经皮肾镜取石术单独及联合超声取石的效果。

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-01
M S Rahaman, M H R Bhuiyan, P P Chowdhury, N P Biswas, M A Islam
{"title":"经皮肾镜取石术单独及联合超声取石的效果。","authors":"M S Rahaman, M H R Bhuiyan, P P Chowdhury, N P Biswas, M A Islam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for large kidney stones. Recent advancements in endoscopic technology and operative techniques have significantly increased the success rate of PCNL while reducing associated complications and morbidity. A key development contributing to this progress is the introduction of various new lithotripter techniques, which facilitate rapid stone fragmentation and clearance. The objective of the study was to compare the outcome of PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy alone and combined lithotripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic). This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Urology Department of the National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology (NIKDU) in Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2019 to March 2020. Thirty patients in Group A underwent PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy, while another thirty patients in Group B underwent PCNL using combined lithotripsy. The two groups were compared in terms of stone size, operative time, hospital stay, hemoglobin loss, ancillary procedures, and initial and overall stone clearance rates. The mean age was 34.33±9.72 years (range 22-65 years) in Group A and 36.83±12.61 years (range 19-62 years) in Group B, with homogeneous distribution. There are 45 males and 15 females in two groups, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The mean stone size was 3.36±1.07 cm (range 2-6 cm) in Group A and 3.67±0.88 cm (range 2.4-6.0 cm) in Group B, with no significant differences between the groups. The mean operation time was significantly different: 67.50±13.2 minutes (range 40-86 minutes) for PCNL with pneumatic lithotripsy compared to 57.30±10.9 minutes (range 45-95 minutes) for combined lithotripsy (p<0.05). The mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was 1.37±0.50 g/dL in the pneumatic lithotripsy group, significantly higher than the 1.12±0.46 g/dL drop in the combined lithotripsy group (p<0.05). Other variables, including stone-free rate, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, showed no significant differences between the groups. The combined lithotriptripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic) signify superior efficacy in PCNL compared to the pneumatic lithotriptripsy alone, as it remarkably reduces both the total operative time and blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 1","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy by Using Pneumatic Lithotripsy Alone and In Combination with Ultrasonic Lithotripsy.\",\"authors\":\"M S Rahaman, M H R Bhuiyan, P P Chowdhury, N P Biswas, M A Islam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for large kidney stones. Recent advancements in endoscopic technology and operative techniques have significantly increased the success rate of PCNL while reducing associated complications and morbidity. A key development contributing to this progress is the introduction of various new lithotripter techniques, which facilitate rapid stone fragmentation and clearance. The objective of the study was to compare the outcome of PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy alone and combined lithotripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic). This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Urology Department of the National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology (NIKDU) in Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2019 to March 2020. Thirty patients in Group A underwent PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy, while another thirty patients in Group B underwent PCNL using combined lithotripsy. The two groups were compared in terms of stone size, operative time, hospital stay, hemoglobin loss, ancillary procedures, and initial and overall stone clearance rates. The mean age was 34.33±9.72 years (range 22-65 years) in Group A and 36.83±12.61 years (range 19-62 years) in Group B, with homogeneous distribution. There are 45 males and 15 females in two groups, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The mean stone size was 3.36±1.07 cm (range 2-6 cm) in Group A and 3.67±0.88 cm (range 2.4-6.0 cm) in Group B, with no significant differences between the groups. The mean operation time was significantly different: 67.50±13.2 minutes (range 40-86 minutes) for PCNL with pneumatic lithotripsy compared to 57.30±10.9 minutes (range 45-95 minutes) for combined lithotripsy (p<0.05). The mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was 1.37±0.50 g/dL in the pneumatic lithotripsy group, significantly higher than the 1.12±0.46 g/dL drop in the combined lithotripsy group (p<0.05). Other variables, including stone-free rate, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, showed no significant differences between the groups. The combined lithotriptripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic) signify superior efficacy in PCNL compared to the pneumatic lithotriptripsy alone, as it remarkably reduces both the total operative time and blood loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大肾结石的金标准。近年来内镜技术和手术技术的进步大大提高了PCNL的成功率,同时减少了相关并发症和发病率。促进这一进展的一项关键发展是采用了各种新的碎石机技术,这些技术促进了石头的快速破碎和清除。本研究的目的是比较单独气压碎石和联合气压碎石(气压和超声)治疗PCNL的结果。这项准实验研究于2019年4月至2020年3月在孟加拉国达卡国家肾脏疾病和泌尿外科研究所(NIKDU)泌尿外科进行。A组30例采用气压弹道碎石术,B组30例采用联合弹道碎石术。比较两组患者的结石大小、手术时间、住院时间、血红蛋白损失、辅助手术以及初始和总体结石清除率。A组患者平均年龄为34.33±9.72岁(22 ~ 65岁),B组患者平均年龄为36.83±12.61岁(19 ~ 62岁),两组患者年龄分布均匀。两组共有45只雄性和15只雌性,男女比例为3:1。A组平均结石大小为3.36±1.07 cm(范围2 ~ 6 cm), B组平均结石大小为3.67±0.88 cm(范围2.4 ~ 6.0 cm),两组间差异无统计学意义。PCNL联合气压碎石术的平均手术时间为67.50±13.2分钟(范围40-86分钟),而联合气压碎石术的平均手术时间为57.30±10.9分钟(范围45-95分钟)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy by Using Pneumatic Lithotripsy Alone and In Combination with Ultrasonic Lithotripsy.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for large kidney stones. Recent advancements in endoscopic technology and operative techniques have significantly increased the success rate of PCNL while reducing associated complications and morbidity. A key development contributing to this progress is the introduction of various new lithotripter techniques, which facilitate rapid stone fragmentation and clearance. The objective of the study was to compare the outcome of PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy alone and combined lithotripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic). This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Urology Department of the National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology (NIKDU) in Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2019 to March 2020. Thirty patients in Group A underwent PCNL using pneumatic lithotripsy, while another thirty patients in Group B underwent PCNL using combined lithotripsy. The two groups were compared in terms of stone size, operative time, hospital stay, hemoglobin loss, ancillary procedures, and initial and overall stone clearance rates. The mean age was 34.33±9.72 years (range 22-65 years) in Group A and 36.83±12.61 years (range 19-62 years) in Group B, with homogeneous distribution. There are 45 males and 15 females in two groups, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The mean stone size was 3.36±1.07 cm (range 2-6 cm) in Group A and 3.67±0.88 cm (range 2.4-6.0 cm) in Group B, with no significant differences between the groups. The mean operation time was significantly different: 67.50±13.2 minutes (range 40-86 minutes) for PCNL with pneumatic lithotripsy compared to 57.30±10.9 minutes (range 45-95 minutes) for combined lithotripsy (p<0.05). The mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was 1.37±0.50 g/dL in the pneumatic lithotripsy group, significantly higher than the 1.12±0.46 g/dL drop in the combined lithotripsy group (p<0.05). Other variables, including stone-free rate, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, showed no significant differences between the groups. The combined lithotriptripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic) signify superior efficacy in PCNL compared to the pneumatic lithotriptripsy alone, as it remarkably reduces both the total operative time and blood loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Liver Function Tests in Dengue Infected Patients. Young Patient with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Following Suicidal Organophosphorus Compounds Poisoning: A Case Report. Association between Free Tri-iodothyronine Level and In-Hospital Outcome in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Streptokinase Therapy. Association of Helicobacter Pylori Infection with Functional Dyspepsia. Anatomical and Surgical Neck Circumference of Adult Human Humerus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1