Italo B G de Lima, Priscila J R Cruz, Lucas P C Borges, Mateus P Gionbelli, Marcio M Ladeira, Daniel W Shike, Daniel R Casagrande, Thiago F Bernardes
{"title":"放牧条件下作为肥育肉牛纤维源的矿渣对残渣特性、牛行为性能和胴体性状的影响","authors":"Italo B G de Lima, Priscila J R Cruz, Lucas P C Borges, Mateus P Gionbelli, Marcio M Ladeira, Daniel W Shike, Daniel R Casagrande, Thiago F Bernardes","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The snaplage residue presents itself as a potential alternative roughage source in finishing systems, owing to its high fiber concentration which aids in maintaining rumen health. Nevertheless, the performance of animals will hinge on both the allowance and the nutritive value it offers. This study aimed to evaluate different stocking rates of heifers grazing snaplage residue as an exclusive source of fiber on finishing phase performance. The treatments included two stocking rates (SR): i) low stocking rate (LS; 3.5 AU/ha) and ii) high stocking rate (HS; 7.0 AU/ha), which were obtained by modifying the size of the paddocks. Crossbred beef heifers (<i>n</i> = 48; initial body weight = 276 ± 23 kg) were assigned to 16 paddocks (3 heifers/paddock). The concentrate (87% of corn, 3.5% of soybean meal, 3.9% of cottonseed meal, 1.2% of urea, and 4% of mineral; DM basis) was fed ad libitum daily at 0600 hours. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. There was no SR × time effect (<i>P</i> = 0.88) on residue mass. There was less (<i>P</i> < 0.01) total residue mass for HS than LS, and total mass decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) over time. There was no SR × time effect (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.16) for behavior characteristics. There was no difference between HS and LS for average residue intake (<i>P</i> = 0.34; 0.44 vs 0.48 kg/d, respectively), concentrate intake (<i>P</i> = 0.84; 7.72 vs 7.78 kg/d, respectively), and daily gain (ADG; <i>P</i> = 0.94; 0.95 vs 0.95 kg/d, respectively), The HS treatment increased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) gain per area (618 vs 309 kg/ha) compared to LS. No differences between SR were observed for carcass characteristics (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.12<i>).</i> The meat's chemical composition was not different (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.37) between treatments. Overall, the snaplage residue stocking rate did not affect the finishing phase performance of beef heifers, but the greater stocking rate (7.0 AU/ha) increased gain per land area.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"8 ","pages":"txae173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snaplage residue as a fiber source for finishing beef cattle under grazing: effects on residue characteristics, cattle behavior and performance, and carcass traits.\",\"authors\":\"Italo B G de Lima, Priscila J R Cruz, Lucas P C Borges, Mateus P Gionbelli, Marcio M Ladeira, Daniel W Shike, Daniel R Casagrande, Thiago F Bernardes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The snaplage residue presents itself as a potential alternative roughage source in finishing systems, owing to its high fiber concentration which aids in maintaining rumen health. Nevertheless, the performance of animals will hinge on both the allowance and the nutritive value it offers. This study aimed to evaluate different stocking rates of heifers grazing snaplage residue as an exclusive source of fiber on finishing phase performance. The treatments included two stocking rates (SR): i) low stocking rate (LS; 3.5 AU/ha) and ii) high stocking rate (HS; 7.0 AU/ha), which were obtained by modifying the size of the paddocks. Crossbred beef heifers (<i>n</i> = 48; initial body weight = 276 ± 23 kg) were assigned to 16 paddocks (3 heifers/paddock). The concentrate (87% of corn, 3.5% of soybean meal, 3.9% of cottonseed meal, 1.2% of urea, and 4% of mineral; DM basis) was fed ad libitum daily at 0600 hours. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. There was no SR × time effect (<i>P</i> = 0.88) on residue mass. There was less (<i>P</i> < 0.01) total residue mass for HS than LS, and total mass decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) over time. There was no SR × time effect (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.16) for behavior characteristics. There was no difference between HS and LS for average residue intake (<i>P</i> = 0.34; 0.44 vs 0.48 kg/d, respectively), concentrate intake (<i>P</i> = 0.84; 7.72 vs 7.78 kg/d, respectively), and daily gain (ADG; <i>P</i> = 0.94; 0.95 vs 0.95 kg/d, respectively), The HS treatment increased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) gain per area (618 vs 309 kg/ha) compared to LS. No differences between SR were observed for carcass characteristics (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.12<i>).</i> The meat's chemical composition was not different (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.37) between treatments. Overall, the snaplage residue stocking rate did not affect the finishing phase performance of beef heifers, but the greater stocking rate (7.0 AU/ha) increased gain per land area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"txae173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于其高纤维含量,有助于维持瘤胃健康,因此在肥育系统中,其渣作为一种潜在的替代粗饲料来源。然而,动物的表现将取决于它所提供的允许量和营养价值。本研究旨在评价不同载畜率下以秸秆为唯一纤维来源的犊牛育肥期生产性能的影响。两种载畜率处理:(1)低载畜率(LS);3.5 AU/ha)和ii)高放养率(HS;7.0 AU/ha),通过改变围场的大小获得。杂交肉牛(n = 48;初始体重= 276±23 kg的母牛被分配到16个围场(3头母牛/围场)。浓缩物(玉米87%,豆粕3.5%,棉籽粕3.9%,尿素1.2%,矿物质4%);每日0600时自由饲喂。数据分析采用SAS的MIXED程序。残留质量无SR ×时间效应(P = 0.88)。行为特征差异有统计学意义(P P P≥0.16)。HS和LS的平均采食量无显著差异(P = 0.34;0.44 vs 0.48 kg/d),精料采食量(P = 0.84;分别为7.72和7.78 kg/d),日增重(ADG;p = 0.94;0.95 vs 0.95 kg/d), HS处理显著增加(P < 0.12)。肉质化学成分在不同处理间无显著差异(P≥0.37)。总体而言,秸秆载畜率对肉牛育肥期生产性能无显著影响,但载畜率越高(7.0 AU/ha),单位土地面积增重越高。
Snaplage residue as a fiber source for finishing beef cattle under grazing: effects on residue characteristics, cattle behavior and performance, and carcass traits.
The snaplage residue presents itself as a potential alternative roughage source in finishing systems, owing to its high fiber concentration which aids in maintaining rumen health. Nevertheless, the performance of animals will hinge on both the allowance and the nutritive value it offers. This study aimed to evaluate different stocking rates of heifers grazing snaplage residue as an exclusive source of fiber on finishing phase performance. The treatments included two stocking rates (SR): i) low stocking rate (LS; 3.5 AU/ha) and ii) high stocking rate (HS; 7.0 AU/ha), which were obtained by modifying the size of the paddocks. Crossbred beef heifers (n = 48; initial body weight = 276 ± 23 kg) were assigned to 16 paddocks (3 heifers/paddock). The concentrate (87% of corn, 3.5% of soybean meal, 3.9% of cottonseed meal, 1.2% of urea, and 4% of mineral; DM basis) was fed ad libitum daily at 0600 hours. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. There was no SR × time effect (P = 0.88) on residue mass. There was less (P < 0.01) total residue mass for HS than LS, and total mass decreased (P < 0.01) over time. There was no SR × time effect (P ≥ 0.16) for behavior characteristics. There was no difference between HS and LS for average residue intake (P = 0.34; 0.44 vs 0.48 kg/d, respectively), concentrate intake (P = 0.84; 7.72 vs 7.78 kg/d, respectively), and daily gain (ADG; P = 0.94; 0.95 vs 0.95 kg/d, respectively), The HS treatment increased (P < 0.01) gain per area (618 vs 309 kg/ha) compared to LS. No differences between SR were observed for carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.12). The meat's chemical composition was not different (P ≥ 0.37) between treatments. Overall, the snaplage residue stocking rate did not affect the finishing phase performance of beef heifers, but the greater stocking rate (7.0 AU/ha) increased gain per land area.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.