{"title":"一项前瞻性观察研究:外周给药氟沙吡坦/氟沙吡坦的血管疼痛和护理负担。","authors":"Yuko Kubota, Shiro Hatakeyama, Shuhei Suzuki, Hiroki Sawada, Yuko Sato, Takashi Yoshioka, Chika Ozawa","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Vascular pain associated with NK1 receptor antagonists, particularly fosaprepitant, remains a significant challenge in cancer chemotherapy. The present study investigated the incidence of vascular pain with the administration of fosaprepitant and fosnetupitant and assessed the psychological burden on nurses performing venipuncture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study involving 115 cancer patients receiving NK1 receptor antagonists via peripheral venous catheters. Vascular pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale. Nurses' psychological burden was assessed through questionnaires and a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vascular pain occurred in 19% of 304 venipunctures, and its incidence was significantly lower with fosnetupitant (3.1%) than with fosaprepitant (22.9%) (p<0.01). Switching from fosaprepitant to fosnetupitant reduced pain in all cases. Nurses experienced psychological burden in 97% of venipunctures, with severe distress (NRS ≥3) in 19% of cases. The qualitative analysis revealed that nurses' distress was affected by the vascular status, patient behavior, and concerns about drug administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of vascular pain was lower with fosnetupitant than with fosaprepitant. Nurses experienced significant psychological burden during venipuncture, particularly when patients reported pain. These results suggest that fosnetupitant is a preferable option for reducing both patient discomfort and nurses' psychological burden in chemotherapy administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 1","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular Pain and Nurse Burden in Peripheral Administration of Fosaprepitant/Fosnetupitant: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuko Kubota, Shiro Hatakeyama, Shuhei Suzuki, Hiroki Sawada, Yuko Sato, Takashi Yoshioka, Chika Ozawa\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Vascular pain associated with NK1 receptor antagonists, particularly fosaprepitant, remains a significant challenge in cancer chemotherapy. The present study investigated the incidence of vascular pain with the administration of fosaprepitant and fosnetupitant and assessed the psychological burden on nurses performing venipuncture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study involving 115 cancer patients receiving NK1 receptor antagonists via peripheral venous catheters. Vascular pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale. Nurses' psychological burden was assessed through questionnaires and a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vascular pain occurred in 19% of 304 venipunctures, and its incidence was significantly lower with fosnetupitant (3.1%) than with fosaprepitant (22.9%) (p<0.01). Switching from fosaprepitant to fosnetupitant reduced pain in all cases. Nurses experienced psychological burden in 97% of venipunctures, with severe distress (NRS ≥3) in 19% of cases. The qualitative analysis revealed that nurses' distress was affected by the vascular status, patient behavior, and concerns about drug administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of vascular pain was lower with fosnetupitant than with fosaprepitant. Nurses experienced significant psychological burden during venipuncture, particularly when patients reported pain. These results suggest that fosnetupitant is a preferable option for reducing both patient discomfort and nurses' psychological burden in chemotherapy administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"277-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vascular Pain and Nurse Burden in Peripheral Administration of Fosaprepitant/Fosnetupitant: A Prospective Observational Study.
Background/aim: Vascular pain associated with NK1 receptor antagonists, particularly fosaprepitant, remains a significant challenge in cancer chemotherapy. The present study investigated the incidence of vascular pain with the administration of fosaprepitant and fosnetupitant and assessed the psychological burden on nurses performing venipuncture.
Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study involving 115 cancer patients receiving NK1 receptor antagonists via peripheral venous catheters. Vascular pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale. Nurses' psychological burden was assessed through questionnaires and a qualitative analysis.
Results: Vascular pain occurred in 19% of 304 venipunctures, and its incidence was significantly lower with fosnetupitant (3.1%) than with fosaprepitant (22.9%) (p<0.01). Switching from fosaprepitant to fosnetupitant reduced pain in all cases. Nurses experienced psychological burden in 97% of venipunctures, with severe distress (NRS ≥3) in 19% of cases. The qualitative analysis revealed that nurses' distress was affected by the vascular status, patient behavior, and concerns about drug administration.
Conclusion: The incidence of vascular pain was lower with fosnetupitant than with fosaprepitant. Nurses experienced significant psychological burden during venipuncture, particularly when patients reported pain. These results suggest that fosnetupitant is a preferable option for reducing both patient discomfort and nurses' psychological burden in chemotherapy administration.
期刊介绍:
ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed.
ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies).
Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.