重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018
Xiaomin Wu, Baixiang Zhang, Gareth Ambler, Qingfa Chen, Huayao Huang, Huiying Lin, Shuangfang Fang, Nan Liu, Houwei Du
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiaomin Wu, Baixiang Zhang, Gareth Ambler, Qingfa Chen, Huayao Huang, Huiying Lin, Shuangfang Fang, Nan Liu, Houwei Du","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising approach in improving swallowing function after stroke. However, comparative efficacy of different rTMS protocols for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database were systematically searched for eligible random controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>RCTs comparing rTMS with control or head-to-head comparisons of 2 rTMS protocols in patients with PSD.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the pooled findings of RCTs with standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% credible interval (CrI).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Eighteen RCTs involving 760 participants (mean age of 62.4 [range 49.7-74.7] years; 45.7% women) were included. Pooled data showed that high frequency (HF)/ipsilesional hemisphere (ipsi-hemi) (SMD, -0.94; 95% CrI, -1.51 to -0.44), HF/bilateral hemisphere (bi-hemi) (SMD, -2.59; 95% CrI, -3.50 to -1.72), HF/ipsilesional cerebellar (ipsi-CRB) (SMD, -0.79; 95% CrI, -1.55 to -0.10), HF/bilateral cerebellar (bi-CRB) (SMD, -1.02; 95% CrI, -1.83 to -0.29), and HF/ipsi-hemi + low frequency (LF)/contralesional hemisphere (contra-hemi) (SMD, -2.72; 95% CrI, -4.12 to -1.41) rTMS all significantly improved swallowing function compared with control. For patients with acute stroke, HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect (SMD, -1.36; 95% CrI, -2.86 to -0.02); in subacute stage, HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi rTMS showed the best efficacy (SMD, -2.68; 95% CrI, -4.26 to -1.26). However, rTMS failed to improve swallowing function in chronic stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This network meta-analysis showed that most of the rTMS protocols (HF/ipsi-hemi, HF/bi-hemi, HF/ipsi-CRB, HF/bi-CRB, and HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi) may improve swallowing function in patients with PSD. The HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect in acute stage and the HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi protocol seemed to have the best efficacy when applied in subacute stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomin Wu, Baixiang Zhang, Gareth Ambler, Qingfa Chen, Huayao Huang, Huiying Lin, Shuangfang Fang, Nan Liu, Houwei Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising approach in improving swallowing function after stroke. However, comparative efficacy of different rTMS protocols for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database were systematically searched for eligible random controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>RCTs comparing rTMS with control or head-to-head comparisons of 2 rTMS protocols in patients with PSD.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the pooled findings of RCTs with standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% credible interval (CrI).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Eighteen RCTs involving 760 participants (mean age of 62.4 [range 49.7-74.7] years; 45.7% women) were included. Pooled data showed that high frequency (HF)/ipsilesional hemisphere (ipsi-hemi) (SMD, -0.94; 95% CrI, -1.51 to -0.44), HF/bilateral hemisphere (bi-hemi) (SMD, -2.59; 95% CrI, -3.50 to -1.72), HF/ipsilesional cerebellar (ipsi-CRB) (SMD, -0.79; 95% CrI, -1.55 to -0.10), HF/bilateral cerebellar (bi-CRB) (SMD, -1.02; 95% CrI, -1.83 to -0.29), and HF/ipsi-hemi + low frequency (LF)/contralesional hemisphere (contra-hemi) (SMD, -2.72; 95% CrI, -4.12 to -1.41) rTMS all significantly improved swallowing function compared with control. For patients with acute stroke, HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect (SMD, -1.36; 95% CrI, -2.86 to -0.02); in subacute stage, HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi rTMS showed the best efficacy (SMD, -2.68; 95% CrI, -4.26 to -1.26). However, rTMS failed to improve swallowing function in chronic stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This network meta-analysis showed that most of the rTMS protocols (HF/ipsi-hemi, HF/bi-hemi, HF/ipsi-CRB, HF/bi-CRB, and HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi) may improve swallowing function in patients with PSD. The HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect in acute stage and the HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi protocol seemed to have the best efficacy when applied in subacute stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:反复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是改善脑卒中后吞咽功能的一种有前景的方法。然而,不同rTMS方案对脑卒中后吞咽困难(PSD)的比较疗效尚不清楚。数据来源:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,检索从开始到2024年8月30日符合条件的随机对照试验(rct)。研究选择:rct比较rTMS与对照组或两种rTMS方案在PSD患者中的头对头比较。数据提取:数据由两名独立审稿人提取。采用直接和间接证据相结合的网络荟萃分析,对标准平均差(SMD)为95%可信区间(CrI)的随机对照试验的合并结果进行评估。数据综合:18项随机对照试验,涉及760名参与者(平均年龄62.4岁[范围49.7 - 74.7]岁;45.7%为女性)。汇集数据显示高频(HF) / ipsilesional半球(ipsi-hemi) (SMD = -0.94,95%区间-1.51 - -0.44),高频/双边半球(bi-hemi) (SMD = -2.59,95%区间-3.50 - -1.72),高频/ ipsilesional小脑(ipsi-CRB) (SMD = -0.79,95%区间-1.55 - -0.10),高频/双边小脑(bi-CRB) (SMD = -1.02,95%区间-1.83 - -0.29),和高频/ ipsi-hemi + 低频(LF) / contralesional半球(SMD = -2.72,95%CrI (-4.12 - -1.41) rTMS组与对照组相比均显著改善吞咽功能。对于急性脑卒中患者,HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS有积极作用(SMD = -1.36,95% CrI -2.86 - -0.02);亚急性期以HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/对半rTMS疗效最佳(SMD = -2.68,95% CrI -4.26 - -1.26)。而在慢性期,rTMS不能改善吞咽功能。结论:该网络荟萃分析显示,大多数rTMS方案(HF/ipsi-hemi、HF/bi-hemi、HF/ipsi-CRB、HF/bi-CRB和HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/对-hemi)可改善PSD患者的吞咽功能。HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS在急性期有积极作用,HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/反半方案在亚急性期应用时似乎效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising approach in improving swallowing function after stroke. However, comparative efficacy of different rTMS protocols for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) remains unclear.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database were systematically searched for eligible random controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 30, 2024.

Study selection: RCTs comparing rTMS with control or head-to-head comparisons of 2 rTMS protocols in patients with PSD.

Data extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the pooled findings of RCTs with standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% credible interval (CrI).

Data synthesis: Eighteen RCTs involving 760 participants (mean age of 62.4 [range 49.7-74.7] years; 45.7% women) were included. Pooled data showed that high frequency (HF)/ipsilesional hemisphere (ipsi-hemi) (SMD, -0.94; 95% CrI, -1.51 to -0.44), HF/bilateral hemisphere (bi-hemi) (SMD, -2.59; 95% CrI, -3.50 to -1.72), HF/ipsilesional cerebellar (ipsi-CRB) (SMD, -0.79; 95% CrI, -1.55 to -0.10), HF/bilateral cerebellar (bi-CRB) (SMD, -1.02; 95% CrI, -1.83 to -0.29), and HF/ipsi-hemi + low frequency (LF)/contralesional hemisphere (contra-hemi) (SMD, -2.72; 95% CrI, -4.12 to -1.41) rTMS all significantly improved swallowing function compared with control. For patients with acute stroke, HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect (SMD, -1.36; 95% CrI, -2.86 to -0.02); in subacute stage, HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi rTMS showed the best efficacy (SMD, -2.68; 95% CrI, -4.26 to -1.26). However, rTMS failed to improve swallowing function in chronic stage.

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis showed that most of the rTMS protocols (HF/ipsi-hemi, HF/bi-hemi, HF/ipsi-CRB, HF/bi-CRB, and HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi) may improve swallowing function in patients with PSD. The HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect in acute stage and the HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi protocol seemed to have the best efficacy when applied in subacute stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Physiotherapy and Activity Coaching in Multiple Sclerosis (IPAC-MS): Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Cost Analysis of Neck Pain Treatments for Medicare Beneficiaries. Corrigendum. Prevalence of Chronic Health Conditions Among People with Disabilities in the United States. Exploring rest advice in fatigue interventions in rehabilitation among adults with long-term conditions: a systematic scoping review of the reporting of rest in randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1