[一种新的有效的白内障和晶状体手术眼科患者问卷:CLOQ:白内障和晶状体眼科问卷]。

E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine
{"title":"[一种新的有效的白内障和晶状体手术眼科患者问卷:CLOQ:白内障和晶状体眼科问卷]。","authors":"E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine","doi":"10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of F<sub>WLE</sub> = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire].\",\"authors\":\"E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of F<sub>WLE</sub> = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用项目反应理论(IRT)编制新的白内障及晶状体眼科问卷(CLOQ),确定白内障手术前后患者的主观满意度。方法:对317例双侧白内障手术及不同类型人工晶状体植入术患者进行回顾性分析。问卷共37个问题,分为视力相关生活质量(VRQoL)、视觉质量(QoV)、眼镜依赖性和总体满意度。对于所有问题,有五个回答类别可供选择。通过确定模型参数/项目特征曲线进行分析。模型的检验是通过预期得分曲线,infit/装备统计,并确定信度和Cronbach's α。结果:QoL和QoV问题的IRT分析显示:1。多层次反应量表中阈值参数排列顺序清晰;2。经验得分曲线与期望得分曲线的响应模型拟合良好;3所示。单维性,WLE 值分别为0.87和0.71。术后改善明显表现在较高的人参数、眼镜依赖性和更好的视力。结论:基于部分信用模型,对模型参数、模型检验和信度进行了标准计算。结果证实了主观患者满意度评价的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire].

Background: The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).

Methods: A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.

Results: The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of FWLE = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.

Conclusion: Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Papilledema e vacuo]. [Traumatic lamellar macular hole and epiretinal gliosis after cosmetic laser iridoplasty]. [Surgery in ophthalmology during pregnancy]. [Intraocular pressure rise, hyphema and uveitis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia undergoing ibrutinib treatment]. [Optical coherence tomography biomarkers for neovascular age-related macular degeneration : Relevance for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1