“我仍然能感觉到恶心”:美沙酮维持治疗患者的戒断经历。

David Frank, Alex S Bennett, Charles M Cleland, Beth E Meyerson, Danielle M Russell, Suzan M Walters, Caty Simon, Joy D Scheidell, Luther Elliott
{"title":"“我仍然能感觉到恶心”:美沙酮维持治疗患者的戒断经历。","authors":"David Frank, Alex S Bennett, Charles M Cleland, Beth E Meyerson, Danielle M Russell, Suzan M Walters, Caty Simon, Joy D Scheidell, Luther Elliott","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioid withdrawal is a regular occurrence for many people who use illicit opioids (PWUIO) involving acute physical and psychological pain. Yet, there is very little data on the withdrawal experience of people in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and almost none from the patients' experience. Learning more about patients' withdrawal experiences can help to inform policies and practices that are better suited to address withdrawal and may improve patient satisfaction as well as uptake and retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article is based on 29 semi-structured interviews with people who use illicit opioids who reported recent withdrawal experience. The study conducted interviews remotely via Zoom between April and August 2022 and later transcribed them professionally. The study team then coded data thematically using Atlas.ti, based on a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies and informed by the literature and study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described withdrawal as a significant issue that negatively impacts their treatment experience and increases the likelihood of treatment cessation. Their accounts of withdrawal were complex and often involved multiple factors; however, feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours were seen as important vectors that led to their withdrawal experiences. Importantly, participants framed feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours as institutional problems, resulting primarily from clinic policies, practices, and culture rather than from patients' decisions or individual behavior. Specifically, they cited restricted access to take-home doses, limited hours of operation, and a punitive focus on complete abstinence as factors that made withdrawal difficult to avoid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' accounts demonstrate a disconnect between providers' focus on promoting complete abstinence and patients, who were often using MMT for more pragmatic reasons that did not include complete abstinence from all drugs. These findings support growing calls for the integration of MMT into the mainstream healthcare system by making it available via prescription from office-based medical settings and dispensed through pharmacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":" ","pages":"209616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I still can feel the sickness\\\": Withdrawal experiences of people on methadone maintenance treatment.\",\"authors\":\"David Frank, Alex S Bennett, Charles M Cleland, Beth E Meyerson, Danielle M Russell, Suzan M Walters, Caty Simon, Joy D Scheidell, Luther Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioid withdrawal is a regular occurrence for many people who use illicit opioids (PWUIO) involving acute physical and psychological pain. Yet, there is very little data on the withdrawal experience of people in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and almost none from the patients' experience. Learning more about patients' withdrawal experiences can help to inform policies and practices that are better suited to address withdrawal and may improve patient satisfaction as well as uptake and retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article is based on 29 semi-structured interviews with people who use illicit opioids who reported recent withdrawal experience. The study conducted interviews remotely via Zoom between April and August 2022 and later transcribed them professionally. The study team then coded data thematically using Atlas.ti, based on a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies and informed by the literature and study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described withdrawal as a significant issue that negatively impacts their treatment experience and increases the likelihood of treatment cessation. Their accounts of withdrawal were complex and often involved multiple factors; however, feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours were seen as important vectors that led to their withdrawal experiences. Importantly, participants framed feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours as institutional problems, resulting primarily from clinic policies, practices, and culture rather than from patients' decisions or individual behavior. Specifically, they cited restricted access to take-home doses, limited hours of operation, and a punitive focus on complete abstinence as factors that made withdrawal difficult to avoid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' accounts demonstrate a disconnect between providers' focus on promoting complete abstinence and patients, who were often using MMT for more pragmatic reasons that did not include complete abstinence from all drugs. These findings support growing calls for the integration of MMT into the mainstream healthcare system by making it available via prescription from office-based medical settings and dispensed through pharmacies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"209616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物戒断是许多使用非法阿片类药物(PWUIO)的人经常发生的情况,涉及急性身体和心理疼痛。然而,关于美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)患者停药经历的数据很少,几乎没有来自患者经历的数据。更多地了解患者的戒断经历可以帮助制定更适合解决戒断问题的政策和做法,并可能提高患者满意度以及吸收和保留。方法:本文基于29个半结构化访谈,访谈对象是使用非法阿片类药物的人,他们报告了最近的戒断经历。该研究在2022年4月至8月期间通过Zoom进行了远程采访,随后进行了专业转录。然后,研究小组使用Atlas对数据进行主题编码。Ti,基于归纳和演绎编码策略的结合,并根据文献和研究目的。结果:参与者将停药描述为对其治疗体验产生负面影响的重要问题,并增加了停止治疗的可能性。他们对戒毒的描述很复杂,往往涉及多种因素;然而,感觉剂量不足和错过诊所给药时间被视为导致他们戒断经历的重要载体。重要的是,参与者将感觉剂量不足和错过诊所给药时间视为制度问题,主要是由诊所政策、实践和文化造成的,而不是患者的决定或个人行为。具体来说,他们指出,限制获得带回家的剂量,限制手术时间,以及对完全戒断的惩罚性关注是导致戒断难以避免的因素。结论:患者的叙述表明了提供者对促进完全戒断的关注与患者之间的脱节,患者通常出于更务实的原因使用MMT,而不包括完全戒断所有药物。这些发现支持了将MMT纳入主流医疗保健系统的呼声,使其通过办公室医疗机构的处方和药房分发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"I still can feel the sickness": Withdrawal experiences of people on methadone maintenance treatment.

Introduction: Opioid withdrawal is a regular occurrence for many people who use illicit opioids (PWUIO) involving acute physical and psychological pain. Yet, there is very little data on the withdrawal experience of people in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and almost none from the patients' experience. Learning more about patients' withdrawal experiences can help to inform policies and practices that are better suited to address withdrawal and may improve patient satisfaction as well as uptake and retention.

Methods: This article is based on 29 semi-structured interviews with people who use illicit opioids who reported recent withdrawal experience. The study conducted interviews remotely via Zoom between April and August 2022 and later transcribed them professionally. The study team then coded data thematically using Atlas.ti, based on a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies and informed by the literature and study aims.

Results: Participants described withdrawal as a significant issue that negatively impacts their treatment experience and increases the likelihood of treatment cessation. Their accounts of withdrawal were complex and often involved multiple factors; however, feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours were seen as important vectors that led to their withdrawal experiences. Importantly, participants framed feeling underdosed and missing clinic dosing hours as institutional problems, resulting primarily from clinic policies, practices, and culture rather than from patients' decisions or individual behavior. Specifically, they cited restricted access to take-home doses, limited hours of operation, and a punitive focus on complete abstinence as factors that made withdrawal difficult to avoid.

Conclusions: Patients' accounts demonstrate a disconnect between providers' focus on promoting complete abstinence and patients, who were often using MMT for more pragmatic reasons that did not include complete abstinence from all drugs. These findings support growing calls for the integration of MMT into the mainstream healthcare system by making it available via prescription from office-based medical settings and dispensed through pharmacies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study exploring the feasibility and acceptability of embedding an overdose prevention sites in a U.S. hospital. The first five years of implementing Missouri's medication first approach to opioid use disorder treatment: Plateaus, regressions, and underbellies of progress. Implementation science in higher education: Identifying key determinants in the selection of evidence-based alcohol and substance prevention and treatment. Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1