给学员带来坏消息：SPIKES 临床模式的转化效果如何？

IF 4.8 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1521

Lynnea M Mills, Olle Ten Cate, Christy Boscardin, Patricia S O'Sullivan

{"title":"给学员带来坏消息：SPIKES 临床模式的转化效果如何？","authors":"Lynnea M Mills, Olle Ten Cate, Christy Boscardin, Patricia S O'Sullivan","doi":"10.5334/pme.1521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context. One common model in the clinical setting for 'breaking bad news' to patients is SPIKES: Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, and Summary/Strategy. The authors reviewed evidence in the education setting, particularly from the remediation literature, to consider how the SPIKES model might translate from clinical settings to those in which educators must share 'bad news' with learners about their academic performance. Based on available guidelines and evidence, the authors advocate that the SPIKES model can serve as a useful framework to help educators incorporate, by way of analogy, key components into these conversations, and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"684-692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?\",\"authors\":\"Lynnea M Mills, Olle Ten Cate, Christy Boscardin, Patricia S O'Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/pme.1521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context. One common model in the clinical setting for 'breaking bad news' to patients is SPIKES: Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, and Summary/Strategy. The authors reviewed evidence in the education setting, particularly from the remediation literature, to consider how the SPIKES model might translate from clinical settings to those in which educators must share 'bad news' with learners about their academic performance. Based on available guidelines and evidence, the authors advocate that the SPIKES model can serve as a useful framework to help educators incorporate, by way of analogy, key components into these conversations, and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"684-692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当卫生专业的学习者没有达到评估标准时，教育工作者需要与学习者分享这一信息，并确定下一步提高他们的表现。这些对话可能很困难，教育工作者可能缺乏信心或技巧来进行对话。对于有经验与患者分享具有挑战性的新闻的临床教育者来说，使用临床环境中的类比可能有助于在教育背景下进行这些对话。在临床环境中，向患者“透露坏消息”的一个常见模型是SPIKES：设置、感知、邀请、知识、情感和总结/策略。作者回顾了教育环境中的证据，特别是来自补救文献的证据，以考虑如何将SPIKES模型从临床环境转化为教育者必须与学习者分享学习成绩“坏消息”的环境。基于现有的指导方针和证据，作者主张，SPIKES模型可以作为一个有用的框架，帮助教育工作者通过类比的方式，将关键组成部分纳入这些对话中，并增加成功结果的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?

When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context. One common model in the clinical setting for 'breaking bad news' to patients is SPIKES: Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, and Summary/Strategy. The authors reviewed evidence in the education setting, particularly from the remediation literature, to consider how the SPIKES model might translate from clinical settings to those in which educators must share 'bad news' with learners about their academic performance. Based on available guidelines and evidence, the authors advocate that the SPIKES model can serve as a useful framework to help educators incorporate, by way of analogy, key components into these conversations, and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Perspectives on Medical Education Multiple-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

28 weeks

期刊介绍： Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.