咽酸反流发作与质子泵抑制剂治疗有效性之间的联系。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162
Yen-Yang Chen, Chen-Chi Wang, Chun-Yi Chuang, Yung-An Tsou, Yen-Chun Peng, Chi-Sen Chang, Han-Chung Lien
{"title":"咽酸反流发作与质子泵抑制剂治疗有效性之间的联系。","authors":"Yen-Yang Chen, Chen-Chi Wang, Chun-Yi Chuang, Yung-An Tsou, Yen-Chun Peng, Chi-Sen Chang, Han-Chung Lien","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, <i>n</i> = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, <i>n</i> = 68), both pH (+) (56%, <i>n</i> = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, <i>n</i> = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.008), 4.2-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"30 48","pages":"5162-5173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Link between pharyngeal acid reflux episodes and the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Yang Chen, Chen-Chi Wang, Chun-Yi Chuang, Yung-An Tsou, Yen-Chun Peng, Chi-Sen Chang, Han-Chung Lien\",\"doi\":\"10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, <i>n</i> = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, <i>n</i> = 68), both pH (+) (56%, <i>n</i> = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, <i>n</i> = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.008), 4.2-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"30 48\",\"pages\":\"5162-5173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断喉咽反流(LPR)是具有挑战性的,由于重叠的症状。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)通常被处方,但其反应性的可靠预测因素尚不清楚。双氢电位(pH)传感器和多通道腔内阻抗-pH (MII-pH)等回流监测技术可以提高诊断。研究表明,以≥2次咽酸反流(PAR)发作和/或过度食管酸反流(EAR)定义的复合pH参数可预测PPI的疗效。PAR发作的标准是食管酸化过程中30秒内咽部pH值下降≥2个单位至< 5,显示出很强的观察者间可靠性。我们假设PAR发作本身也可以预测PPI反应性。目的:探讨单独PAR发作是否能预测对PPI治疗的积极反应。方法:前瞻性地从台湾三所三级耳鼻喉科门诊招募疑似LPR的患者。在停药期间,他们使用3-pH传感器或下咽MII-pH导管进行了24小时的食管咽pH测试,随后进行了为期12周的埃索美拉唑疗程(40 mg,每日两次)。参与者根据pH结果分为四组:单独的PAR,单独的EAR,两个pH(+)和两个pH(-)。主要结局是原发性喉部症状减少≥50%,观察者对组分配不透明。结果:共纳入522例患者(平均年龄52.3±12.8岁,男性占54%)。其中190例(平均年龄51.5±12.4岁,61%为男性)完成了治疗,89例(47%)对PPI治疗有反应。PAR组有效率最高(73%,n = 11),其次是EAR组(59%,n = 68), pH(+)组(56%,n = 18), pH(-)组(33%,n = 93)。调整年龄、性别、体重指数和内窥镜食管炎的多变量分析显示,单独患有PAR、单独患有EAR和两种pH(+)的参与者对PPI治疗的反应分别比两种pH(-)组高7.4倍(P = 0.008)、4.2倍(P = 0.0002)和3.4倍(P = 0.03)。使用≥1次PAR发作定义的二次分析不太可靠。结论:在没有证实的下咽预测因素的情况下,这项事后分析发现,基线≥2次PAR发作单独与PPI反应性有关,这表明下咽反流监测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Link between pharyngeal acid reflux episodes and the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Background: Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.

Aim: To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.

Methods: Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.

Results: A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, n = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, n = 68), both pH (+) (56%, n = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, n = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (P = 0.008), 4.2-fold (P = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (P = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.

Conclusion: In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the links between gallstone disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and kidney stones: A path to comprehensive prevention. Exploring the therapeutic potential of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists in metabolic disorders. Gel immersion in endoscopy: Exploring potential applications. Imaging characteristics of brain microstructure and cerebral perfusion in Crohn's disease patients with anxiety: A prospective comparative study. Impact of microplastics on the human digestive system: From basic to clinical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1