预测肾移植受者的肾移植功能和衰竭。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02445-6
Yi Yao, Brad C Astor, Wei Yang, Tom Greene, Liang Li
{"title":"预测肾移植受者的肾移植功能和衰竭。","authors":"Yi Yao, Brad C Astor, Wei Yang, Tom Greene, Liang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02445-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graft loss is a major health concern for kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. It is of clinical interest to develop a prognostic model for both graft function, quantified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the risk of graft failure. Additionally, the model should be dynamic in the sense that it adapts to accumulating longitudinal information, including time-varying at-risk population, predictor-outcome association, and clinical history. Finally, the model should also properly account for the competing risk by death with a functioning graft. A model with the features above is not yet available in the literature and is the focus of this research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built and internally validated a prediction model on 3,893 patients from the Wisconsin Allograft Recipient Database (WisARD) who had a functioning graft 6 months after kidney transplantation. The landmark analysis approach was used to build a proof-of-concept dynamic prediction model to address the aforementioned methodological issues: the prediction of graft failure, accounted for competing risk of death, as well as the future eGFR value, are updated at each post-transplant time. We used 21 predictors including recipient characteristics, donor characteristics, transplant-related and post-transplant factors, longitudinal eGFR, hospitalization, and rejection history. A sensitivity analysis explored a less conservative variable selection rule that resulted in a more parsimonious model with reduced predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For prediction up to the next 1 to 5 years, the model achieved high accuracy in predicting graft failure, with the AUC between 0.80 and 0.95, and moderately high accuracy in predicting eGFR, with the root mean squared error between 10 and 18 mL/min/1.73m2 and 70%-90% of predicted eGFR falling within 30% of the observed eGFR. The model demonstrated substantial accuracy improvement compared to a conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model outperformed conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors. It is a useful tool for patient counseling and clinical management of KTx and is currently available as a web app.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting kidney graft function and failure among kidney transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Yao, Brad C Astor, Wei Yang, Tom Greene, Liang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02445-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graft loss is a major health concern for kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. It is of clinical interest to develop a prognostic model for both graft function, quantified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the risk of graft failure. Additionally, the model should be dynamic in the sense that it adapts to accumulating longitudinal information, including time-varying at-risk population, predictor-outcome association, and clinical history. Finally, the model should also properly account for the competing risk by death with a functioning graft. A model with the features above is not yet available in the literature and is the focus of this research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built and internally validated a prediction model on 3,893 patients from the Wisconsin Allograft Recipient Database (WisARD) who had a functioning graft 6 months after kidney transplantation. The landmark analysis approach was used to build a proof-of-concept dynamic prediction model to address the aforementioned methodological issues: the prediction of graft failure, accounted for competing risk of death, as well as the future eGFR value, are updated at each post-transplant time. We used 21 predictors including recipient characteristics, donor characteristics, transplant-related and post-transplant factors, longitudinal eGFR, hospitalization, and rejection history. A sensitivity analysis explored a less conservative variable selection rule that resulted in a more parsimonious model with reduced predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For prediction up to the next 1 to 5 years, the model achieved high accuracy in predicting graft failure, with the AUC between 0.80 and 0.95, and moderately high accuracy in predicting eGFR, with the root mean squared error between 10 and 18 mL/min/1.73m2 and 70%-90% of predicted eGFR falling within 30% of the observed eGFR. The model demonstrated substantial accuracy improvement compared to a conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model outperformed conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors. It is a useful tool for patient counseling and clinical management of KTx and is currently available as a web app.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02445-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02445-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移植物损失是肾移植(KTx)受者的主要健康问题。通过估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和移植物衰竭风险来量化移植物功能的预后模型具有临床意义。此外,模型应该是动态的,因为它可以适应纵向信息的积累,包括时变的危险人群、预测结果关联和临床病史。最后,该模型还应适当地考虑到与功能正常的移植物竞争的死亡风险。具有上述特征的模型在文献中尚未出现,是本研究的重点。方法:我们建立了一个预测模型,并在内部验证了3893例来自威斯康星州同种异体移植受体数据库(WisARD)的患者,这些患者在肾移植后6个月移植了功能正常的移植物。里程碑分析方法用于构建概念验证动态预测模型,以解决上述方法学问题:移植后每个时间更新移植失败的预测,考虑竞争死亡风险,以及未来的eGFR值。我们使用了21个预测因素,包括受体特征、供体特征、移植相关和移植后因素、纵向eGFR、住院和排斥史。敏感性分析探索了一个不太保守的变量选择规则,从而产生了一个更简洁的模型,减少了预测因子。结果:对于未来1 - 5年的预测,该模型在预测移植物衰竭方面具有较高的准确性,AUC在0.80 - 0.95之间,预测eGFR的准确度中等,均方根误差在10 - 18 mL/min/1.73m2之间,70%-90%的预测eGFR落在观察到的eGFR的30%以内。与仅使用基线预测因子的传统预测模型相比,该模型显示出显著的准确性提高。结论:该模型优于仅使用基线预测因子的传统预测模型。它是KTx患者咨询和临床管理的有用工具,目前作为web应用程序可用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting kidney graft function and failure among kidney transplant recipients.

Background: Graft loss is a major health concern for kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. It is of clinical interest to develop a prognostic model for both graft function, quantified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the risk of graft failure. Additionally, the model should be dynamic in the sense that it adapts to accumulating longitudinal information, including time-varying at-risk population, predictor-outcome association, and clinical history. Finally, the model should also properly account for the competing risk by death with a functioning graft. A model with the features above is not yet available in the literature and is the focus of this research.

Methods: We built and internally validated a prediction model on 3,893 patients from the Wisconsin Allograft Recipient Database (WisARD) who had a functioning graft 6 months after kidney transplantation. The landmark analysis approach was used to build a proof-of-concept dynamic prediction model to address the aforementioned methodological issues: the prediction of graft failure, accounted for competing risk of death, as well as the future eGFR value, are updated at each post-transplant time. We used 21 predictors including recipient characteristics, donor characteristics, transplant-related and post-transplant factors, longitudinal eGFR, hospitalization, and rejection history. A sensitivity analysis explored a less conservative variable selection rule that resulted in a more parsimonious model with reduced predictors.

Results: For prediction up to the next 1 to 5 years, the model achieved high accuracy in predicting graft failure, with the AUC between 0.80 and 0.95, and moderately high accuracy in predicting eGFR, with the root mean squared error between 10 and 18 mL/min/1.73m2 and 70%-90% of predicted eGFR falling within 30% of the observed eGFR. The model demonstrated substantial accuracy improvement compared to a conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors.

Conclusion: The model outperformed conventional prediction model that used only baseline predictors. It is a useful tool for patient counseling and clinical management of KTx and is currently available as a web app.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
A generative model for evaluating missing data methods in large epidemiological cohorts. Discrepancies in safety reporting for chronic back pain clinical trials: an observational study from ClinicalTrials.gov and publications. Multiple states clustering analysis (MSCA), an unsupervised approach to multiple time-to-event electronic health records applied to multimorbidity associated with myocardial infarction. Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1