胸外伤患者静脉注射氯胺酮与酮罗拉酸镇痛剂量的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1111/acem.15050
Hossein Zabihi Mahmoodabadi, Zeynab Seyed Javadein, Fatemeh Moosaie, Ali Faegh, Maryam Bahreini
{"title":"胸外伤患者静脉注射氯胺酮与酮罗拉酸镇痛剂量的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验。","authors":"Hossein Zabihi Mahmoodabadi, Zeynab Seyed Javadein, Fatemeh Moosaie, Ali Faegh, Maryam Bahreini","doi":"10.1111/acem.15050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management is a critical part of treatment in patients with chest trauma. Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been the most commonly used medications. However, their side effects have drawn attention to other medications. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of the analgesic dose of ketamine in patients with chest trauma in comparison to ketorolac.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in three hospitals. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 45 in the ketorolac group (30 mg intravenous [IV] and 45 in the ketamine group [0.25 mg/kg IV]). Pain was rated via numeric rating scale (NRS) before and 30 and 60 min after the drug injection. Morphine was used as the rescue medication. Furthermore, the adverse events of the two study regimens were rated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain was more significantly relieved in the ketamine group, 30 and 60 min after drug administration, compared to ketorolac (median [IQR] 95% CI 30-min NRS 3.0 [1.0] 2.8-3.5 vs. 5.0 [4.5] 4.2-5.8, p = 0.006; and 60-min NRS 3.0 [2.0] 2.7-3.7 vs. 5.6 [1.7] 4.7-6.4, p < 0.001), respectively. Among patients with a chest tube, pain was more significantly controlled in the ketamine group (p < 0.001). Also, patients in the ketamine group needed less rescue pain medications compared to the ketorolac group although they reported more frequent nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ketamine can be an effective analgesic in patients with chest trauma in acute settings with or without rib fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the analgesic dose of intravenous ketamine versus ketorolac in patients with chest trauma: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Zabihi Mahmoodabadi, Zeynab Seyed Javadein, Fatemeh Moosaie, Ali Faegh, Maryam Bahreini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.15050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management is a critical part of treatment in patients with chest trauma. Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been the most commonly used medications. However, their side effects have drawn attention to other medications. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of the analgesic dose of ketamine in patients with chest trauma in comparison to ketorolac.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in three hospitals. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 45 in the ketorolac group (30 mg intravenous [IV] and 45 in the ketamine group [0.25 mg/kg IV]). Pain was rated via numeric rating scale (NRS) before and 30 and 60 min after the drug injection. Morphine was used as the rescue medication. Furthermore, the adverse events of the two study regimens were rated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain was more significantly relieved in the ketamine group, 30 and 60 min after drug administration, compared to ketorolac (median [IQR] 95% CI 30-min NRS 3.0 [1.0] 2.8-3.5 vs. 5.0 [4.5] 4.2-5.8, p = 0.006; and 60-min NRS 3.0 [2.0] 2.7-3.7 vs. 5.6 [1.7] 4.7-6.4, p < 0.001), respectively. Among patients with a chest tube, pain was more significantly controlled in the ketamine group (p < 0.001). Also, patients in the ketamine group needed less rescue pain medications compared to the ketorolac group although they reported more frequent nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ketamine can be an effective analgesic in patients with chest trauma in acute settings with or without rib fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛管理是胸部创伤患者治疗的关键部分。阿片类药物和非甾体类抗炎药是最常用的药物。然而,它们的副作用引起了人们对其他药物的关注。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估氯胺酮镇痛剂量对胸部创伤患者的影响,并与酮罗拉酸进行比较。方法:在三家医院进行随机、双盲临床试验。患者随机分为两组:酮咯酸组45例(静脉注射30 mg [IV]),氯胺酮组45例(静脉注射0.25 mg/kg])。采用数值评定量表(NRS)对注射前、注射后30、60 min的疼痛进行评定。吗啡作为抢救药物。此外,对两种研究方案的不良事件进行了评估。结果:氯胺酮组在给药后30和60 min疼痛的缓解较酮罗拉酸组更为显著(中位[IQR] 95% CI 30-min NRS 3.0 [1.0] 2.8-3.5 vs. 5.0 [4.5] 4.2-5.8, p = 0.006;60 min NRS 3.0 [2.0] 2.7 ~ 3.7 vs. 5.6 [1.7] 4.7 ~ 6.4, p结论:氯胺酮可作为急性胸外伤伴或不伴肋骨骨折患者的有效镇痛药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the analgesic dose of intravenous ketamine versus ketorolac in patients with chest trauma: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Background: Pain management is a critical part of treatment in patients with chest trauma. Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been the most commonly used medications. However, their side effects have drawn attention to other medications. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of the analgesic dose of ketamine in patients with chest trauma in comparison to ketorolac.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in three hospitals. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 45 in the ketorolac group (30 mg intravenous [IV] and 45 in the ketamine group [0.25 mg/kg IV]). Pain was rated via numeric rating scale (NRS) before and 30 and 60 min after the drug injection. Morphine was used as the rescue medication. Furthermore, the adverse events of the two study regimens were rated.

Results: Pain was more significantly relieved in the ketamine group, 30 and 60 min after drug administration, compared to ketorolac (median [IQR] 95% CI 30-min NRS 3.0 [1.0] 2.8-3.5 vs. 5.0 [4.5] 4.2-5.8, p = 0.006; and 60-min NRS 3.0 [2.0] 2.7-3.7 vs. 5.6 [1.7] 4.7-6.4, p < 0.001), respectively. Among patients with a chest tube, pain was more significantly controlled in the ketamine group (p < 0.001). Also, patients in the ketamine group needed less rescue pain medications compared to the ketorolac group although they reported more frequent nausea.

Conclusion: Ketamine can be an effective analgesic in patients with chest trauma in acute settings with or without rib fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Low-cost interventions to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among emergency department patients: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Will you help us? An assessment of bias in driver's license suspension based on toxicology screening of patients in serious motor vehicle collisions. Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions. Clinical trials in the emergency department: Concierge coordinators to reduce attrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1