Mattia Bozzetti, Claudia Fantuzzi, Dina El Lahlah, Sara Casagrande, Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Maria Müller Staub
{"title":"护理诊断、干预和结果（Q-DIO）文件质量的使用和心理测量学性质：一项范围综述。","authors":"Mattia Bozzetti, Claudia Fantuzzi, Dina El Lahlah, Sara Casagrande, Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Maria Müller Staub","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize studies using the quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) and to evaluate measurement properties of different Q-DIO translations/versions. This tool assesses the quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes documented in nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was carried out by using the updated methodology for scoping reviews of the Joanna Briggs Institute.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The characteristics of different Q-DIO versions were summarized, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the instrument(s) were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>In May 2024, searches across five databases and sources of gray literature were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 14,192 articles, 35 were deemed relevant, with 12 studies included in the COSMIN analysis. Based on the evaluation results, six versions of the Q-DIO were recommended for immediate use, and one was identified as pending further validation studies before having potential for recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the extensive translation, adaptation, and validation of Q-DIO instruments across various languages and cultural contexts, emphasizing their global significance and effectiveness in nursing practice. These instruments demonstrate robust psychometric properties, especially in content validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This scoping review sheds light on the existing knowledge, application, and validity of the Q-DIO, offering suggestions for its improvement. The results could assist nurse educators, managers, and researchers in effectively using the tool.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was reported following the guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and psychometric properties of Quality of documentation of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes (Q-DIO): A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Bozzetti, Claudia Fantuzzi, Dina El Lahlah, Sara Casagrande, Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Maria Müller Staub\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize studies using the quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) and to evaluate measurement properties of different Q-DIO translations/versions. This tool assesses the quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes documented in nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was carried out by using the updated methodology for scoping reviews of the Joanna Briggs Institute.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The characteristics of different Q-DIO versions were summarized, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the instrument(s) were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>In May 2024, searches across five databases and sources of gray literature were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 14,192 articles, 35 were deemed relevant, with 12 studies included in the COSMIN analysis. Based on the evaluation results, six versions of the Q-DIO were recommended for immediate use, and one was identified as pending further validation studies before having potential for recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the extensive translation, adaptation, and validation of Q-DIO instruments across various languages and cultural contexts, emphasizing their global significance and effectiveness in nursing practice. These instruments demonstrate robust psychometric properties, especially in content validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This scoping review sheds light on the existing knowledge, application, and validity of the Q-DIO, offering suggestions for its improvement. The results could assist nurse educators, managers, and researchers in effectively using the tool.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was reported following the guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12499\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization and psychometric properties of Quality of documentation of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes (Q-DIO): A scoping review.
Aims: To summarize studies using the quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) and to evaluate measurement properties of different Q-DIO translations/versions. This tool assesses the quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes documented in nursing practice.
Design: A scoping review was carried out by using the updated methodology for scoping reviews of the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Methods: The characteristics of different Q-DIO versions were summarized, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the instrument(s) were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.
Data sources: In May 2024, searches across five databases and sources of gray literature were performed.
Results: Out of 14,192 articles, 35 were deemed relevant, with 12 studies included in the COSMIN analysis. Based on the evaluation results, six versions of the Q-DIO were recommended for immediate use, and one was identified as pending further validation studies before having potential for recommendation.
Conclusions: This review underscores the extensive translation, adaptation, and validation of Q-DIO instruments across various languages and cultural contexts, emphasizing their global significance and effectiveness in nursing practice. These instruments demonstrate robust psychometric properties, especially in content validity and reliability.
Impact: This scoping review sheds light on the existing knowledge, application, and validity of the Q-DIO, offering suggestions for its improvement. The results could assist nurse educators, managers, and researchers in effectively using the tool.
Reporting method: This study was reported following the guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR.
Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge.
The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages.
The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy.
The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
