印度职业母亲纯母乳喂养做法的十年趋势:一项多层次分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Breastfeeding Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1186/s13006-024-00695-0
Ramnika Aggarwal, Priyanka Garg, Madhur Verma, Priya Bindal, Aditi Aditi, Inderdeep Kaur, Minakshi Rohilla, Rakesh Kakkar
{"title":"印度职业母亲纯母乳喂养做法的十年趋势:一项多层次分析。","authors":"Ramnika Aggarwal, Priyanka Garg, Madhur Verma, Priya Bindal, Aditi Aditi, Inderdeep Kaur, Minakshi Rohilla, Rakesh Kakkar","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00695-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is defined as feeding infants only breast milk of the mother or a wet nurse for the first six months, without additional food or liquids except the oral rehydration solution or drops/syrups of vitamins, minerals or medicines. The working status of women in developed countries adversely affects the EBF rates, which calls for an assessment in rapidly developing countries like India. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of EBF using the data from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS 3, 4, 5) conducted between 2005 and 06, 2015-16 and 2019-21 to estimate the likelihood EBF according to mothers' employment status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional surveys. Exclusive breastfeeding was the primary dependent variable and defined as the percentage of youngest children under six months exclusively breastfed per last 24 h. The employment status of the mother was the primary independent variable and was coded dichotomously (yes/no). Chi-square analysis assessed the association of EBF with the outcome variable of interest. A multi-level modelling approach has been used for portioning variation in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at different geographical levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From NFHS rounds 3 to 5, the overall prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 47.45%, 54.85%, and 64.01% respectively. On segregating the women as per their employment status, the prevalence among employed women was 51.1%, 51.1%, and 60.3%, while in unemployed women the prevalence was 45.9%, 54.8%, and 67.3% respectively. The odds of practising EBF in NFHS-5 doubled since NFHS-3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 2; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.08, 3.67). Employed mothers had a significantly lower odds ratio (0.94, 0.91, 0.98) of practising exclusive breastfeeding. The likelihood increased when mothers were exposed to media, had normal BMI, and visited health centres > 4 times during pregnancy. The likelihood decreased in older mothers, birth of infant in a health facility, female gender of the child, and late initiation of breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lower prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among working mothers calls for an urgent need to improve policies around maternity benefits at workplaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decadal trends in the exclusive breastfeeding practices among working Indian mothers: a multi-level analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ramnika Aggarwal, Priyanka Garg, Madhur Verma, Priya Bindal, Aditi Aditi, Inderdeep Kaur, Minakshi Rohilla, Rakesh Kakkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13006-024-00695-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is defined as feeding infants only breast milk of the mother or a wet nurse for the first six months, without additional food or liquids except the oral rehydration solution or drops/syrups of vitamins, minerals or medicines. The working status of women in developed countries adversely affects the EBF rates, which calls for an assessment in rapidly developing countries like India. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of EBF using the data from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS 3, 4, 5) conducted between 2005 and 06, 2015-16 and 2019-21 to estimate the likelihood EBF according to mothers' employment status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional surveys. Exclusive breastfeeding was the primary dependent variable and defined as the percentage of youngest children under six months exclusively breastfed per last 24 h. The employment status of the mother was the primary independent variable and was coded dichotomously (yes/no). Chi-square analysis assessed the association of EBF with the outcome variable of interest. A multi-level modelling approach has been used for portioning variation in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at different geographical levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From NFHS rounds 3 to 5, the overall prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 47.45%, 54.85%, and 64.01% respectively. On segregating the women as per their employment status, the prevalence among employed women was 51.1%, 51.1%, and 60.3%, while in unemployed women the prevalence was 45.9%, 54.8%, and 67.3% respectively. The odds of practising EBF in NFHS-5 doubled since NFHS-3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 2; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.08, 3.67). Employed mothers had a significantly lower odds ratio (0.94, 0.91, 0.98) of practising exclusive breastfeeding. The likelihood increased when mothers were exposed to media, had normal BMI, and visited health centres > 4 times during pregnancy. The likelihood decreased in older mothers, birth of infant in a health facility, female gender of the child, and late initiation of breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lower prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among working mothers calls for an urgent need to improve policies around maternity benefits at workplaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Breastfeeding Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681637/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Breastfeeding Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00695-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00695-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:纯母乳喂养(EBF)被定义为在头六个月只给婴儿喂食母亲或奶妈的母乳,除了口服补液或维生素、矿物质或药物滴剂/糖浆外,没有其他食物或液体。发达国家妇女的工作地位对EBF比率有不利影响,这需要在印度等快速发展的国家进行评估。因此,本研究的主要目的是利用2005 - 06年、2015-16年和2019-21年期间进行的国家家庭健康调查(NFHS 3、4、5)的数据确定EBF的患病率,根据母亲的就业状况估计EBF的可能性。方法:对横断面调查进行二次资料分析。纯母乳喂养是主要的因变量,定义为过去24小时内纯母乳喂养的六个月以下最小儿童的百分比。母亲的就业状况是主要的自变量,并被编码为二分类(是/否)。卡方分析评估EBF与目标结果变量的相关性。采用多层次建模方法对不同地理水平上纯母乳喂养流行率的分配差异进行了研究。结果:国家儿童健康调查第3 ~ 5轮,全母乳喂养的总体患病率分别为47.45%、54.85%和64.01%。在按就业状况对妇女进行分类时,就业妇女的患病率分别为51.1%、51.1%和60.3%,而失业妇女的患病率分别为45.9%、54.8%和67.3%。自NFHS-3以来,NFHS-5中实施EBF的几率增加了一倍(调整优势比:2;95%置信区间:1.08,3.67)。职业母亲实行纯母乳喂养的优势比(0.94,0.91,0.98)明显较低。当母亲在怀孕期间接触媒体、身体质量指数正常、去健康中心4次时,这种可能性会增加。年龄较大的母亲、在卫生机构出生的婴儿、孩子的性别是女性以及开始母乳喂养较晚的可能性降低。结论:职业母亲纯母乳喂养率较低,迫切需要改善工作场所的产假福利政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decadal trends in the exclusive breastfeeding practices among working Indian mothers: a multi-level analysis.

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is defined as feeding infants only breast milk of the mother or a wet nurse for the first six months, without additional food or liquids except the oral rehydration solution or drops/syrups of vitamins, minerals or medicines. The working status of women in developed countries adversely affects the EBF rates, which calls for an assessment in rapidly developing countries like India. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of EBF using the data from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS 3, 4, 5) conducted between 2005 and 06, 2015-16 and 2019-21 to estimate the likelihood EBF according to mothers' employment status.

Methods: We did a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional surveys. Exclusive breastfeeding was the primary dependent variable and defined as the percentage of youngest children under six months exclusively breastfed per last 24 h. The employment status of the mother was the primary independent variable and was coded dichotomously (yes/no). Chi-square analysis assessed the association of EBF with the outcome variable of interest. A multi-level modelling approach has been used for portioning variation in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at different geographical levels.

Results: From NFHS rounds 3 to 5, the overall prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 47.45%, 54.85%, and 64.01% respectively. On segregating the women as per their employment status, the prevalence among employed women was 51.1%, 51.1%, and 60.3%, while in unemployed women the prevalence was 45.9%, 54.8%, and 67.3% respectively. The odds of practising EBF in NFHS-5 doubled since NFHS-3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 2; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.08, 3.67). Employed mothers had a significantly lower odds ratio (0.94, 0.91, 0.98) of practising exclusive breastfeeding. The likelihood increased when mothers were exposed to media, had normal BMI, and visited health centres > 4 times during pregnancy. The likelihood decreased in older mothers, birth of infant in a health facility, female gender of the child, and late initiation of breastfeeding.

Conclusions: The lower prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among working mothers calls for an urgent need to improve policies around maternity benefits at workplaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: Infant and young child feeding practice status and its determinants in UAE: results from the MISC cohort. Breastfeeding with primary low milk supply: a phenomenological exploration of mothers' lived experiences of postnatal breastfeeding support. Infant and young child feeding practice status and its determinants in UAE: results from the MISC cohort. A randomized controlled, trial on effects of mobile phone text messaging in combination with motivational interviewing versus standard infant feeding counselling on breastfeeding and child health outcomes, among women living with HIV. Barriers and drivers to exclusive breastfeeding in Kyrgyzstan: a qualitative study with mothers and health workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1