运用扎根理论方法设计管理研究理论化中的冷漠模型。

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1460135
Maryam Asgharinajib, Sima Aalipour, Shahryar Sorooshian
{"title":"运用扎根理论方法设计管理研究理论化中的冷漠模型。","authors":"Maryam Asgharinajib, Sima Aalipour, Shahryar Sorooshian","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1460135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores and elucidates the phenomenon of indifference in theorizing within management research in Iran, highlighting the causal conditions and implications of this indifference on both the academic and practical landscapes of management. Using a qualitative grounded theory methodology, this study synthesized the data collected through interviews with management faculty members from various Iranian universities. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants until theoretical saturation was achieved with 29 interviews. The data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software, enabling the construction of a paradigm model to explain the observed phenomena. The study identified multiple causal conditions contributing to indifference in theorizing, including individual, educational, cultural, economic, social, political, and systemic factors. These factors collectively foster a climate of scientific isolation, hindering the development of management theories and affecting both educators and students. The outcomes of this indifference manifest as a reduction in theoretical innovation and diminished engagement with management theory among academics and practitioners. Indifference, as a key concept in the presented model, represents a type of scientific silence, indicating the unwillingness or inability of researchers to create new and effective theories in the field of management. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed model of the dynamics underlying indifference in theorizing within management studies in Iran, a topic that has received limited attention in the existing literature. The study's findings emphasize the need for systemic changes to overcome barriers to theorizing and suggest pathways for revitalizing theoretical contributions in management research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1460135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a model of indifference in theorizing in management research with grounded theory approach.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Asgharinajib, Sima Aalipour, Shahryar Sorooshian\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frma.2024.1460135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores and elucidates the phenomenon of indifference in theorizing within management research in Iran, highlighting the causal conditions and implications of this indifference on both the academic and practical landscapes of management. Using a qualitative grounded theory methodology, this study synthesized the data collected through interviews with management faculty members from various Iranian universities. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants until theoretical saturation was achieved with 29 interviews. The data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software, enabling the construction of a paradigm model to explain the observed phenomena. The study identified multiple causal conditions contributing to indifference in theorizing, including individual, educational, cultural, economic, social, political, and systemic factors. These factors collectively foster a climate of scientific isolation, hindering the development of management theories and affecting both educators and students. The outcomes of this indifference manifest as a reduction in theoretical innovation and diminished engagement with management theory among academics and practitioners. Indifference, as a key concept in the presented model, represents a type of scientific silence, indicating the unwillingness or inability of researchers to create new and effective theories in the field of management. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed model of the dynamics underlying indifference in theorizing within management studies in Iran, a topic that has received limited attention in the existing literature. The study's findings emphasize the need for systemic changes to overcome barriers to theorizing and suggest pathways for revitalizing theoretical contributions in management research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1460135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672210/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1460135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1460135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨并阐明了伊朗管理研究中的理论化冷漠现象,强调了这种冷漠现象的因果条件及其对管理学术和实践领域的影响。本研究采用定性基础理论方法,综合了通过与伊朗多所大学的管理学院教师访谈收集到的数据。在选择参与者时采用了有目的的抽样,直到 29 个访谈达到理论饱和为止。使用 ATLAS.ti 软件对数据进行了分析,从而构建了一个范式模型来解释观察到的现象。研究发现了导致理论化冷漠的多种因果条件,包括个人、教育、文化、经济、社会、政治和系统因素。这些因素共同营造了一种科学孤立的氛围,阻碍了管理理论的发展,对教育工作者和学生都造成了影响。这种冷漠的结果表明,理论创新减少,学术界和实践者对管理理论的参与度降低。冷漠,作为本模型中的一个关键概念,代表了一种科学沉默,表明研究人员不愿意或没有能力在管理领域创造新的有效理论。本研究为这一领域做出了贡献,提供了伊朗管理研究中理论化冷漠背后的动力的详细模型,现有文献对这一主题的关注有限。研究结果强调有必要进行系统变革,以克服理论化的障碍,并提出了振兴管理研究中理论贡献的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing a model of indifference in theorizing in management research with grounded theory approach.

This study explores and elucidates the phenomenon of indifference in theorizing within management research in Iran, highlighting the causal conditions and implications of this indifference on both the academic and practical landscapes of management. Using a qualitative grounded theory methodology, this study synthesized the data collected through interviews with management faculty members from various Iranian universities. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants until theoretical saturation was achieved with 29 interviews. The data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software, enabling the construction of a paradigm model to explain the observed phenomena. The study identified multiple causal conditions contributing to indifference in theorizing, including individual, educational, cultural, economic, social, political, and systemic factors. These factors collectively foster a climate of scientific isolation, hindering the development of management theories and affecting both educators and students. The outcomes of this indifference manifest as a reduction in theoretical innovation and diminished engagement with management theory among academics and practitioners. Indifference, as a key concept in the presented model, represents a type of scientific silence, indicating the unwillingness or inability of researchers to create new and effective theories in the field of management. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed model of the dynamics underlying indifference in theorizing within management studies in Iran, a topic that has received limited attention in the existing literature. The study's findings emphasize the need for systemic changes to overcome barriers to theorizing and suggest pathways for revitalizing theoretical contributions in management research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review. Economic value of HPC experience for new STEM professionals: Insights from STEM hiring managers. The ethics of artificial intelligence use in university libraries in Zimbabwe. Patent research in academic literature. Landscape and trends with a focus on patent analytics. A role for qualitative methods in researching Twitter data on a popular science article's communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1