运动学手的协同作用不同于伸手抓握和功能对象操作。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1152/jn.00101.2024
A Michael West, Neville Hogan
{"title":"运动学手的协同作用不同于伸手抓握和功能对象操作。","authors":"A Michael West, Neville Hogan","doi":"10.1152/jn.00101.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans possess a unique ability to manipulate tools to help us navigate the world around us. This ability is facilitated by the dexterity of our hands. However, millions lose this capability annually due to conditions like limb amputation or cerebral vascular accident (i.e., stroke). This great loss of human hand function has led to increased study of human hand action. Although previous research focused on coordinated hand motion, known as synergies, during reaching and grasping, manipulation of complex objects remains understudied. Specifically, we aimed to test two hypotheses: <i>1</i>) the number of synergies underlying manipulation is the same as those underlying reach-and-grasp, and <i>2</i>) the identity of synergies underlying manipulation is different from those underlying reach-and-grasp. To do so, we measured human hand motion during two experiments: <i>1</i>) during reach and grasp of a tool or object commonly used in wire harness installation and <i>2</i>) during manipulation of those objects and tools to install a wire harness on a mock electrical cabinet. Results showed that manipulation generally required more synergies than grasp. Comparison between reach-and-grasp and manipulation revealed a decrease in synergy similarity with synergy-order. Considering that higher-order synergies become significant during manipulation, it is important that we investigate these differences; this study serves as a point of entry to doing so. If we want our prosthetic and rehabilitative devices to restore hand function to those who have lost it, we must study hand function, specifically manipulation, and not just grasping.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study uncovers new insights into kinematic synergies during functional human hand manipulation of objects and tools, through the study of wire harness installation. It emphasizes the nuanced distinctions between functional hand manipulation and simple grasping, revealing that manipulation tasks require a greater number and distinct subset of hand synergies compared with simple grasp actions. This research marks a significant step toward appreciating the intricacies of hand coordination in complex tasks beyond grasping.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"547-560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic hand synergies differ between reach-and-grasp and functional object manipulation.\",\"authors\":\"A Michael West, Neville Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00101.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humans possess a unique ability to manipulate tools to help us navigate the world around us. This ability is facilitated by the dexterity of our hands. However, millions lose this capability annually due to conditions like limb amputation or cerebral vascular accident (i.e., stroke). This great loss of human hand function has led to increased study of human hand action. Although previous research focused on coordinated hand motion, known as synergies, during reaching and grasping, manipulation of complex objects remains understudied. Specifically, we aimed to test two hypotheses: <i>1</i>) the number of synergies underlying manipulation is the same as those underlying reach-and-grasp, and <i>2</i>) the identity of synergies underlying manipulation is different from those underlying reach-and-grasp. To do so, we measured human hand motion during two experiments: <i>1</i>) during reach and grasp of a tool or object commonly used in wire harness installation and <i>2</i>) during manipulation of those objects and tools to install a wire harness on a mock electrical cabinet. Results showed that manipulation generally required more synergies than grasp. Comparison between reach-and-grasp and manipulation revealed a decrease in synergy similarity with synergy-order. Considering that higher-order synergies become significant during manipulation, it is important that we investigate these differences; this study serves as a point of entry to doing so. If we want our prosthetic and rehabilitative devices to restore hand function to those who have lost it, we must study hand function, specifically manipulation, and not just grasping.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study uncovers new insights into kinematic synergies during functional human hand manipulation of objects and tools, through the study of wire harness installation. It emphasizes the nuanced distinctions between functional hand manipulation and simple grasping, revealing that manipulation tasks require a greater number and distinct subset of hand synergies compared with simple grasp actions. This research marks a significant step toward appreciating the intricacies of hand coordination in complex tasks beyond grasping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"547-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00101.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00101.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类拥有一种独特的能力,可以操纵工具来帮助我们驾驭周围的世界。这种能力得益于我们双手的灵巧。然而,每年有数百万人由于截肢或脑血管事故(即中风)等情况而失去这种能力。人类手部功能的严重丧失导致了对人类手部动作的研究的增加。虽然以前的研究主要集中在手的协调运动,称为协同作用,在伸手和抓握过程中,复杂物体的操作仍然研究不足。具体而言,我们旨在检验两个假设:(1)操纵背后的协同效应数量与那些潜在的达到和掌握相同;(2)操纵背后的协同效应的身份不同于那些潜在的达到和掌握。为此,我们在两个实验中测量了人手的运动:(1)在到达和抓住线束安装中常用的工具或物体时,以及(2)在操纵这些物体和工具在模拟电气柜上安装线束时。结果表明,操作通常比抓取需要更多的协同作用。伸手抓握与操作的比较显示协同相似度随协同顺序而降低。考虑到高阶协同效应在操纵过程中变得显著,我们研究这些差异是很重要的;这项研究是这样做的一个切入点。如果我们想让我们的假肢和康复设备恢复那些失去手的人的手功能,我们必须研究手的功能,特别是操作,而不仅仅是抓取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kinematic hand synergies differ between reach-and-grasp and functional object manipulation.

Humans possess a unique ability to manipulate tools to help us navigate the world around us. This ability is facilitated by the dexterity of our hands. However, millions lose this capability annually due to conditions like limb amputation or cerebral vascular accident (i.e., stroke). This great loss of human hand function has led to increased study of human hand action. Although previous research focused on coordinated hand motion, known as synergies, during reaching and grasping, manipulation of complex objects remains understudied. Specifically, we aimed to test two hypotheses: 1) the number of synergies underlying manipulation is the same as those underlying reach-and-grasp, and 2) the identity of synergies underlying manipulation is different from those underlying reach-and-grasp. To do so, we measured human hand motion during two experiments: 1) during reach and grasp of a tool or object commonly used in wire harness installation and 2) during manipulation of those objects and tools to install a wire harness on a mock electrical cabinet. Results showed that manipulation generally required more synergies than grasp. Comparison between reach-and-grasp and manipulation revealed a decrease in synergy similarity with synergy-order. Considering that higher-order synergies become significant during manipulation, it is important that we investigate these differences; this study serves as a point of entry to doing so. If we want our prosthetic and rehabilitative devices to restore hand function to those who have lost it, we must study hand function, specifically manipulation, and not just grasping.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study uncovers new insights into kinematic synergies during functional human hand manipulation of objects and tools, through the study of wire harness installation. It emphasizes the nuanced distinctions between functional hand manipulation and simple grasping, revealing that manipulation tasks require a greater number and distinct subset of hand synergies compared with simple grasp actions. This research marks a significant step toward appreciating the intricacies of hand coordination in complex tasks beyond grasping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
Changes in thoracic erector spinae regional activation during postural adjustments and functional reaching tasks after spinal cord injury. Cortical acetylcholine response to deep brain stimulation of the basal forebrain in mice. Differentiating the contributions of Na+/K+ pump current and persistent Na+ current in simulated voltage-clamp experiments. Feature selectivity of corticocortical feedback along the primate dorsal visual pathway. Without visual feedback voluntary torque is overestimated during muscle potentiation despite similar motor unit firing rate and perception of exertion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1