在低雷诺数的一个厚泪滴翼型的rans和iles基于计算结果的比较

IF 0.5 4区 工程技术 Q4 MECHANICS Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1134/S0021894424020056
M. A. Akimov, P. A. Polivanov, A. A. Sidorenko
{"title":"在低雷诺数的一个厚泪滴翼型的rans和iles基于计算结果的比较","authors":"M. A. Akimov,&nbsp;P. A. Polivanov,&nbsp;A. A. Sidorenko","doi":"10.1134/S0021894424020056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A flow around a symmetrical thick teardrop airfoil in a nonstationary formulation is numerically modeled at Reynolds numbers <span>\\(\\mathrm{Re}=10^4{-}10^5\\)</span> and in a range of angles of attack <span>\\(\\alpha=~-10{-}10^\\circ\\)</span>. Calculations are based on the approximation of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) equations using the implicit large-eddy simulation (ILES). The URANS approach requires that the position of a laminar-turbulent transition is determined using <span>\\(k{-}kl{-}\\omega\\)</span> and <span>\\(k{-}\\omega{-}\\gamma{-}\\mathrm{Re}_\\theta\\)</span> models, as well as (<span>\\(k{-}\\omega\\)</span>)-SST models with a given laminar flow region. It is shown that the flow pattern and aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil are greatly affected by the position of the laminar-turbulent transition region. It is suggested by the comparison of the results obtained using the ILES approach with experimental data that they are in good agreement. The URANS based calculations do not yield results consistent with experimental data. Fixing the laminar-turbulent transition point in the URANS calculation in some cases make it possible to correct the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics","volume":"65 2","pages":"233 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF RANS AND ILES BASED CALCULATIONS FOR A THICK TEARDROP AIRFOIL AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Akimov,&nbsp;P. A. Polivanov,&nbsp;A. A. Sidorenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0021894424020056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A flow around a symmetrical thick teardrop airfoil in a nonstationary formulation is numerically modeled at Reynolds numbers <span>\\\\(\\\\mathrm{Re}=10^4{-}10^5\\\\)</span> and in a range of angles of attack <span>\\\\(\\\\alpha=~-10{-}10^\\\\circ\\\\)</span>. Calculations are based on the approximation of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) equations using the implicit large-eddy simulation (ILES). The URANS approach requires that the position of a laminar-turbulent transition is determined using <span>\\\\(k{-}kl{-}\\\\omega\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(k{-}\\\\omega{-}\\\\gamma{-}\\\\mathrm{Re}_\\\\theta\\\\)</span> models, as well as (<span>\\\\(k{-}\\\\omega\\\\)</span>)-SST models with a given laminar flow region. It is shown that the flow pattern and aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil are greatly affected by the position of the laminar-turbulent transition region. It is suggested by the comparison of the results obtained using the ILES approach with experimental data that they are in good agreement. The URANS based calculations do not yield results consistent with experimental data. Fixing the laminar-turbulent transition point in the URANS calculation in some cases make it possible to correct the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"233 - 248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0021894424020056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0021894424020056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个流动周围的对称厚泪滴翼型在一个非平稳公式是数值模拟在雷诺数\(\mathrm{Re}=10^4{-}10^5\)和在攻角范围\(\alpha=~-10{-}10^\circ\)。计算基于使用隐式大涡模拟(ILES)的非定常reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (URANS)方程的近似。URANS方法要求使用\(k{-}kl{-}\omega\)和\(k{-}\omega{-}\gamma{-}\mathrm{Re}_\theta\)模型以及(\(k{-}\omega\))-SST模型确定层流-湍流过渡的位置,该模型具有给定的层流区域。结果表明,流-湍流过渡区的位置对翼型的流态和气动特性有很大影响。用ILES方法得到的结果与实验数据的比较表明,两者符合得很好。基于URANS的计算结果与实验数据不一致。在某些情况下,固定URANS计算中的层流-湍流过渡点使修正结果成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF RANS AND ILES BASED CALCULATIONS FOR A THICK TEARDROP AIRFOIL AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS

A flow around a symmetrical thick teardrop airfoil in a nonstationary formulation is numerically modeled at Reynolds numbers \(\mathrm{Re}=10^4{-}10^5\) and in a range of angles of attack \(\alpha=~-10{-}10^\circ\). Calculations are based on the approximation of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) equations using the implicit large-eddy simulation (ILES). The URANS approach requires that the position of a laminar-turbulent transition is determined using \(k{-}kl{-}\omega\) and \(k{-}\omega{-}\gamma{-}\mathrm{Re}_\theta\) models, as well as (\(k{-}\omega\))-SST models with a given laminar flow region. It is shown that the flow pattern and aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil are greatly affected by the position of the laminar-turbulent transition region. It is suggested by the comparison of the results obtained using the ILES approach with experimental data that they are in good agreement. The URANS based calculations do not yield results consistent with experimental data. Fixing the laminar-turbulent transition point in the URANS calculation in some cases make it possible to correct the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics is a journal published in collaboration with the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The Journal presents papers on fluid mechanics and applied physics. Each issue contains valuable contributions on hypersonic flows; boundary layer theory; turbulence and hydrodynamic stability; free boundary flows; plasma physics; shock waves; explosives and detonation processes; combustion theory; multiphase flows; heat and mass transfer; composite materials and thermal properties of new materials, plasticity, creep, and failure.
期刊最新文献
DIFFUSION WAVE INITIATION PROBLEM FOR A NONLINEAR PARABOLIC SYSTEM IN THE CASES OF SPHERICAL AND CYLINDRICAL SYMMETRY EFFECT OF SPANWISE-UNIFORM STREAKS ON SWEPT-WING BOUNDARY LAYER WITH ENHANCED FREE-STREAM VORTICITY AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF FLOW SEPARATION IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDARY LAYERS HEAT TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS OF PLATE-FIN HEAT SINKS ENHANCED BY PIEZOELECTRIC FANS OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR A FIBER-WOUND PRESSURE VESSEL WITH A STABLE STRENGTH RATIO BASED ON THE HYBRID METHOD OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND GREY WOLF OPTIMIZATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1