评估肠道活检组织保存方法,促进大规模粘膜微生物群研究。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550
Nicola J Wyatt, Hannah Watson, Gregory R Young, Mary Doona, Ned Tilling, Dean Allerton, Andrea C Masi, Tariq Ahmad, Jennifer A Doyle, Katherine Frith, Ailsa Hart, Victoria Hildreth, Peter M Irving, Claire Jones, Nicholas A Kennedy, Sarah Lawrence, Charlie W Lees, Robert Lees, Trevor Liddle, James O Lindsay, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Nick Powell, Natalie J Prescott, Tim Raine, Jack Satsangi, Kevin Whelan, Ruth Wood, Andrew King, Luke Jostins-Dean, R Alexander Speight, Naomi McGregor, Christopher J Stewart, Christopher A Lamb
{"title":"评估肠道活检组织保存方法,促进大规模粘膜微生物群研究。","authors":"Nicola J Wyatt, Hannah Watson, Gregory R Young, Mary Doona, Ned Tilling, Dean Allerton, Andrea C Masi, Tariq Ahmad, Jennifer A Doyle, Katherine Frith, Ailsa Hart, Victoria Hildreth, Peter M Irving, Claire Jones, Nicholas A Kennedy, Sarah Lawrence, Charlie W Lees, Robert Lees, Trevor Liddle, James O Lindsay, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Nick Powell, Natalie J Prescott, Tim Raine, Jack Satsangi, Kevin Whelan, Ruth Wood, Andrew King, Luke Jostins-Dean, R Alexander Speight, Naomi McGregor, Christopher J Stewart, Christopher A Lamb","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"112 ","pages":"105550"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of intestinal biopsy tissue preservation methods to facilitate large-scale mucosal microbiota research.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola J Wyatt, Hannah Watson, Gregory R Young, Mary Doona, Ned Tilling, Dean Allerton, Andrea C Masi, Tariq Ahmad, Jennifer A Doyle, Katherine Frith, Ailsa Hart, Victoria Hildreth, Peter M Irving, Claire Jones, Nicholas A Kennedy, Sarah Lawrence, Charlie W Lees, Robert Lees, Trevor Liddle, James O Lindsay, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Nick Powell, Natalie J Prescott, Tim Raine, Jack Satsangi, Kevin Whelan, Ruth Wood, Andrew King, Luke Jostins-Dean, R Alexander Speight, Naomi McGregor, Christopher J Stewart, Christopher A Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"105550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要大规模的多中心研究来了解肠道微生物群、健康和疾病之间的复杂关系。询问粘膜微生物群可以识别粪便分析未捕获的重要生物学。金标准组织冷冻保存(“闪冻”)限制了大规模研究的可行性。我们的目的是比较金标准和实用的粘膜活检保存条件下的肠道微生物群。方法:我们收集了20例成人炎症性肠病患者的内镜直肠乙状结肠活检。采用三种方法保存活检组织:(i)快速冷冻(大多数近端和远端活检部位);(ii)核酸保存试剂(QIAGEN Allprotect®、Invitrogen RNAlater™和zimo DNA/RNA Shield™);(iii)用石蜡包埋法(FFPE)进行福尔马林固定,用于在医疗机构中保存用于临床组织病理学的组织。在MiSeq平台(V4区,16S rRNA基因)上对菌群进行测序。结果:组织微生物群在大多数近端和远端组织之间一致,表明观察到的任何患者内部差异反映了储存条件,而不是活检位置。与金标准组织相比,试剂保存组织的α -多样性和微生物群落特征没有显著差异。受专性肠道厌氧菌相对丰度差异的驱动,FFPE的群落结构与其他组织样品显著不同;粪杆菌、厌氧菌和毛螺科。尽管存在这些差异,但无论保存和储存条件如何,组织微生物群都按参与者分组。解释:在前瞻性的大规模粘膜微生物群研究中,防腐剂为快速冷冻组织提供了一种方便的选择。虽然不具有可比性,但FFPE提供了使用历史样本进行回顾性微生物群研究的潜力。资助:医学研究理事会(MR/T032162/1)和Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley慈善信托基金(G-2002-04255)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of intestinal biopsy tissue preservation methods to facilitate large-scale mucosal microbiota research.

Background: Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions.

Methods: We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene).

Findings: Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions.

Interpretation: Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples.

Funding: Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Cellular blueprint of healthy and diseased human epiglottis and subglottis-a study of the Canadian Airways Research (CARE) group. Cohort-level clinical trajectory and molecular landscape of idiopathic subglottic stenosis for precision laryngology-a study of the Canadian airways research (CARE) group. Dynamics of gut resistome and mobilome in early life: a meta-analysis. Functional characterisation of missense ceruloplasmin variants and real-world prevalence assessment of Aceruloplasminemia using population data. Rapid high-throughput sequencing: a game-changer for timely addressing infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1