{"title":"经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS):肝硬化和临床显著门静脉高压症的病态肥胖患者减肥手术的桥梁。","authors":"Raluca Pais, Yasmina Chouik, Lucile Moga, Louise Lebedel, Christine Silvain, Laurent Genser, Delphine Weill, Hélène Larrue, Emilie Malézieux, Caroline Jezéquel, Maud Robert, Hélène Regnault, Jérôme Dumortier, Vlad Ratziu, Dominique Thabut, Marika Rudler","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07583-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cirrhotic patients, portal hypertension increases mortality after surgery. We evaluated the impact of pre-operative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on the outcomes of bariatric surgery in cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentric retrospective cohort. The decision for TIPS placement has been made according to hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) values and centers' policy. The primary outcome: 1-year decompensation-free survival; secondary outcomes: 1-year acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included (2010-2022): 92% Child-Pugh A, MELD score 8, age 55 years, BMI 38.3 ± 13 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 9 (18%) had TIPS. At baseline, patients with TIPS had more esophageal varices (89% vs 10%, p < 0.001), more previous decompensations (22% vs 0%, p = 0.002), and a higher HVPG (14 vs 7 mmHg, p < 0.001). All patients in the TIPS group had clinically significant portal hypertension vs 11% of patients without TIPS, p < 0.001. One-year decompensation-free survival was 77.8% and 93.2% in patients with and without TIPS, p = 0.064. ALCF occurred in 3 patients (6.8%) without TIPS and none with TIPS. All patients were alive 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) undergoing bariatric surgery, TIPS placement was safe and had similar outcomes after surgery as patients without TIPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"395-405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS): A Bridge to Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients with Cirrhosis and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Raluca Pais, Yasmina Chouik, Lucile Moga, Louise Lebedel, Christine Silvain, Laurent Genser, Delphine Weill, Hélène Larrue, Emilie Malézieux, Caroline Jezéquel, Maud Robert, Hélène Regnault, Jérôme Dumortier, Vlad Ratziu, Dominique Thabut, Marika Rudler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07583-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cirrhotic patients, portal hypertension increases mortality after surgery. We evaluated the impact of pre-operative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on the outcomes of bariatric surgery in cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentric retrospective cohort. The decision for TIPS placement has been made according to hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) values and centers' policy. The primary outcome: 1-year decompensation-free survival; secondary outcomes: 1-year acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included (2010-2022): 92% Child-Pugh A, MELD score 8, age 55 years, BMI 38.3 ± 13 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 9 (18%) had TIPS. At baseline, patients with TIPS had more esophageal varices (89% vs 10%, p < 0.001), more previous decompensations (22% vs 0%, p = 0.002), and a higher HVPG (14 vs 7 mmHg, p < 0.001). All patients in the TIPS group had clinically significant portal hypertension vs 11% of patients without TIPS, p < 0.001. One-year decompensation-free survival was 77.8% and 93.2% in patients with and without TIPS, p = 0.064. ALCF occurred in 3 patients (6.8%) without TIPS and none with TIPS. All patients were alive 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) undergoing bariatric surgery, TIPS placement was safe and had similar outcomes after surgery as patients without TIPS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"395-405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07583-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07583-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在肝硬化患者中,门静脉高压症会增加术后死亡率。我们评估了术前经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)对肝硬化患者减肥手术结果的影响。方法:多中心回顾性队列研究。根据肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)值和中心的政策决定TIPS的放置。主要终点:1年无失代偿生存期;次要结局:1年急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)和生存。结果:纳入53例患者(2010-2022):92% Child-Pugh A, MELD评分8分,年龄55岁,BMI 38.3±13 kg/m2, 9例(18%)有TIPS。在基线时,TIPS患者有更多的食管静脉曲张(89% vs 10%, p)。结论:在接受减肥手术的肝硬化和临床显著门脉高压(CSPH)患者中,TIPS放置是安全的,手术后的结果与没有TIPS的患者相似。
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS): A Bridge to Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients with Cirrhosis and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension.
Background: In cirrhotic patients, portal hypertension increases mortality after surgery. We evaluated the impact of pre-operative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on the outcomes of bariatric surgery in cirrhosis.
Methods: Multicentric retrospective cohort. The decision for TIPS placement has been made according to hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) values and centers' policy. The primary outcome: 1-year decompensation-free survival; secondary outcomes: 1-year acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and survival.
Results: Fifty-three patients were included (2010-2022): 92% Child-Pugh A, MELD score 8, age 55 years, BMI 38.3 ± 13 kg/m2, 9 (18%) had TIPS. At baseline, patients with TIPS had more esophageal varices (89% vs 10%, p < 0.001), more previous decompensations (22% vs 0%, p = 0.002), and a higher HVPG (14 vs 7 mmHg, p < 0.001). All patients in the TIPS group had clinically significant portal hypertension vs 11% of patients without TIPS, p < 0.001. One-year decompensation-free survival was 77.8% and 93.2% in patients with and without TIPS, p = 0.064. ALCF occurred in 3 patients (6.8%) without TIPS and none with TIPS. All patients were alive 1 year after surgery.
Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) undergoing bariatric surgery, TIPS placement was safe and had similar outcomes after surgery as patients without TIPS.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions.
Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.