Diego Bittencourt, Ramon Martins de Oliveira, Deivid Gomes da Silva, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Marcelo de Castro Cesar, Daniela Godoi Jacomassi, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, J Derek Kingsley, Cleiton Augusto Libardi
{"title":"心率变异性个体化抗阻训练处方对老年女性肌肉力量、肌肉大小和功能表现的影响。","authors":"Diego Bittencourt, Ramon Martins de Oliveira, Deivid Gomes da Silva, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Marcelo de Castro Cesar, Daniela Godoi Jacomassi, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, J Derek Kingsley, Cleiton Augusto Libardi","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1472702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether individualizing autonomic recovery periods between resistance training (RT) sessions (IND) using heart rate variability (HRV), measured by the root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD), would lead to greater and more consistent improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional performance in older women compared to a fixed recovery protocol (FIX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one older women (age 66.0 ± 5.0 years old) were randomized into two different protocols (IND: n = 11; FIX: n = 10) and completed 7 weeks of RT. Measurements of RMSSD were performed within a five-day period to establish baseline values. The RMSSD values determined whether participants were recovered from the previous session. The assessments included muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), one-repetition maximum (1RM), peak torque (PT), rate of force development (RFD), chair stand (CS), timed up and go (TUG), 6-minutes walking (6MW), and maximum gait speed (MGS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) group vs. time interactions. There were significant main effects of time (<i>P</i> < 0.05) for CSA, 1RM, PT, TUG, CS, 6MW, and MGS, while no significant changes were observed for RFD (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IND does not seem to enhance responses in muscle mass, strength, and functional performance compared FIX in healthy older women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1472702"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of individualized resistance training prescription with heart rate variability on muscle strength, muscle size and functional performance in older women.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Bittencourt, Ramon Martins de Oliveira, Deivid Gomes da Silva, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Marcelo de Castro Cesar, Daniela Godoi Jacomassi, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, J Derek Kingsley, Cleiton Augusto Libardi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2024.1472702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether individualizing autonomic recovery periods between resistance training (RT) sessions (IND) using heart rate variability (HRV), measured by the root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD), would lead to greater and more consistent improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional performance in older women compared to a fixed recovery protocol (FIX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one older women (age 66.0 ± 5.0 years old) were randomized into two different protocols (IND: n = 11; FIX: n = 10) and completed 7 weeks of RT. Measurements of RMSSD were performed within a five-day period to establish baseline values. The RMSSD values determined whether participants were recovered from the previous session. The assessments included muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), one-repetition maximum (1RM), peak torque (PT), rate of force development (RFD), chair stand (CS), timed up and go (TUG), 6-minutes walking (6MW), and maximum gait speed (MGS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) group vs. time interactions. There were significant main effects of time (<i>P</i> < 0.05) for CSA, 1RM, PT, TUG, CS, 6MW, and MGS, while no significant changes were observed for RFD (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IND does not seem to enhance responses in muscle mass, strength, and functional performance compared FIX in healthy older women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1472702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1472702\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1472702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在探讨与固定恢复方案(FIX)相比,使用心率变异性(HRV)(由连续R-R间隔差(RMSSD)的均方根测量)来个性化阻力训练(RT)会话(IND)之间的自主恢复期是否会导致老年女性肌肉力量、肌肉质量和功能表现更大、更一致的改善。方法:21名老年妇女(66.0±5.0岁)随机分为两组(IND: n = 11;FIX: n = 10)并完成7周的rt。RMSSD的测量在5天内进行,以建立基线值。RMSSD值确定参与者是否从上一个会话中恢复。评估包括肌肉横截面积(CSA)、单次重复最大值(1RM)、峰值扭矩(PT)、力发展率(RFD)、椅子站立(CS)、计时起跑(TUG)、6分钟步行(6MW)和最大步态速度(MGS)。结果:组间与时间间无显著交互作用(P < 0.05)。时间对CSA、1RM、PT、TUG、CS、6MW和MGS有显著的主影响(P < 0.05),而对RFD无显著影响(P < 0.05)。结论:与FIX相比,IND似乎没有增强健康老年妇女肌肉质量、力量和功能表现的反应。
Effects of individualized resistance training prescription with heart rate variability on muscle strength, muscle size and functional performance in older women.
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate whether individualizing autonomic recovery periods between resistance training (RT) sessions (IND) using heart rate variability (HRV), measured by the root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD), would lead to greater and more consistent improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional performance in older women compared to a fixed recovery protocol (FIX).
Methods: Twenty-one older women (age 66.0 ± 5.0 years old) were randomized into two different protocols (IND: n = 11; FIX: n = 10) and completed 7 weeks of RT. Measurements of RMSSD were performed within a five-day period to establish baseline values. The RMSSD values determined whether participants were recovered from the previous session. The assessments included muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), one-repetition maximum (1RM), peak torque (PT), rate of force development (RFD), chair stand (CS), timed up and go (TUG), 6-minutes walking (6MW), and maximum gait speed (MGS).
Results: There were no significant (P > 0.05) group vs. time interactions. There were significant main effects of time (P < 0.05) for CSA, 1RM, PT, TUG, CS, 6MW, and MGS, while no significant changes were observed for RFD (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: IND does not seem to enhance responses in muscle mass, strength, and functional performance compared FIX in healthy older women.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.