico cohort show that individuals with a functional afferent pathway and the ability to adapt along the vagal efferent pathway can maintain baroreflex sensitivity post-cardiac ischaemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287596\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心肌梗死(MI)后心脏生理功能的丧失伴随着压力反射的神经适应,这种适应在短期内具有代偿性,但随后与长期疾病进展相关。这些适应的一个标志是气压反射敏感性降低,这是心肌梗死后死亡率的一个强有力的预测指标。感觉、中枢脑干和外周神经节位点的心脏重构和神经适应对压力反射敏感性变化的相对贡献仍未得到充分探讨。我们使用了一种基于计算模型的方法,该方法考虑了人类闭环心脏控制的短期动态,将心肌梗死后神经适应的不同实验研究整合到一个统一的定量框架中。我们开发了59个不同模型参数化的集合,这些参数化解释了临床观察到的健康个体心脏控制的异质性。我们模拟了35,400例心肌梗死患者的计算机队列,对应于一个或多个神经适应位点与心脏重构相结合的六种情况。我们评估了心肌梗死引起的动脉压、心率和压力反射曲线反应的变化范围。我们的研究结果表明,任何单一神经位点的适应性加上心脏重构都足以解释实验观察到的心肌梗死诱导的血流动力学和自主神经变化。在适应途径中,我们发现具有中枢或外周迷走神经传出适应和保留压力受体增益的个体可以在缺血损伤后保持高的压力反射敏感性。这些结果表明,调节压反射回路以改变心脏控制生理学存在多种适应性途径,这可能解释心肌梗死后患者的异质性。重点:压力反射敏感性是心肌缺血后生存的一个重要指标,在个体之间是可变的。我们对基于生理观察的计算模型集合进行了微调,以建立与实验观察到的压力反射反应范围一致的计算机患者队列。计算机队列的模拟和分析表明,具有功能性传入通路和沿迷走神经传出通路适应能力的个体可以在心肌缺血后维持压力反射敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computational modelling of cardiac control following myocardial infarction using an in silico patient cohort.

Loss of cardiac physiological function following myocardial infarction (MI) is accompanied by neural adaptations in the baroreflex that are compensatory in the short term, but then become associated with long-term disease progression. One marker of these adaptations is decreased baroreflex sensitivity, a strong predictor of post-MI mortality. The relative contributions of cardiac remodelling and neural adaptation in the sensory, central brainstem and peripheral ganglionic loci to baroreflex sensitivity changes remain underexplored. We used a computational model-based approach that accounts for the short-term dynamics of closed-loop human cardiac control to integrate disparate experimental studies on neural adaptation following MI into a unified quantitative framework. We developed an ensemble of 59 distinct model parameterizations that account for the clinically observed heterogeneity of cardiac control in healthy individuals. We simulated an in silico cohort of 35,400 patients with MI, corresponding to six scenarios of one or more loci of neural adaptation coupled with cardiac remodelling. We evaluated the range of MI-induced shifts in arterial pressure, heart rate and baroreflex curve responses. Our results show that adaptation in any single neural locus coupled with cardiac remodelling is sufficient to account for the MI-induced haemodynamic and autonomic changes observed experimentally. Of the adaptation pathways, we found that individuals with central or peripheral vagal efferent adaptation and preserved baroreceptor gain could maintain high baroreflex sensitivity after ischaemic injury. These results suggest that there are a multitude of adaptive pathways for tuning the baroreflex circuit to shift cardiac control physiology, potentially explaining patient heterogeneity post-MI. KEY POINTS: Baroreflex sensitivity is a strong indicator of post-myocardial ischaemia survival and is variable among individuals. We fine-tuned a computational model ensemble based on physiological observations to develop an in silico patient cohort consistent with the range of baroreflex responses observed experimentally. Simulation and analysis of the in silico cohort show that individuals with a functional afferent pathway and the ability to adapt along the vagal efferent pathway can maintain baroreflex sensitivity post-cardiac ischaemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
期刊最新文献
Synaptic loss in motor neurons precipitates age-related dysphagia: Middle agers gotta keep in touch! A first morphological and electrophysiological characterization of Fañanas cells of the mouse cerebellum. Dendritic alterations precede age-related dysphagia and nucleus ambiguus motor neuron death. Placental mitochondrial metabolic adaptation maintains cellular energy balance in pregnancy complicated by gestational hypoxia. Multinucleation as a buffer against gene expression noise in syncytial myofibres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1